1. Update on the Kansas Writing Assessment Fall 2008 version 2.0 Matt Copeland Language Arts and Literacy Consultant Standards and Assessment Services Team Kansas State Dept. of Education 785-296-5060 mcopeland@ksde.org

2. Writing Fact Sheet A continually updated, one- page summary of the Kansas Writing Assessment, including information regarding:  state testing window  QPA writing targets  cut points and performance levels Available on the KSDE Writing Homepage: www.ksde.org/Default.aspx?tabid=1726

3. The Kansas Writing Assessment Required biennially at grades 5, 8, and high school (OTL) Can be given on “off years” as a local option Requires four untimed testing sessions, approximately 45-minutes each Scored locally using a 6-TRAIT analytic rubric Writing samples from each district are sent to the state NOT a part of AYP but IS a part of QPA

4. Writing and QPA For the 2006-2007 school year, writing performance was added to the QPA process as a requirement for all schools. Writing scores for 2007 were for informational purposes to help schools guide writing instruction for 2009 when writing scores will “count” toward QPA accreditation.

5. QPA Writing Targets QPA writing goals have been established to tie student writing achievement to school accreditation. 5th Grade67% of students meeting or exceeding standard 8th Grade73% of students meeting or exceeding standard High School76% of students meeting or exceeding standard * Unlike AYP targets, these numbers are static and will remain constant over time.

6. “Meeting or Exceeding Standard?” In Summer 2009, the Kansas Writing Assessment will follow a similar standard setting procedure as the other content-area assessments to set new cut points for the five performance levels. In previous years, the following cut points* have been used based upon a student’s composite score*… * Note: These cut points and the composite score formula may change for 2009 and beyond.

7. Composite Score Formula* Ideas and Content scorex 3= ____ Organization scorex 3= ____ Voice scorex 2= ____ Word Choice scorex 2= ____ Sentence Fluency scorex 1= ____ Conventions scorex 1= ____ Sum / 12 * Note: The composite score formula may change for 2009 and beyond.

8. Student Performance Levels Determined by a student’s composite score: Cut Points* Exemplary4.40 Exceeds Standard3.75 Meets Standard3.00 Approaches Standard2.30 Academic Warning< 2.30 * Note: These cut points may change for 2009 and beyond.

9. Changes to the 2008-2009 Kansas Writing Assessment “We always overestimate the change that will occur in the next two years and underestimate the change that will occur in the next ten.” – Bill Gates

10. What HAS NOT Changed for 2008-2009 Kansas Writing Assessment process-based writing over four sessions grade levels assessed: 5 th, 8 th, and high school (OTL) grade-level mode assignments: 5th grade—narrative 8th grade—expository high school—persuasive 6-TRAIT analytic scoring

11. Changes for 2008-2009 Kansas Writing Assessment all new student prompt format new subject matter for students to write about updated scoring rubrics with descriptors for the “2” and “4” ratings a suggested procedure for local scoring a new vision for state scoring

12. Assigned Writing Forms Fifth grade students – personal narrative in nature. Eighth grade students – expository essays that explain an idea or concept. High school students – persuasive essays (as opposed to persuasive letters).

13. Prompt Choice Fifth grade students – choice of 3 prompts. Eighth grade students – choice of 4 prompts. High school students – choice of 5 prompts.

14. Prompt Format Writing Situation The first sentence provides the background for the writing assignment and the general topic. The remaining sentences help writers consider different aspects of the topic, realize that they know enough about the topic to write, and focus their individual responses. Directions for Writing The first sentence identifies the nature/form of the writing (an essay) and also identifies an audience. The remaining sentences remind students to help their audience understand their ideas by giving many details and examples to support their ideas and, at the high school level, also direct students to address opposing viewpoints.

15. Instructional Example Prompts For each assessed grade level, 8-12 example prompts are provided, each with a “teaching tip” to spark ideas on how these prompts might be used in classroom instruction and/or for formative purposes. KSDE Writing Homepage: www.ksde.org/Default.aspx?tabid=1726

16. Updated Rubrics Changes to format: descriptors organized under four criteria within each trait landscape orientation “checkbox” bullets Changes to content: descriptors added for the ‘2’ and ‘4’ levels point level labels were changed to better reflect the stages of a writing process Rubrics are available for download on the KSDE Writing Homepage: http://www.ksde.org/Default.aspx?tabid=1726

17. Updated Rubrics

18. Suggested Scoring Procedures Includes: General suggested procedures for local scoring Suggested procedures for scoring each individual essay Suggested Scoring Procedures are available on the KSDE Writing Homepage: http://www.ksde.org/Default.aspx?tabid=1726

19. General suggested procedures for local scoring: Calibrating scorers to the rubric before each session Two readers are preferable to only one Scorers should be encouraged to discuss their ratings with other scorers Periodically, scorers should physically mark a copy of the rubric as they score to personally verify their ratings Suggested Scoring Procedures

20. Suggested procedures for scoring each essay: Determine which set of descriptors best describe the essay for each of four criteria within a given trait Then, scorers should use the four criteria levels they identified to inform the rating of the overall trait Suggested Scoring Procedures

21. Scoring an Individual Essay

22. KSDE Training Manual for 6-TRAIT Scoring Updated Training Manual (and accompanying PowerPoint) is now available on the KSDE Writing Homepage: Includes pre-scored samples essays written by Kansas students that can be used for training/calibration purposes.

23. Practice Scoring Using pre-scored sample essays from the KSDE Training Manual for 6-TRAIT scoring, let’s practice scoring student writing at the 5 th grade, 8 th grade, and high school levels.

24. A New Vision for State Scoring “Old” Philosophy Writing expertise existed among a select few and that select group needed to convene each summer for the purpose of weighing in on the accuracy of local scoring. “New” Philosophy Quality scoring practices and procedures can be implemented at the local level to facilitate accurate scoring, and writing expertise can be cultivated in each school district.

25. Changes to Local Scoring “Old” System Local districts could—if desired—use the “Local Rater ID” box on the bubble sheet to track local scoring. No information was gathered about local scoring practices. A 10% random sample of student writing from each local district was sent in for state scoring. “New” System All local districts are now asked to use the “Local Rater ID” box. However, the identity of each local rater will not be known outside the district. Local raters are asked to complete a survey of scoring practices. A 10% random sample of student writing will still be mailed to the state.

26. Changes to State Scoring “Old” System Student writing was scored by a large state committee and state scores were used to recalculate local scores. Score reports listed combined local/state scores and also discrepancies between state and local scorers. “New” System Some state level scoring will still occur to generate example essays for training purposes and, potentially, to also “spot check” some local districts. State-level scores will not affect local scores or QPA performance determinations. New reporting features will allow local districts to compare each local scorer to building, district, and state averages as well as review results from the survey of scoring practices.

27. English language learners who are not exempt because of “Recently Arrived” status will be administered the general education writing assessment. The 10% random sample of student writing from each district will be mailed directly to KSDE and not to CETE. In some cases, it may also be possible to submit that sample electronically. Additional Changes for 2009 KWA

28. Other Available Resources Glossary of Writing Terminology provides clarification on commonly confused and/or misunderstood terms in reference to their use on the Kansas Writing Assessment might be appropriate for both students and educators available on the KSDE Writing Homepage:

29. Other Available Resources Rubrics for Incorporating Research and Citing Sources Grades 3-7 Grades 8-12  Although not a part of the Kansas Writing Assessment, these rubrics are formatted like those for the assessment and help educators communicate our expectations for academic writing and avoiding plagiarism.  Available on the KSDE Writing Homepage:

30. Other Available Resources illustrative lists of the various types and genres of writing that might fit into each mode (narrative, technical, expository, persuasive) helps communicate that most writing often blends several modes or moves back and forth among modes available on the KSDE Writing Homepage: Illustration of Writing Modes Chart

31. Other Available Resources KAMM Writing Assessment simplified language in instructions and prompts reduced number of prompts writing scored using modified 6-trait rubrics (available at ) only 3% of a district’s students may be classified as “Meets Standard” or above using the modified or the alternate assessment questions?... contact: Joan Houghton – jhoughton@ksde.org No changes have been made to the 2009 KAMM Writing Assessement from recent years’ administrations.

32. Other Available Resources Kansas Alternate Assessment portfolio of student’s performance of skills and content on five selected indicators administered to identified students (IEP) in grades 5, 8, and once in high school only 1% of a district’s students may be classified as “Meets Standard” or above using an alternate assessment questions?… contact: Deb Matthews – dmatthews@ksde.org

33. KSDE Assessment Contacts Scott Smith, Assistant Director for Assessments (785) 296-4358 sesmith@ksde.org Cherie Randall, Assessment Coordinator (785) 296-3996 crandall@ksde.org David Bowman, Assessment Consultant (785) 296-4349 dbowman@ksde.org

34. Communication from KSDE about Writing KSDE Writing Homepage—Standards, Assessment, and Resources KSDE Writing ListServ (email me to be added to this list) Contact me directly Phone (785) 296-5060 Email mcopeland@ksde.org