2. Optical LAN Solutions – Customer Overview The Infrastructure of Tomorrow, Available Today Sean P. Kelly, RCDD March 12, 2012 © 2011 Tyco Electronics Corp., a TE Connectivity LTD Company. All Rights Reserved. ADC, ADC logo, Rapid Reel, RealFlex, TE Connectivity, TE Connectivity logo, TFP, TRUENET, and Tyco Electronics are trademarks. Other products, logos, and company names herein may be trademarks of their respective owners.

3. PON Basics PON- Passive Optical Network - (Carrier) Between Central Office (CO), or substation, and the premises in FTTx POL- Passive Optical Local Area Network - (Enterprise) Between the data center and the user*. *A user can be a human or device. (Virtually any IP device with an RJ-45 interface) No power required from the data center to the user area.

4. PON Basics Cont. GPON - One of the fastest growing PON architectures today - Point to Multipoint - Bandwidth on Demand Established and proven in the outside plant with various FTTH projects such as Verizon FIOS in the US, and many others around the world. The success of the OSP system has created an opportunity to bring the same system design into the enterprise.

5. GPON Details Single, singlemode fiber to each work area - Downstream up to 2.4Gbs @ 1490nm – (TDM) voice, data, switched video - Upstream up to 1.2Gbs @ 1310nm – (TDMA) voice, data, signaling video - WDM video (RF/Analog) overlay and future DWDM applications @ 1550nm - All simultaneous Technically Future Proof (Passive Components) - SM fiber has an unknown bandwidth limitation. - Until electronics reach the limit, glass manufacturers will not design “next generation” singlemode - Upgrades to the next generation are as simple as replacing the electronics

6. Active Components (Powered) – Motorola, Tellabs, Alcatel, and others OLT – Optical Line Terminal - AKA - Enterprise Aggregation Switch - Located in the Data Center - After the Level 3 WAN router Fully populated OLT - Up to 14 Line cards - 4 Singlemode output ports per card = 56 Outputs per chassis = 1792 Work Group Terminals (1x32 splitters) = 7168 Ethernet Ports (ONT has 4 copper output ports) OLT – Optical Line Terminal Photo courtesy of Motorola (19” Rack Mountable) 24.5” x 17.4”x 16.8”

7. Active Components (Powered) ONT – Optical Network Terminal - Located near the user or device - 4 RJ45 (10/100/1000) output ports with optional POE - Up to 62W* of available POE - Standard HVAC is adequate *Vendor Specific - Optional internal or external battery back-up. ONT – Optical Network Terminal Photo courtesy of Motorola

8. Traditional LAN Solutions Key Elements Top Level System View Requires this much cable 884 lbs. - 144 MMF x 55m (Horizontal) = 390 lbs. - 144 Cat 5E x 55m (Horizontal) = 494 lbs. 144 User Example

9. Optical LAN Solutions Key Elements Top Level System View Requires this much cable 182 lbs. - 144 SMF x 55m = 182 lbs. This is technically the “Horizontal Cabling” – Copper runs can be up to 100 meters. 144 User Example

10. OLS vs. MMF for data Copper for voice The OLS solution eliminates cable congestion that is associated with traditional structured cabling applications. Traditional networks would require a home run from each user for voice, data, and even video. The OLS solution utilizes a single fiber for all services reducing cable bundles. Small form factor factory terminated multi-fiber cables and MT connectors reduce cable congestion and speed up installations Conventional Cables 144 MM fiber cables (Data) 144 copper cables (Voice) FTTD Cables 144 SM fibers (Data, voice & video)

11. Traditional Ethernet design for a 500 user system Power HVAC Racking UPS (8) 24 port Workgroup switches per floor Home-run cabling to each user Enterprise Multi-service Router in Data Center REQUIRES YES NO

12. OLS design for 500 user system Power HVAC Racking UPS Workgroup switches Home-run cabling Enterprise Multi-service Router in Data Center REQUIRES YES NO

13. TE OLS infrastructure schematic Up to 12 miles!!!

14. TE Connectivity Confidential – Do Not Distribute TE PON Solution TFP – TrueNet Fiber Panel iFDH – indoor Fiber Distribution Hub Passive Optical Splitters (1x32) iFDT – indoor Fiber Distribution Terminal (Consolidation Point) Faceplates and Adapters ONT Copper Patch Cords Fiber Patch Cords OLT

15. TE PON Solution TFP – TrueNet Fiber Panel iFDH – indoor Fiber Distribution Hub Passive Optical Splitters (1x32) iFDT – indoor Fiber Distribution Terminal (Consolidation Point) Faceplates and Adapters ONT Copper Patch Cords Fiber Patch Cords OLT

16. xPON Active Equipment Photos courtesy of Motorola 1.6” (H) x 5.5” (W) x 6.5” (L) TE PON Solution OLT – Optical Line Terminal ONT – Optical Network Terminal Edge Router DC Rectifier

17. Rapid Innerduct collector box Collection point for iFDT feeder cables Positioned near each hub – Typically within 100’ of the iFDH – In a convenient location that will allow access to pull cables from terminals – Under the floor or in the ceiling Designed to accommodate all iFDH sizes

19. Savings Footprint Power/Cooling/Capital Expenditures Infrastructure costs savings – 1000 User system ~ 70% savings Source FOLS horizontal cabling costs model fiber vs. UTP Plug-n-play labor cost savings over traditional Footprint: -No switches and patch panels = no racks = no dedicated room - iFDH can be located in a broom closet - Floor space can be reallocated* * Savings are realized upon reallocation of space Power/Cooling/Capital Expenditures: - No switches (CapEx) - No power for switches - No additional cooling for switches - No maintenance contracts - No UPS back up for switches (CapEx) - Additional power savings - Additional cooling savings Infrastructure costs comparison FTTD infrastructure savings over MMF for data and copper for voice approach 250 User system- 60% savings 500 User system- 62% savings 1000 User system- 70% savings 2000 User system- 69% savings Source FOLS horizontal cabling costs model fiber vs. UTP The plug-n-play functionality of the FTTD solution offers tremendous labor cost savings over traditional MMF installations 250 User system> $7K savings 500 User system > $15K savings 1000 User system > $30K savings 2000 User system > $60K savings Source FOLS horizontal cabling costs model fiber vs. UTP Actual installation data

20. Footprint Savings 75 Users250+ Users

21. Savings Case Studies: – University of Mary Washington – Russell Investments University of Mary Washington - Part of UMW’s Sustainability Initiative - Reduced the number of IDFs from 10 to 3 - Each IDF is now located in a broom closet - Previously allocated IDF space now revenue generating dorm rooms - Design saved many pounds of plastic and copper compared to CAT6 - Reduced overhead racks - Reduced building weight - Received two LEED credits (Unusual for structured cabling) Source: David Scott - Motorola Russell Investments, Seattle, Washington - Estimated $450K in commercial power savings - Actual year one savings >$1MM - IDF costs reduced - $70k per IDF - 2 IDFs per floor Source: David Scott - Motorola

22. 2 Users Per ONT4 Users Per ONT Traditional LAN (1Cu Data / 1Cu Voice) System 46% User 73% System - User - Traditional LAN (1 Shared Cu Voice/Data) System - User - System 28% User 82% Percentages reflect savings over traditional Savings of cable plant and electronics only Does not include potential OpEx or Labor savings Exact savings may vary by specific design Design savings using TE OLS Source data Passive Optical LAN (PON) Solution

23. 2010 Department of Army Directive Technical Guidance for Network Modernization April 23, 2010

24. Your Converged Network Solution FDT IP-TV Services Edge Router Video Server Soft PBX 12 miles nominal distance from OLT to ONT Data Center Riser Closet Office Workspace Desktop Remote Mgmt No User Ctrls Remote Test QoS Features PSTN OLT FDH No Power No Cooling No Monitoring No Maintenance SMF Jumper WAN LAN 12 x Gig-E 2 x 10 Gig-E Firewall 12VDC 8 Watts PWR 4 x 1000 Base-T IP Video VoIP PhoneLANSpare 23

25. Typical Office Layout (Leading Solution)

26. OLS Campus/Redundant Architecture

27. OLS Architecture Alternate Home-run Application

28. Deployment: Single Wing in Building Environment Cubicles:120 Offices: 20 Printer/Fax: 4 Conf. Rooms: 6 Solution Fiber Hub:1 Terminals: 12 Splices: 0 Field Terminations: 0 Results Duration: 1 Week Gbps Ethernet Ports: 600

29. Deployment: Dorm Room Environment 2 students sharing a room Voice Ports: 1+ Data Ports: 6 RF Connections: 3 Solution ONTs per Dorm: 2 Lockable cabinets: 2 Splices: 0 Field Terminations: 0 Results Fibers to each room: 2 Comms ports provisioned: 12+

30. Deployment: Three Separate Networks Environment Cubicles:204 Offices: 16 Printer/Fax: 16 Conf. Rooms: 10 Results Duration: 2 Weeks Gbps Ethernet Ports: 984 Solution Fiber Hub:2 Terminals: 18 Splices: 0 Field Terminations: 0

31. Deployment: Business Office Environment Cubicles:195 Offices: 8 Conf. Rooms: 10 Solution Fiber Hub:2 Terminals: 24 Splices: 0 Field Terminations: 0 Results Duration: 1 Week Gbps Ethernet Ports: 812

32. FDH- Each Floor FDH- Central FDH- Homerun Split on Floor (1x32) Split on Floor (2x32) Redundant Campus Distribution FDH- Central FDH- Homerun Split on Floor (1x32) Split on Floor (2x32) Redundant Campus Distribution

33. OLT Installation (Data Center) EMS Server Motorola OLT EXAMPLE Tellabs OLT EXAMPLE

34. ONT Installation ONT desktop mount version ONT under-desk mount version ONT wall-mount version Appliance outlet SECURE Wall Box version

35. Target PON Users Hospitals Campuses Universities Cruise Ships Hotels (Large) Government and Military High Occupancy Buildings (Call Centers) Multi-Tenant Units (Commercial and Residential)

36. Summary of Benefits Up to 50% reduction in network power consumption Significantly reduced cabling construction costs* Significant floor space savings with TE OLS plug and play design Multiple buildings served by one main equipment room Plenum rated cable and reduced bulk allow for more flexible architectural design considerations Reduced fire load, building weight, and use of non-renewable materials Intuitive plug and play design reduces installation time and errors Lower future expansion costs Virtually future proof (cable plant) Overall TCO reduction

37. Thank You! Thank you