Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Chicago, Illinois Michael Gramarossa, BAE/MAE Mechanical Option Advisor: Dr. James Freihaut JGMA.

Published byHerbert Goodman Modified over 9 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "Chicago, Illinois Michael Gramarossa, BAE/MAE Mechanical Option Advisor: Dr. James Freihaut JGMA."— Presentation transcript:

1 Chicago, Illinois Michael Gramarossa, BAE/MAE Mechanical Option Advisor: Dr. James Freihaut JGMA

2  Building Summary  Thesis Objective  Mechanical Depth  Structural Breadth  Electrical Breadth  Evaluation and Conclusion JGMA

3 Michael GramarossaNortheastern Illinois University’s El CentroMechanical Option  Building Summary  Overview  Existing Mechanical System  Cooling and Ventilation  Heating  Thesis Objective  Mechanical Depth  Structural Breadth  Electrical Breadth  Evaluation & Conclusion Site and Location Chicago Illinois Summer: 91.9 °F (0.4%) Winter -4.0°F (99.6%)

4 Michael GramarossaNortheastern Illinois University’s El CentroMechanical Option Site and Location Chicago Illinois Summer: 91.9 °F (0.4%) Winter -4.0°F (99.6%) Located along Kennedy Expressway  Building Summary  Overview  Existing Mechanical System  Cooling and Ventilation  Heating  Thesis Objective  Mechanical Depth  Structural Breadth  Electrical Breadth  Evaluation & Conclusion

5 Michael GramarossaNortheastern Illinois University’s El CentroMechanical Option Site and Location Chicago Illinois Summer: 91.9 °F (0.4%) Winter -4.0°F (99.6%) Located along Kennedy Expressway Passed by 400,000 vehicles each day  Building Summary  Overview  Existing Mechanical System  Cooling and Ventilation  Heating  Thesis Objective  Mechanical Depth  Structural Breadth  Electrical Breadth  Evaluation & Conclusion

6 Michael GramarossaNortheastern Illinois University’s El CentroMechanical Option Recently completed in September 2014 3 stories (no basement) 55,000 ft 2 Classrooms, offices, labs, lounges, etc. Architecture and Façade  Building Summary  Overview  Existing Mechanical System  Cooling and Ventilation  Heating  Thesis Objective  Mechanical Depth  Structural Breadth  Electrical Breadth  Evaluation & Conclusion JGMA

7 Michael GramarossaNortheastern Illinois University’s El CentroMechanical Option Architecture and Façade Recently completed in September 2014 3 stories (no basement) 55,000 ft 2 Classrooms, offices, labs, lounges, etc. Curtain Wall Façade with solar fins Blue and Gold Fins  Building Summary  Overview  Existing Mechanical System  Cooling and Ventilation  Heating  Thesis Objective  Mechanical Depth  Structural Breadth  Electrical Breadth  Evaluation & Conclusion JGMA Chicagoarchitectue.com

8 Michael GramarossaNortheastern Illinois University’s El CentroMechanical Option [2] 100 ton air handling roof top units (RTUs) The RTUs supply 55°F air year round Existing Mechanical System Cooling and Ventilation  Building Summary  Overview  Existing Mechanical System  Cooling and Ventilation  Heating  Thesis Objective  Mechanical Depth  Structural Breadth  Electrical Breadth  Evaluation & Conclusion JGMA

9 Michael GramarossaNortheastern Illinois University’s El CentroMechanical Option Unit Area Served (ft 2 ) Supply Capacity (CFM) Ventilation (CFM) Cooling (Ton) Heating (MBh) RTU-124,00038,00012,0001001250 RTU-227,80038,00012,0001001250 Existing Mechanical System Cooling and Ventilation [2] 100 ton air handling roof top units (RTUs) The RTUs supply 55°F air year round RTU-1 & RTU-2 Separate Air Cooled Condensing Units (CU-1 & CU-2)  Building Summary  Overview  Existing Mechanical System  Cooling and Ventilation  Heating  Thesis Objective  Mechanical Depth  Structural Breadth  Electrical Breadth  Evaluation & Conclusion JGMA

10 Michael GramarossaNortheastern Illinois University’s El CentroMechanical Option Existing Mechanical System Heating Tag Fuel Type Rating (MBH) Water Temperature (°F) Flow Rate (GPM) Min. Thermal Efficiency (%) InputOutputEnteringLeaving B-1NG7506571301506690 B-2NG7506571301506690 [2] 750 MBh Boilers Boilers serve 71 VAV reheat coils and hot water radiant finned tubes  Building Summary  Overview  Existing Mechanical System  Cooling and Ventilation  Heating  Thesis Objective  Mechanical Depth  Structural Breadth  Electrical Breadth  Evaluation & Conclusion

11 Michael GramarossaNortheastern Illinois University’s El CentroMechanical Option Existing Mechanical System Heating Second Floor Plan Hot Water Schematic Tag Fuel Type Rating (MBH) Water Temperature (°F) Flow Rate (GPM) Min. Thermal Efficiency (%) InputOutputEnteringLeaving B-1NG7506571301506690 B-2NG7506571301506690 [2] 750 MBh Boilers Boilers serve 71 VAV reheat coils and hot water radiant finned tubes  Building Summary  Overview  Existing Mechanical System  Cooling and Ventilation  Heating  Thesis Objective  Mechanical Depth  Structural Breadth  Electrical Breadth  Evaluation & Conclusion

12 Michael GramarossaNortheastern Illinois University’s El CentroMechanical Option The Chicago Building Code (CBC) requires a certain amount of airflow be supplied to a space regardless of the load  Building Summary  Thesis Objective  Mechanical Depth  Structural Breadth  Electrical Breadth  Evaluation and Conclusion Thesis Objective

13 Michael GramarossaNortheastern Illinois University’s El CentroMechanical Option The Chicago Building Code (CBC) requires a certain amount of airflow be supplied to a space regardless of the load Redesign the current mechanical system according to the International Building Code (IBC) Thesis Objective  Building Summary  Thesis Objective  Mechanical Depth  Structural Breadth  Electrical Breadth  Evaluation and Conclusion

14 Michael GramarossaNortheastern Illinois University’s El CentroMechanical Option Thesis Objective The Chicago Building Code (CBC) requires a certain amount of airflow be supplied to a space regardless of the load Redesign the current mechanical system according to the International Building Code (IBC) What are the greater implications if all mechanical systems for commercial buildings in Chicago were designed to the IBC rather than CBC.  Building Summary  Thesis Objective  Mechanical Depth  Structural Breadth  Electrical Breadth  Evaluation and Conclusion fineartamerica.com

15 Michael GramarossaNortheastern Illinois University’s El CentroMechanical Option  Building Summary  Thesis Objective  Mechanical Depth  RTU Resize  Energy Savings  Emission Savings  Structural Breadth  Electrical Breadth  Evaluation and Conclusion RTU Resize System CBCIBC/IMC % Saved Req'd OA (CFM) RTU-1 Total9260576137.79% RTU-2 Total10890829223.86% System Total201501405330.26% Ventilation Requirements System CBCIBC/IMC Cooling (Tons) Supply Air (CFM) Cooling (Tons) Supply Air (CFM) RTU-19320,7008420,700 RTU-29722,1008922,100 Total19042,80017342,800 % Saved-9.10%0% Load Requirements

16 Michael GramarossaNortheastern Illinois University’s El CentroMechanical Option System CBCIBC/IMC % Saved Req'd OA (CFM) RTU-1 Total9260576137.79% RTU-2 Total10890829223.86% System Total201501405330.26% Ventilation Requirements System CBCIBC/IMC Cooling (Tons) Supply Air (CFM) Cooling (Tons) Supply Air (CFM) RTU-19320,7008420,700 RTU-29722,1008922,100 Total19042,80017342,800 % Saved-9.10%0% Load Requirements Carrier model number chosenRTU Resize  Building Summary  Thesis Objective  Mechanical Depth  RTU Resize  Energy Savings  Emission Savings  Structural Breadth  Electrical Breadth  Evaluation and Conclusion carrier.com

17 Michael GramarossaNortheastern Illinois University’s El CentroMechanical Option System CBCIBC/IMC % Saved Req'd OA (CFM) RTU-1 Total9260576137.79% RTU-2 Total10890829223.86% System Total201501405330.26% Ventilation Requirements System CBCIBC/IMC Cooling (Tons) Supply Air (CFM) Cooling (Tons) Supply Air (CFM) RTU-19320,7008420,700 RTU-29722,1008922,100 Total19042,80017342,800 % Saved-9.10%0% Load Requirements Carrier model number chosen Low Gas Heat Capacity: 527 MBH High Gas Heat Capacity: 790 MBH RTU Resize  Building Summary  Thesis Objective  Mechanical Depth  RTU Resize  Energy Savings  Emission Savings  Structural Breadth  Electrical Breadth  Evaluation and Conclusion

18 Michael GramarossaNortheastern Illinois University’s El CentroMechanical Option or… Fan Selection RTU Resize  Building Summary  Thesis Objective  Mechanical Depth  RTU Resize  Energy Savings  Emission Savings  Structural Breadth  Electrical Breadth  Evaluation and Conclusion trane.com

19 Michael GramarossaNortheastern Illinois University’s El CentroMechanical Option Fan Selection or… RTU Resize  Building Summary  Thesis Objective  Mechanical Depth  RTU Resize  Energy Savings  Emission Savings  Structural Breadth  Electrical Breadth  Evaluation and Conclusion trane.com

20 Michael GramarossaNortheastern Illinois University’s El CentroMechanical Option RTU Schematic RTU Resize  Building Summary  Thesis Objective  Mechanical Depth  RTU Resize  Energy Savings  Emission Savings  Structural Breadth  Electrical Breadth  Evaluation and Conclusion

21 Michael GramarossaNortheastern Illinois University’s El CentroMechanical Option RTU Schematic RTU Resize CodeRTU Size Cost (incl. O&P) Location Factor Adjusted Cost Qty. of RTUs Total Cost CBC105 tons$252,000113.6%$286,2722$572,544 IBC/IMC90 tons$225,500113.6%$256,1682$512,336 Potential Savings 10.5% $60,000  Building Summary  Thesis Objective  Mechanical Depth  RTU Resize  Energy Savings  Emission Savings  Structural Breadth  Electrical Breadth  Evaluation and Conclusion

22 Michael GramarossaNortheastern Illinois University’s El CentroMechanical Option Annual Utility Usage CBCIBC/IMC Elec Used (kWh) NG Used (therms) Total Utility Cost Elec Used (kWh) NG Used (therms) Total Utility Cost 727,0009,600$65,500723,0007,400$63,700 Savings0.5%29.5%2.9% Electricity Cost Savings: 0.5% Natural Gas Cost Savings: 29.5% Total Utility Cost Savings: 2.9% Electric & NG Cost Savings: $1800  Building Summary  Thesis Objective  Mechanical Depth  RTU Resize  Energy Savings  Emission Savings  Structural Breadth  Electrical Breadth  Evaluation and Conclusion

23 Michael GramarossaNortheastern Illinois University’s El CentroMechanical Option Annual Utility UsageWhy are there more energy savings in the heating system than the cooling system? CBCIBC/IMC Elec Used (kWh) NG Used (therms) Total Utility Cost Elec Used (kWh) NG Used (therms) Total Utility Cost 727,0009,600$65,500723,0007,400$63,700 Savings0.5%29.5%2.9% CBC IBC/IMC  Building Summary  Thesis Objective  Mechanical Depth  RTU Resize  Energy Savings  Emission Savings  Structural Breadth  Electrical Breadth  Evaluation and Conclusion

24 Michael GramarossaNortheastern Illinois University’s El CentroMechanical Option Annual Utility UsageWhy are there more energy savings in the heating system than the cooling system? Cooling Degree Days 842 Heating Degree Days 6311 CBCIBC/IMC Elec Used (kWh) NG Used (therms) Total Utility Cost Elec Used (kWh) NG Used (therms) Total Utility Cost 727,0009,600$65,500723,0007,400$63,700 Savings0.5%29.5%2.9% CBC IBC/IMC  Building Summary  Thesis Objective  Mechanical Depth  RTU Resize  Energy Savings  Emission Savings  Structural Breadth  Electrical Breadth  Evaluation and Conclusion

25 Michael GramarossaNortheastern Illinois University’s El CentroMechanical Option Annual Utility Usage CBCIBC/IMC Elec Used (kWh) NG Used (therms) Total Utility Cost Elec Used (kWh) NG Used (therms) Total Utility Cost 727,0009,600$65,500723,0007,400$63,700 Savings0.5%29.5%2.9% CBC IBC/IMC  Building Summary  Thesis Objective  Mechanical Depth  RTU Resize  Energy Savings  Emission Savings  Structural Breadth  Electrical Breadth  Evaluation and Conclusion

26 Michael GramarossaNortheastern Illinois University’s El CentroMechanical Option Annual Utility Usage CBCIBC/IMC Elec Used (kWh) NG Used (therms) Total Utility Cost Elec Used (kWh) NG Used (therms) Total Utility Cost 727,0009,600$65,500723,0007,400$63,700 Savings0.5%29.5%2.9% CBC IBC/IMC  Building Summary  Thesis Objective  Mechanical Depth  RTU Resize  Energy Savings  Emission Savings  Structural Breadth  Electrical Breadth  Evaluation and Conclusion

27 Michael GramarossaNortheastern Illinois University’s El CentroMechanical Option Emission Savings Emission Savings ~37,000 lbs. CO 2e per year  Building Summary  Thesis Objective  Mechanical Depth  RTU Resize  Energy Savings  Emission Savings  Structural Breadth  Electrical Breadth  Evaluation and Conclusion

28 Michael GramarossaNortheastern Illinois University’s El CentroMechanical Option Structural Breadth  Building Summary  Thesis Objective  Mechanical Depth  Structural Breadth  RTU-2  RTU-1  Conclusion  Electrical Breadth  Evaluation & Conclusion Will smaller RTU’s designed according to the IBC lead to a reduction in structural steel?

29 Michael GramarossaNortheastern Illinois University’s El CentroMechanical Option Structural Breadth Load TypeMaterial Weight (psf) Dead Load PVC Roof10 1/2" Cover Board2 R-30 Insulation Board2 Galvanized Metal Deck2 Misc. (lights, duct, PV array, etc.)10 Live Load or Snow Load Live Load20 Snow Load25 Total Dead Load26 Snow Load25  Building Summary  Thesis Objective  Mechanical Depth  Structural Breadth  RTU-2  RTU-1  Conclusion  Electrical Breadth  Evaluation & Conclusion

30 Michael GramarossaNortheastern Illinois University’s El CentroMechanical Option N C8x11.5  Building Summary  Thesis Objective  Mechanical Depth  Structural Breadth  RTU-2  RTU-1  Conclusion  Electrical Breadth  Evaluation & Conclusion RTU-2 Analysis

31 Michael GramarossaNortheastern Illinois University’s El CentroMechanical Option N C8x11.5  Building Summary  Thesis Objective  Mechanical Depth  Structural Breadth  RTU-2  RTU-1  Conclusion  Electrical Breadth  Evaluation & Conclusion RTU-2 Analysis

32 Michael GramarossaNortheastern Illinois University’s El CentroMechanical Option N C8x11.5  Building Summary  Thesis Objective  Mechanical Depth  Structural Breadth  RTU-2  RTU-1  Conclusion  Electrical Breadth  Evaluation & Conclusion RTU-2 Analysis

33 Michael GramarossaNortheastern Illinois University’s El CentroMechanical Option N C8x11.5  Building Summary  Thesis Objective  Mechanical Depth  Structural Breadth  RTU-2  RTU-1  Conclusion  Electrical Breadth  Evaluation & Conclusion RTU-2 Analysis

34 Michael GramarossaNortheastern Illinois University’s El CentroMechanical Option  Building Summary  Thesis Objective  Mechanical Depth  Structural Breadth  RTU-2  RTU-1  Conclusion  Electrical Breadth  Evaluation & Conclusion RTU-1 Analysis These beams are not reduced in size because the structural engineer did not use a smaller beam than W12x26.

35 Michael GramarossaNortheastern Illinois University’s El CentroMechanical Option  Building Summary  Thesis Objective  Mechanical Depth  Structural Breadth  RTU-2  RTU-1  Conclusion  Electrical Breadth  Evaluation & Conclusion Structural Breadth Conclusion Beam Size Existing DesignNew Design Cost ($/LF) Length (ft) C8x11.5151124$83.68 W21x44051$84.21 W21x48510$94.34 Total Cost$17,447$14,671 New design leads to $2,800 in savings

36 Michael GramarossaNortheastern Illinois University’s El CentroMechanical Option  Building Summary  Thesis Objective  Mechanical Depth  Structural Breadth  RTU-2  RTU-1  Conclusion  Electrical Breadth  Evaluation & Conclusion Structural Breadth Conclusion Total Cost$17,447$14,671 New design leads to $2,800 in savings Structural steel savings are a result of a different design approach. There would be negligible structural steel savings associated with designing to the IBC rather than the CBC with regards to the mechanical system. Beam Size Existing DesignNew Design Cost ($/LF) Length (ft) C8x11.5151124$83.68 W21x44051$84.21 W21x48510$94.34

37 Michael GramarossaNortheastern Illinois University’s El CentroMechanical Option  Building Summary  Thesis Objective  Mechanical Depth  Structural Breadth  Electrical Breadth  Evaluation & Conclusion Electrical Breadth Will smaller RTU’s designed according to the IBC lead to a reduction in electrical wiring?

38 Michael GramarossaNortheastern Illinois University’s El CentroMechanical Option  Building Summary  Thesis Objective  Mechanical Depth  Structural Breadth  Electrical Breadth  Evaluation & Conclusion Electrical Breadth New Design Existing Design

39 Michael GramarossaNortheastern Illinois University’s El CentroMechanical Option  Building Summary  Thesis Objective  Mechanical Depth  Structural Breadth  Electrical Breadth  Evaluation & Conclusion Electrical Breadth New Design The same as structural, using the IBC in lieu of the CBC will lead to minimal to no electrical cost savings The savings associated were a result of a different design strategy

40 Michael GramarossaNortheastern Illinois University’s El CentroMechanical Option  Building Summary  Thesis Objective  Mechanical Depth  Structural Breadth  Electrical Breadth  Evaluation & Conclusion  City of Chicago Study  Overall Evaluation  Acknowledgements City of Chicago Study envato.com

41 Michael GramarossaNortheastern Illinois University’s El CentroMechanical Option  Building Summary  Thesis Objective  Mechanical Depth  Structural Breadth  Electrical Breadth  Evaluation & Conclusion  City of Chicago Study  Overall Evaluation  Acknowledgements City of Chicago Study Reduce Chicago’s greenhouse gas emissions by 80% below 1990 levels by 2050 Energy Efficient Buildings (30%) Clean & Renewable Energy Sources (34%) Improved Transportation Options (23%) Reduction Waste & Industrial Pollution (13%) Adaptation envato.com

42 Michael GramarossaNortheastern Illinois University’s El CentroMechanical Option  Building Summary  Thesis Objective  Mechanical Depth  Structural Breadth  Electrical Breadth  Evaluation & Conclusion  City of Chicago Study  Overall Evaluation  Acknowledgements City of Chicago Study Chicago Building Energy $3 billion per year Potential Savings 2.9% $87 million per year envato.com

43 Michael GramarossaNortheastern Illinois University’s El CentroMechanical Option  Building Summary  Thesis Objective  Mechanical Depth  Structural Breadth  Electrical Breadth  Evaluation & Conclusion  City of Chicago Study  Overall Evaluation  Acknowledgements City of Chicago Study Chicago Building Energy $3 billion per year Potential Savings 2.9% $87 million per year Chicago Building Emissions 63 billion lbs. CO 2e per year Potential Savings 2.42% 1.5 billion lbs. CO 2e per year Equivalent to taking 184,000 cars off of the road

44 Michael GramarossaNortheastern Illinois University’s El CentroMechanical Option  Building Summary  Thesis Objective  Mechanical Depth  Structural Breadth  Electrical Breadth  Evaluation & Conclusion  City of Chicago Study  Overall Evaluation  Acknowledgements Overall Evaluation Possible Mechanical First Cost Savings No Structural or Electrical Cost Savings Energy Cost Savings 2.9% Emission Savings 2.42%

45 Michael GramarossaNortheastern Illinois University’s El CentroMechanical Option  Building Summary  Thesis Objective  Mechanical Depth  Structural Breadth  Electrical Breadth  Evaluation & Conclusion  City of Chicago Study  Overall Evaluation  Acknowledgements Overall Evaluation Possible Mechanical First Cost Savings No Structural or Electrical Cost Savings Energy Cost Savings 2.9% Emission Savings 2.42% Minimal Impact on a small scale Big impact on a large scale

46 Michael GramarossaNortheastern Illinois University’s El CentroMechanical Option  Building Summary  Thesis Objective  Mechanical Depth  Structural Breadth  Electrical Breadth  Evaluation & Conclusion  City of Chicago Study  Overall Evaluation  Acknowledgements Acknowledgements Primera Engineers Professor Freihaut Penn State AE Faculty and Staff Friends and Family And of course,

47 Michael GramarossaNortheastern Illinois University’s El CentroMechanical Option  Building Summary  Thesis Objective  Mechanical Depth  Structural Breadth  Electrical Breadth  Evaluation & Conclusion  City of Chicago Study  Overall Evaluation  Acknowledgements Acknowledgements Primera Engineers Professor Freihaut Penn State AE Faculty and Staff Friends and Family And of course, President Obama

48 Michael GramarossaNortheastern Illinois University’s El CentroMechanical Option Questions? Summary of Savings Energy SavingsAnnual Cost SavingsEmission Savings %kBtu/year%$/year%lbs. CO 2e /yr NEIU El Centro 6.70%232,0002.90%$1,8502.42%33,600 City of Chicago 6.70%10.4 billion2.90%$87 million2.42%1.5 billion CBC IBC/IMC

49 Michael GramarossaNortheastern Illinois University’s El CentroMechanical Option Electrical Appendix SystemEquipmentV/PH/HzFLAMOCPkVA Wire (Copper) (THWN) Ground (Copper) Conduit (EMT) Existing RTU-1460/3/60149150 A124(4) #2/0#62" RTU-2460/3/60149150 A124(4) #2/0#62" CU-1460/3/60227250 A189(4) 350 kcmil#43 1/2" CU-2460/3/60227250 A189(4) 350 kcmil#43 1/2" New RTU-1460/3/60257300 A214(4) 300 kcmil#42 1/2" RTU-2460/3/60257300 A214(4) 300 kcmil#42 1/2" Table 26 – Existing and New Branch Wire Sizing for RTUs System Panel Label Equipment Served VoltageFLAkVAMOCP Feeder Size (Copper, THWN, EMT) ExistingDPM3-1RTU-1 & RTU-2480/277298248600 A (2) sets: 4-350 kcmil, #1/0 Grd, 3 1/2" C NewDPM3-1RTU-1 & RTU-2480/277514428800 A (3) sets: 4-300 kcmil, #2 Grd, 2 1/2" C Table 27 – Existing and New Feeder Sizing for RTUs

50 Michael GramarossaNortheastern Illinois University’s El CentroMechanical Option City of Chicago Appendix Total Amount Chicago Spends on Building Energy ($) Potential Savings (%) Potential Savings ($) $3 billion2.90%$87 million Total Amount of Energy Used by Chicago Buildings (kBtu/year) Potential Savings (%) Potential Savings ($/year) 155 billion kBtu6.70%10.4 billion kBtu Unit Total Pollutants Produced by Chicago Buildings (CO 2e /year) Potential Savings (%) Potential Savings (CO 2e /year) lbs. CO 2e /year63 billion lbs.2.42%1.5 billion lbs. tons CO 2e /year31.6 million tons2.42%765,000 tons Equivalent of Cars on the Road per year 7.6 million cars2.42%184,000 cars RankCityCountry No. of Skyscrapers 1Hong KongChina302 2New York CityUnited States235 3DubaiUnited Arab Emirates148 4ShanghaiChina126 5ChicagoUnited States115 6TokyoJapan112 7ChongqingChina94 8GuangzhouChina93 9ShenzhenChina83 10Singapore 79 Building TypekBTU/ft 2 /yr Large Office43 Medium Office48 Small Office51 Warehouse24 Stand-alone Retail81 Strip Mall85 Primary School65 Secondary School76 Supermarket195 Quick Service Restaurant657 Hospital148 Outpatient Facility271 Small Hotel80 Large Hotel138 Mid-Rise Apartment47 NEIU El Centro*62

Download ppt "Chicago, Illinois Michael Gramarossa, BAE/MAE Mechanical Option Advisor: Dr. James Freihaut JGMA."

Similar presentations

DOUG BOSWELL MECHANICAL OPTION APRIL 16, 2008 Temple University Tyler School of Art.

DOUG BOSWELL MECHANICAL OPTION APRIL 16, 2008 Temple University Tyler School of Art.
STEM Center Delaware County Community College – Media, PA Thesis Final Presentation Dan Saxton Mechanical Option.

STEM Center Delaware County Community College – Media, PA Thesis Final Presentation Dan Saxton Mechanical Option.
Energy Conserving Alternatives HVAC 15a CNST 305 Environmental Systems 1 Dr. Berryman.

Energy Conserving Alternatives HVAC 15a CNST 305 Environmental Systems 1 Dr. Berryman.
West Virginia University Alumni Center Gregory Smithmyer | Mechanical Option | Penn State University | April 15, 2009 | Advisor: Dr. Srebric.

West Virginia University Alumni Center Gregory Smithmyer | Mechanical Option | Penn State University | April 15, 2009 | Advisor: Dr. Srebric.
Jacksonville, FL The Pennsylvania State University Department of Architectural Engineering Zachary Polovchik Mechanical Option Advisor – Dustin Eplee Duval.

Jacksonville, FL The Pennsylvania State University Department of Architectural Engineering Zachary Polovchik Mechanical Option Advisor – Dustin Eplee Duval.
WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC NUCLEAR ENGINEERING HEADQUARTERS DANIEL AUGHENBAUGH - MECHANICAL OPTION Westinghouse Nuclear Engineering Headquarters Daniel Aughenbaugh.

WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC NUCLEAR ENGINEERING HEADQUARTERS DANIEL AUGHENBAUGH - MECHANICAL OPTION Westinghouse Nuclear Engineering Headquarters Daniel Aughenbaugh.
 Site  Requirements  Local Resources  Initial layout ideas  Brief material selection  Supply options.

 Site  Requirements  Local Resources  Initial layout ideas  Brief material selection  Supply options.
Coppin State University Physical Education Complex Kaylee Damico – Mechanical Option April 12 th, 2011 Presentation Outline Project Team Project Overview.

Coppin State University Physical Education Complex Kaylee Damico – Mechanical Option April 12 th, 2011 Presentation Outline Project Team Project Overview.
Integration of Mechanical System Redesign Geothermal Heat Pump Redesign Wesley S. Lawson Architectural Engineering Mechanical Option Pennsylvania State.

Integration of Mechanical System Redesign Geothermal Heat Pump Redesign Wesley S. Lawson Architectural Engineering Mechanical Option Pennsylvania State.
Building Systems Integration - Energy and Cost Analysis The Milton Hershey School New Supply Center Justin Bem AE Senior Thesis – Spring 2007 Mechanical.

Building Systems Integration - Energy and Cost Analysis The Milton Hershey School New Supply Center Justin Bem AE Senior Thesis – Spring 2007 Mechanical.
Bowie State University Fine and Performing Arts Center Zachary Lippert Faculty Advisor: Dr. Stephen Treado.

Bowie State University Fine and Performing Arts Center Zachary Lippert Faculty Advisor: Dr. Stephen Treado.
The Edward St. John Student Center Zachary Haupt Faculty Advisor: Dr. William Bahnfleth 11 April 2011.

The Edward St. John Student Center Zachary Haupt Faculty Advisor: Dr. William Bahnfleth 11 April 2011.
Massachusetts High-Performance Green Schools – Case Study Whitman-Hanson Regional High School Library & Media Center. This projects features include utilizing.

Massachusetts High-Performance Green Schools – Case Study Whitman-Hanson Regional High School Library & Media Center. This projects features include utilizing.
BEM CLASS 5 Building Thermodynamics – 2 Air-conditioning Load Calculation – latent heat, solar and internal gains.

BEM CLASS 5 Building Thermodynamics – 2 Air-conditioning Load Calculation – latent heat, solar and internal gains.
North Pocono High School

North Pocono High School
DEA Clandestine Laboratory Training Center Penn State University Architectural Engineering Mechanical Option David M. Potchak.

DEA Clandestine Laboratory Training Center Penn State University Architectural Engineering Mechanical Option David M. Potchak.
Technology and Engineering Development (TED) Building Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Newport News, VA David Blum | Mechanical Option Dustin.

Technology and Engineering Development (TED) Building Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Newport News, VA David Blum | Mechanical Option Dustin.
Announcements Midterm Project Prepare groups of 3 to 4 students You can submit the list at the end of next class Midterm Exam 03/09/10 - In class Exam:

Announcements Midterm Project Prepare groups of 3 to 4 students You can submit the list at the end of next class Midterm Exam 03/09/10 - In class Exam:
CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL Central High School MID-ATLANTIC REGION ADAM BROWN MECHANICAL OPTION SPRING 2014 Introduction Existing Mechanical System Thesis Proposal.

CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL Central High School MID-ATLANTIC REGION ADAM BROWN MECHANICAL OPTION SPRING 2014 Introduction Existing Mechanical System Thesis Proposal.
Presentation Outline Introduction System Optimization Analysis Acoustical Breadth Conclusion Acknowledgements Questions Thesis Final Presentation Army.

Presentation Outline Introduction System Optimization Analysis Acoustical Breadth Conclusion Acknowledgements Questions Thesis Final Presentation Army.

Similar presentations

Ads by Google