1. R ESEARCH D ESIGN KNR 164

2. THE GOAL 1. To learn how to select, read, understand, and critically review a research article a. What is (should be) in one b. Types of research c. What are variables d. Research Methods A good test – can you read, understand and critically review the research article you selected? As we go through the components of an article – read and apply this knowledge to your own article to “decipher” it’s content

3. A TTITUDE IS A LTITUDE L IFE L ONG LEARNING = SUCCESS Allied health careers Evidence Based Medicine Why are you doing this and is there proof it works? Can you prove what YOU are doing works? The “size” of Medical Knowledge doubles every 5 years! Exercise science careers Merit based pay for performance outcomes Why are you doing this and is there proof it works? can you prove what YOU are doing works?

4. F INDING R ESEARCH A RTICLES Goal is to find “primary references” from peer-reviewed academic journals 1. identify key journals in a specific subdiscipline and look through table of contents 2. conduct keyword searches using common databases available through Milner library - Pubmed - Google scholar 3. ask ES professors and/or using class reading lists

6. Source: Reading and interpreting literature in exercise science (Cramer & Beck, 2008)

7. Peer Reviewed Articles vs. Non-Peer Reviewed The Peer Review process infers rigor = ensures higher quality Who is a “peer”? Expert in the field and in this specific area Stated in Journal’s bylaws and operating procedures go to home page of journal and read it’s procedures This process is time consuming Is your article “peer reviewed”…how do you know?

8. Peer Reviewed Journals: Structure Editorial Board – Group who sets scientific mission, process, outlets and price (Governance – top people in field) Editors – usually 1 – 2 people (Final decisions/disputes) Associate Editors – depends of size and breadth of journal (10-30); assigned articles and are charged with administering the process; makes recommendation of reject/accept decision to Editors Reviewers – general assembly; all qualified people selected by Assoc. Editors to read and critique the manuscript. Blinded process – Only Associate Editors know who is involved No one gets paid = service

9. Peer Reviewed Journals: Process 1. Manuscript submitted to Journal (electronically) 2. Editors read abstract and assigns Associate Editor 3. Associate Editors assign 3-5 reviewers to read and review - make comments on content, validity, writing/grammar - suggest improvements, add data, change analysis - make recommendation to accept, revise or reject 4. Associate Editor collects reviewer recommendations - synthesizes/summarizes/ checks reviewer’s comments - sends recommendation to Editors 5. Final Decision sent to Authors

11. C OMPONENTS OF ( MOST ) R ESEARCH A RTICLES 1. Abstract 2. Introduction a. Purpose b. Hypothesis 3. Methods a. Subjects b. Equipment/tools c. Statistical procedures 4. Results a. Significant differences b. Graphs and tables 5. Discussion a. Interpretation – a. What does this mean b. How does it help c. How does it compare d. What are the limitations Does YOUR article have these components?

12. Is your article one of these? Why? Where and how is your study’s sample taken Can you categorize your study into one of these areas? If your article does not fall into one of these; please find another one that does.

13. B ASIC E LEMENTS : V ARIABLES Variable: what is measured or varied. An attribute or characteristic of a person (or object) that can change from person to person. Independent Dependent Control Intervening (mediator) Moderator Can you find and list the variables in your study?

14. C LASSIFICATION OF V ARIABLES Independent Variable: a variable that is manipulated, measured or selected by the researcher in order to observe its relation to the subject's "response” on another variable. Dependent Variable: the variable that is observed and measured in response to an independent variable. EXAMPLE: What is the effect of increasing treadmill grade on heart rate during running? - What is IV? - What is DV? Can you explain why for each case? Is this an example of a experimental or non-experimental study?

15. B ASIC E LEMENTS : P URPOSE & H YPOTHESES Purpose: succinct statement of goal; based on introduction Hypothesis: a tentative statement about the expected relationship between two or more variables. State expected relationship or difference between 2 variables Be testable Be brief and clear What is the purpose of your study? What is the stated hypothesis?

16. H YPOTHESES types of hypotheses alternative vs. null one-tailed vs. two-tailed

17. Alternative hypothesis (H A )… what you predict what you think will happen Null hypothesis (H O ) … all remaining possible outcomes Conclusion: Reject the null and retain the Alternate (p<.05) Hypotheses: alternative vs. null

18. Hypotheses: one-tailed vs. two-tailed Two-tailed is non-directional – hypothesis does not state direction of outcome; just differences to occur One tailed gives a predicted directional response – hypothesis gives directional response of the outcome; Less room for error, makes the hypothesis “tighter” probability of being “right” is higher

19. If you were receiving this drug - would you want the data to be based any response; or, a directional response? Why does this even matter? In many studies it doesn’t But what if the “stakes” of being wrong were very high? Purpose: to determine the benefit of angiostatin on reducing blood clotting in heart tissue immediately following heart attack symptoms H YPOTHESES : ONE - TAILED VS. TWO - TAILED