Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Nancy J. Scherer A. Lynn Williams East Tennessee State University Ann Kaiser, Megan Roberts, Jennifer Frey, Kristin Mullins Vanderbilt University Carol.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Nancy J. Scherer A. Lynn Williams East Tennessee State University Ann Kaiser, Megan Roberts, Jennifer Frey, Kristin Mullins Vanderbilt University Carol."— Presentation transcript:

1 Nancy J. Scherer A. Lynn Williams East Tennessee State University Ann Kaiser, Megan Roberts, Jennifer Frey, Kristin Mullins Vanderbilt University Carol Stoel-Gammon University of Washington 14 th ICPLA Conference June 27-30, Cork Ireland

2  Delayed in onset of canonical babbling  Composition of babbling is less complex  Smaller consonant inventories  Poorer speech accuracy (Percent Consonants Correct)  Delayed onset and acquisition of words  Lexical selectivity ◦ Produce more words beginning with the sounds they can produce (nasals, glides, vowels) & fewer beginning with high pressure consonants ◦ Preference for sounds at the extremes of the vocal tract (labials, velars, and glottals)

3  Targets both speech and vocabulary simultaneously  Is delivered in interactions that promote functional language use in meaningful contexts  Provides strategies to facilitate speech  Increases the child’s communication attempts

4 1. Prelinguistic Stage (birth to 1 year) 2. First Words Stage (1 year to 18 months)  Early words learned as whole units (not sequence of segments)  Consonant production variable  Active selection and avoidance strategies used 3. Phonemic Development Stage (18 months to 4 years) 4. Stabilization of the Phonological System Stage (4 to 8 years) 5. Stoel-Gammon & Dunn, 1985

5 Limited sound Inventory Limits vocabulary acquisition Reduces intelligibility Reduces communication attempts Reduces feedback

6  Selecting specific language and speech targets appropriate to the child’s level  Arranging the environment to increase likelihood of child initiations  Prompting the child’s engagement through mirroring and mapping  Responding to the child’s initiations with prompts for elaborated language and speech accuracy  Functionally rewarding the child’s communicative attempts by providing access to desired events  Providing focused feedback regarding the form of the child’s utterance

7  Time delay Least Support  Open questions  Choice questions  Model and expansions  Speech recasting Most Support  Repeating target words the child uses while emphasizing a target sound in the word

8  Behavioral ◦ Prompting strategies ◦ Imitation and production practice ◦ Contingencies for child’s communicative attempts  Developmental-Social Interactionist ◦ Language learned in meaningful contexts ◦ Responsiveness of the caregiver  Parents as speech-language facilitators

9 Expand sound Inventory Increase vocabulary Improved intelligibility Increase communication attempts Increase and Focus feedback Target Selection EMT/PE Responsive interaction & Environmental arrangement Child Outcome

10  To assess the efficacy of an early intervention “Enhanced Milieu Teaching with Phonological Emphasis (EMT/PE)” on the speech and language development of children with CLP under 3 years of age. ◦ 48 children were randomly assigned to the EMT/PE intervention or a “business as usual” control

11  Speech and language measures pre and post intervention ◦ 27 children with CLP who have completed the intervention  14 children in the EMT/PE intervention  13 children in the BAU  Compare to normative speech measures ◦ 40 noncleft children at 18, 24, 30 and 36 months

12  15-36 months of age  Non syndromic cleft lip and/or palate  Palate repair <13 months  Absence of sensorineural hearing loss  English is the language of the home  At least 5 words reported by parent  Able to imitate words  Recruited from 3 sites in middle and east Tennessee

13 EMT/PEBAU Gender Male Female 8686 8585 Cleft Type Cleft Palate CLP 2 12 2 11 Mother’s Education HS Some College College Grad Grad School 46314631 15521552

14 EMT/PE Mean EMT/PE SD EMT/PE Range BAU Mean BAU SD BAU Range Age Pre-TX24.3 M7.114, 3226.6 M7.216, 32 Age Post-TX33.4 M7.023, 3534.7 M7.723, 36 Mother’s Age29.5 Y4.222, 3529.6 Y5.221, 37 Age of Palate Repair11.5 M1.09, 1211.1 M1.09, 13

15  Pre-Post Assessment ◦ Profiles of Early Expressive Phonological Skills (PEEPS) ◦ Preschool Language Scale-4 ◦ Language sample  Clinician-child (Play)  Parent-child (Play, book, snack) ◦ Communicative Development Inventory ◦ LENA (Weekday, weekend) ◦ Bayley Scales of Infant Development ◦ Parenting Stress Inventory ◦ Hearing screen

16  EMT/PE Intervention ◦ Clinician implemented ◦ 48 sessions ◦ 5 speech targets identified from single word naming test (PEEPS) embedded in language goals ◦ 5 play activities with at least 2 targets in each session ◦ Criteria for exposure: At least 10 presentations of the targets in each play activity

17  BAU Control ◦ Clinician implemented ◦ 48 sessions  Characteristics of BAU Interventions Total Children Oral Motor/ Massage SpeechLanguageOther 1312824

18

19  Pre and post intervention assessments were compared using OLS regression models controlling for age, study group and pre intervention performance.

20 Outcome Measure tpEffect Size PLS4-AC2.020.043*0.39 PLS4-EC2.590.021*0.43 MCDI Total Words 1.170.260.40 # Different Words 2.310.048*0.45 Word per minute0.880.400.32 MLUm0.260.800.05 LENA voc0.250.810.10

21  The EMT/PE intervention group showed significantly greater gains in ◦ Global language comprehension scores ◦ Global expressive language scores ◦ Number of different words used in conversation ◦ Greater vocabulary size rated by parents  EMT/PE intervention group used 95.8 more words

22

23  Assesses developmentally appropriate sound production in single words ◦ consonant inventory ◦ place/manner of articulation ◦ syllable structure ◦ accuracy ◦ error patterns  18-36 months of age  Elicited with objects

24  40 words  The words were selected based on ◦ age of acquisition (AOA) based on vocabulary words from the MacArthur Communicative Development Inventories ◦ phonetic characteristics to elicit target English consonants across all place, voice, and manner categories of production, as well as in different syllable structures and word position.

25  Consonant Inventory ◦ Initial ◦ Medial/Final  Percent Consonants Correct  Error Types ◦ Substitutions ◦ Omissions ◦ Compensatory substitutions

26

27

28

29

30

31

32

33

34

35 Expand sound Inventory Increase vocabulary Improved intelligibility Increase communication attempts Increase and Focus feedback Consonant inventory Speech accuracy Reduced compensatory articulation Percent intelligibility # Different words Vocabulary size

36  Significant changes were found in both speech and vocabulary ◦ Coherence with typical acquisition

37  Our families who participated in the research  Our Vanderbilt and ETSU research teams  Our funding agency: NIDCD


Download ppt "Nancy J. Scherer A. Lynn Williams East Tennessee State University Ann Kaiser, Megan Roberts, Jennifer Frey, Kristin Mullins Vanderbilt University Carol."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google