1. Consistent Teacher judgement
School Based Assessment and
Reporting Unit
Curriculum Directorate
© 2006 Curriculum K-12 Directorate, NSW Department of Education and Training

2. Discussion What do you understand by the term “consistency”?
Why do you think consistency in teachers’ judgements is important in teaching and assessing?
Use a technique such as brainstorming to determine level of understanding around consistency
Work in small groups and report back findings to whole group

3. Consistency and Comparability
There are two important concepts underpinning the use of teacher judgement as a source of evidence of student achievement. These are:
Consistency-judgements that accord with:
Those previously made for individual students
Those made for all other students in a range of contexts
Comparability-judgements that accord with:
Those made by other teachers for individuals or groups of students
Both of these concepts are important in providing reliable and valid evidence of student achievement using judgements.
Emphasise the fact that while schools are building consistency, we are also building consistency and comparability across schools, networks and regions.

4. What is consistency?
Consistency in relation to assessment occurs when teachers are able to make judgements about student learning that are not dependent on the individual teacher, student, location or time and are based on a shared understanding of standards of learning.
Consistency in making assessment judgements needs to develop:
Across assessment tasks
Across teachers of different classes
Across key learning areas (such as creative arts, mathematics, science)
Across time (within one key learning area over a period of years)
Across schools
Establishing procedures and structures to provide sufficient time on a regular basis for teacher discussion about teaching, learning and assessment is the key to enhancing consistency.
Discussion Point:
How might your school provide sufficient time to allow regular professional dialogue around consistent teacher judgement and moderation?
Consider:
RFF organisation
Support staff
Professional learning funds
Allocation of staff/team meetings

5. Why do we need consistency of teacher judgement?
We need consistency of teacher judgement to ensure that syllabus program expectations, student achievement standards and student achievement data are valid and reliable.
Being fair to students is a compelling reason for achieving consistency in setting program expectations, achievement standards and assessing student performance.

6. Strategies for addressing the issues of Consistency
and Comparability
Developing and discussing common assessment tasks
Shared development of assessments
Shared analysis of assessments
Developing a shared understanding of program expectations and achievement standards -What do you think you are assessing?
Moderation meetings
Consider how and when these would take place
Consider the needs of staff
Beginning teachers – highly experienced
Long term casual teachers
Teachers returning after a break
Experience on a particular stage

7. Discussion
In what ways do we currently achieve consistency in our judgement?
Describe any experiences you have had with developing consistent judgements in your school or in other schools.
Brainstorm in small and/or stage groups. Share with whole group.
Open discussion of previous experience with consistency in present or previous schools.

8. Planning for consistency
Support
Teachers will be supported in making consistent judgements if:
they collaboratively plan teaching and learning programs which integrate assessment.
they collaboratively develop common assessment practices and tasks which reflect teaching and learning based on syllabuses.
they discuss student work within or across grades/faculties and schools to moderate their judgements.
“The single biggest issue facing teachers as they design assessments has nothing to do with assessment per se but with having a clear understanding of the learning outcomes they should have for students.” Arter 1998
Consistent practices and procedures around assessment and reporting occur in an environment that fosters and promotes collaborative dialogue at all stages of the teaching and learning cycle.
Discussion Points:
How do we currently plan teaching/learning programs?
How do we currently develop assessment tasks - (collaboratively, common or individual?)
How do we currently provide for the moderation process?

9. Planning for consistency
Professional Learning
Professional learning helps develop a culture that works towards achieving consistent judgements about student achievement.
Consistent judgement is best supported in a culture where:
There is an underpinning belief that consistent teacher judgement is fair to all students
Teachers realise the value and importance of consistency, and are committed to working towards consistent assessment
Teachers are involved in working collaboratively
Processes for encouraging sharing and discussion are open, ethical, transparent and non-judgemental
Teachers, parents and students have confidence in the validity of judgements reached in schools.
Discussion Points:
How much professional learning time is devoted to consistency of teacher judgement?
What do we need to do to develop a culture where teachers feel comfortable engaging in professional dialogue around their work?

10. Planning for consistency
Critical issues that support consistency of teacher judgement
The use of previous assessment information to provide direction for the current program at both whole-class and individual levels.
Identification, at the planning stage, of how, when and what will be assessed. These will include the diagnostic, formative and summative assessment opportunities that occur throughout the teaching and learning sequence.
Recognition that assessment should link directly to, and provide evidence of, achievement of the standard expected by the syllabus.
Acknowledgement that sometimes students demonstrate achievement of outcomes in ways other than those that teachers have planned. Teachers need to be open to these opportunities.
Collaboration between staff to further clarify understanding of outcomes.

11. Planning for consistency
The role and needs of parents
What are the implications of our work in consistency for our parent community?
What are the needs of our parents in relation to consistency in teachers’ judgements?
How can teachers better understand what parents’ needs are?
How can teachers involve parents in the dialogue about the professional judgements being made?
How can teachers benefit from working more closely with parents?
What are the desired outcomes of our collaboration with parents in this area?
What professional development activities support a partnership between parents and teachers in exploring consistency?
What strategies for communication can we develop to enhance parents’ understanding of assessment, reporting and consistency in teachers’ judgements?
Consider:
Parents want to be assured that the decisions being made about their child’s progress will be fully communicated to them.
How does your school go about communicating student progress to parents?