1. Source for Forest inventory and Analysis Data : USDA Forest Service, SRS South Carolina Forestry Commission South Carolina Forest Land TX OK AR LA MS KY TN AL FL VA NC SC GA

2. Source: Sheffield, USDA Forest Service, SRS, FIA Data 0 5 10 15 20 25 Million Acres Alabama Arkansas Florida Georgia Kentucky Louisiana Mississippi North Carolina Oklahoma South Carolina Tennessee Texas Virginia The South’s Forestland by State, 1998 South Carolina ranks 10 th in acreage of commercial timberland in the Southeast.

3. ** Industry includes leased Private lands. * FIA 2000 data is preliminary representing 60% of the total plots to be sampled. The distribution of ownerships in SC parallel closely with the Southeast (13 states). A total of 90% of the landowners in SC are private nonindustrial landowners and forest industry. Source: USDA Forest Service, SC Forestry Commission, FIA Data

4. * FIA 2000 data is preliminary representing 60% of the total plots to be sampled. South Carolina has a fairly even distribution of forest types demonstrating diversity of the forests. Source: USDA Forest Service, SC Forestry Commission, FIA Data

5. Forest Type Distribution by State Pine plantation Natural pine Upland hardwood Oak–pine Bottomland hardwood Source: Sheffield, USFS, FIA Data.

6. The trend in SC for the past 15 years, as well as the SE, is the divesting of large land holdings by forest companies. Pension funds and partnerships are purchasing much of these large acreages. Industry consolidation and present tax laws have been a major force in this trend, and this trend is expected to continue. Source: USDA Forest Service, SC Forestry Commission, FIA Data * FIA 2000 data is preliminary representing 60% of the total plots to be sampled.

7. Total growing stock volume has increased 111% since 1958. Softwood has increased 106% (or by 4.6 billion cubic feet). Hardwood has increased 117% (or by 4.7 billion cubic feet). Note that Hurricane Hugo (1989) destroyed an estimated 2.5 billion cubic feet and only 387 million cubic feet (15%) was salvaged and is reflected in the 1993 data. The amount of timber destroyed in one day was equivalent to approximately 4 years of harvesting. Source: USDA Forest Service, and SC Forestry Commission, FIA Data * Growing Stock is inventory of commercial trees at least 5 inches in diameter in the forest. ** FIA 2000 data is preliminary representing 60% of the total plots to be sampled.

8. Forestry has come under criticism of converting too much forestland to planted pine. The perception is that much of the hardwood forests are being converted to pine. The actual trend is demonstrated above showing the conversion of natural pine sites to planted pine. Hardwood area remains relatively constant for the last 50 years. Source: USDA Forest Service, FIA Data, 1993

9. For the last 25 years, forest acreage has remained constant, while forest land ownerships have changed significantly. Individual and corporate landowners have increased in area, industry has increased slightly and is presently in a downturn, while farm ownership of forest land has decreased almost 46 percent. Farm land acreage (crop and pasture acreage) has decreased 34.6 % from 1958 to 1993. Source: USDA Forest Service, FIA Data, 1993

10. Source: SC Forestry Commission During the decade of of the 1990s, SC planted an average of 146,000 acres per year.

11. Source: SC Forestry Commission South Carolina has been a leader in the SE in regard to acres planted relative to timberland acreage. The first spike of acres planted is the Soil Bank Program, and the second spike represents the Conservation Reserve Program (CRP).

12. * FIA 2000 data is preliminary representing 60% of the total plots to be sampled. Source: USDA Forest Service, SC Forestry Commission, FIA Data Softwood growing stock is showing remarkable recovery from the hurricane Hugo devastation (1989). With proper management, there should be an increase in growing stock volume for the 10 to 14 inch diameter classes in the next 10 years.

13. Source: USDA Forest Service, SC Forestry Commission, FIA Data * FIA 2000 data is preliminary representing 60% of the total plots to be sampled. The distribution of hardwood diameter classes has not shown significant change I the last 22 years.

14. Population density map for North Carolina, South Carolina, and Georgia # of People Per Square Mile* > 800 400 - 800 200 - 400 100 - 200 0 - 100 * 1999 population estimates by CACI International, Inc. based on 1990 US Census Virginia Study (D. Ware, et al., USDA Forest Service,1998) At approximately 45 people/square mile, there is a 50:50 chance of practicing forestry. At 150 people/square mile, forest management approaches zero.

15. Forecast Change in Forest Land 1992-2010 forest change >14% loss 8-14% loss 1-8% loss stable >1% gain Source: USDA Forest Service, SRS

16. >52% of the saw logs >77% of the pulpwood >66% of the plywood and veneer >42% of the composite panel >59% of total product output The Southeast Supplies Source: Johnson, USFS, TPO Data, 1997.

17. Saw logs5.01.26.2 Veneer1.2.1681.35 Pulpwood2.01.13.1 C. Panel.083.039.122 Other.269.626.895 All Products8.4943.13311.627 Softwood (Billions of dollars) Hardwood Total Value of Products to the Southeast Delivered to mill prices Source: Johnson, USDA Forest Service, TPO Data, 1997.

18. The chart represents a total of all roundwood types, and also reflects an increase in production over time. When assessing value and production together in terms of value per cubic foot ($/cu.ft.), there is a 87.4 % increase in delivered value over the 20 year period, or 4.4%/year (simple interest and constant dollars). Total value was calculated by using timber product output data and average stumpage and delivered values by products from Timber Mart-South. Compiled by Clemson University from USDA Forest Service TPO Data and Timber Mart-South *Stumpage is the value of trees standing in the forest.

20. Source: USDA Forest Service, TPO Data

21. Summary  Forest land base is stable  Overall mix of pine and hardwood has not changed greatly in 5 decades and is not expected to change significantly in the future  Pine component moving steadily toward more planted stands…fewer natural  Greater private ownership will keep the south’s forests productive and in demand  Maximum sustainable harvest levels in sight but no indication of running out of timber in the future

22. Potential constraints on timber supply:  Timberland Operability - adverse sites, best management practices  Timberland Availability - ownership, policy, and government control  Age Structure and Stocking - past management and Hugo’s impact  Policy Issues - set asides, harvesting restrictions, and potential regulations  Lack of knowledge and incentives for private non-industrial landowners to practice sustainable forestry  Lack of proactive public participation by the forestry community

23. Opportunities to increase growth and yield  Regeneration with improved seedling stock  Commercial thinningwhere feasible  Harvest and regenerate at maturity  Salvage and regenerate when appropriate  Continue investments in R & D  Other stand improvements where feasible

24. 1,073,521 Total Tons 85% Softwood 15% Hardwood Source: USDA Forest Service, TPO Data, 1993

25. Source: USDA Forest Service, TPO Data, 1997 Wood Residue Disposal in SC

26. Annual Forest Biomass Residuals From Timber Harvesting Pine ~ 4.1 Million Tons Hardwood ~ 5.2 Million Tons

31. Economic Value of Wildlife in South Carolina 1.1 million participated in wildlife recreation annually Annual expenditures top $1.5 billion $30 million annually for land-use access fees to private landowners Source: 1996 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife- Associated Recreation

32. Economic Value of Wildlife in South Carolina Hunting in SC Annually Generates …. 10,677 jobs $357 million in retail sales $192 million in salaries and wages $23 million in state and federal taxes $18 million in sales tax $658 million in total economic effects Source: 1996 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife- Associated Recreation

33. Economic Value of Wildlife Hunting in SC # of hunters300,000 Days of hunting6,921,000 Days/hunter23 Average/hunter$1,150 Average/day$17

34. Economic Value of Wildlife Types of Hunting in SC#Hunters Deer245,000 Dove 71,000 Squirrel 56,000 Wild Turkey 53,000 Ducks 44,000 Rabbit 40,000 Quail 34,000

35. Economic Value of Wildlife in South Carolina Annual Fishing in SC... Total Participants986,000 Residents638,000 NR349,000 Total Expenditures$707 million Average/Participant$717 Source: 1996 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife- Associated Recreation

36. Economic Value of Wildlife in South Carolina Annual Wildlife Activities # People Feed Wildlife*761,000 Observe Wildlife577,000 Photograph Wildlife172,000 Maintain Natural Areas154,000 Maintain Plantings127,000 Visit Public Areas101,000 Source: 1996 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife- Associated Recreation *Cash receipts for sunflower seed production for wildlife in SC surpassed other agriculture crops in 2000 (Ed Murdock, personal communication)

37. Economic Value of Wildlife Wildlife Watching in SC Total Participants1.1 million Residents817,000 NR408,000 Total Expenditures$3 million Average/Participant$290

38. Landowner Income Alternatives from Wildlife- Related Activities Permits Fee Hunting (dove fields) Fee Fishing Shooting Preserves Sporting Clays Non-consumptive Fee Access Hunting Leases

39. Summary Points to Remember... Natural resources (forest, wildlife, & fisheries) surpasses agriculture in total economic importance to SC Diversifies farm/forest land income and compliments traditional land-use & management