1. NUINT11, Dehradun, India March 7-11, 2011 S. Manly, University of Rochester1 eA pion production at CLAS aimed at neutrinos S. Manly & Hyupwoo Lee University of Rochester Department of Physics and Astronomy NUFACT 2013 August 19-24, 2013 Beijing, China Representing the CLAS (EG-2) collaboration

2. 2 Motivation – why eA?   High statistics.   Control over initial energy and interaction point – gives kinematic constraints and ability to optimize detector. S. Manly, University of Rochester Summary slide from talk by Costas Andreopolos at NUINT 2009 “Electron scattering data and its use in constraining neutrino models” NUFACT 2013, Beijing, China August 19-24, 2013

3. S. Manly, University of Rochester3NUFACT 2013, Beijing, China August 19-24, 2013 Why eA? – Discussions at NUFACT R. Subedi et al., Science 320, 1476 (2008) Much of the conversation here at NUFACT regarding oscillations/cross sections has centered around the fact that interactions are on nuclei rather than nucleons Input from eA has been important in helping us understand the potential effects of SRC and MEC, for example

4. S. Manly, University of Rochester4 Neutrino beam Long baseline Measure flux and backgrounds in near detector and propagate to far detector and the uncertainties “cancel out” Cross-sections, nuclear effects and backgrounds don’t cancel simply/completely, even in the limit of identical detectors. Model Even more important if near and far detectors are not the same material GIBUU, Lalakulich and Mosel, NUINT 2012 Why eA? – This work e, NUFACT 2013, Beijing, China August 19-24, 2013

5. S. Manly, University of Rochester5 Why eA? – This work e, NUFACT 2013, Beijing, China August 19-24, 2013 This work aims to produce high statistics, multidimensional, differential, charged pion production measurements on different nuclei. The hope is that this will be useful for learning about and tuning models for FSI.

6. E max ~ 6 GeV I max ~ 200  A Duty Factor ~ 100%  E /E ~ 2.5 10 -5 Beam P ~ 80% CLAS Jefferson Lab (Newport News, Virginia) 6S. Manly, University of Rochester 12 GeV upgrade underway NUFACT 2013, Beijing, China August 19-24, 2013

7. S. Manly, University of Rochester7 CLAS: CEBAF Large Acceptance Spectrometer (Hall B) NUFACT 2013, Beijing, China August 19-24, 2013

8. S. Manly, University of Rochester8 CLAS Single Event Display   Charged particle angles 8 o -144 o   Neutral particle angles 8 o -70 o   Momentum resolution ~0.5% (charged)   Angular resolution ~0.5 mr (charged)   Identification of p,  + /  -, K + /K -, e + /e -, etc. NUFACT 2013, Beijing, China August 19-24, 2013

9. S. Manly, University of Rochester9  CLAS - International collaboration of ~230 scientists  Physics data-taking started in May of 1997  Wide variety of run conditions: e-/  beams, 0.5<E<6 GeV (polarized), 1,2 H, 3,4 He, 12 C, 56 Fe, etc.  EG2 running period for JLab experiments E02-104 (Quark propagation through cold QCD matter) and E02-110 (Q 2 dependence of nuclear transparency for incoherent rho electroproduction)  deuterium, carbon, lead, tin, iron, aluminum  3 running periods: Sept. 2003, Dec. 2003 and Jan. 2004 NUFACT 2013, Beijing, China August 19-24, 2013

10. S. Manly, University of Rochester10 CLAS EG2 Targets  Two targets in the beam simultaneously  2 cm LD2, upstream  Solid target downstream  Six solid targets: -Carbon -Aluminum (2 thicknesses) -Iron-Tin-Lead NUFACT 2013, Beijing, China August 19-24, 2013

11. GENIE eA 11 Using GENIE version 2.5.1 in eA mode with Q 2 >0.5 for acceptance calculations and comparison C. Andreopoulos: GENIE eA mode is a “straightforward adaptation of the neutrino generator”   Use charged lepton predictions of cross-section models: Rein-Sehgal, Bodek-Yang, etc.   Transition region handled as in neutrino mode.   Nuclear model (Bodek-Ritchie, Fermi-Gas) same as in neutrino mode.   Intranuclear cascade (INTRANUKE/hA) same as in neutrino mode.   Small modifications to take into account probe charge for hadronization model and resonance event generation.   In-medium effects to hadronization same as in neutrino mode. 11S. Manly, University of RochesterNUFACT 2013, Beijing, China August 19-24, 2013

12. Samples NUINT11, Dehradun, India March 7-11, 2011 S. Manly, University of Rochester12 EG-2 data sample size (E beam =5.015 GeV): Deuterium + C/Fe/Pb raw events 1.1/2.2/1.5 (  10 9 ) D2/C/Fe/Pb events passing all cuts 28.1/5.0/7.6/2.5 (  10 6 ) Simulated sample size (Genie MC + detector simulation): D2/C/Fe/Pb generated events (4)  1.0  10 8 D2/C/Fe/Pb events passing all cuts 7.9/6.4/5.5/4.8 (  10 6 ) 12S. Manly, University of RochesterNUFACT 2013, Beijing, China August 19-24, 2013

13. Analysis cuts NUINT11, Dehradun, India March 7-11, 2011 S. Manly, University of Rochester13 S. Manly, University of RochesterNUFACT 2013, Beijing, China August 19-24, 2013   Demand electron enter calorimeter safely away from edges   Demand energy deposit as function of depth in ECAL be uneven   Adjust vertex Z position for sector-by-sector beam offset   Demand momentum of outgoing e-: p>0.64 GeV (or y<0.872) (removes bias due to electromagnetic energy threshold in trigger)   Implement “relatively” easy to model cuts in W, Q 2,  for the electron and p ,   for the pion

14. Fiducial volume complications NUINT11, Dehradun, India March 7-11, 2011 14 S. Manly, University of RochesterNUFACT 2013, Beijing, China August 19-24, 2013 Angle with respect to beam Azimuthal angle Six azimuthal regions of angular acceptance that are a function of , p, charge   The optimal fiducial regions for the detector are not conveniently modeled for comparison to calculations

15. Fiducial volume complications NUINT11, Dehradun, India March 7-11, 2011 15 S. Manly, University of RochesterNUFACT 2013, Beijing, China August 19-24, 2013 Angle with respect to beam Azimuthal angle   Report results with geometric correction to be azimuthally symmetric   Implement “relatively” easy to model cuts in W, Q 2,  for the electron and p ,   for the pion

16. S. Manly, University of Rochester16NUFACT 2013, Beijing, China August 19-24, 2013 For  - (  + has distinct but similar cuts)   0.3<p  <2   24 o <   <54 o   red line shown For e -   y>0.872   1GeV 2 <Q 2 <4 GeV 2   1 GeV<W<2.8 GeV   red line shown W = -2.25(GeV -1 )×Q 2 + 4.9(GeV) Θ = -18(GeV-1)×pπ + 40(degrees)

17. S. Manly, University of Rochester17 Radiative corrections   Use “externals_all” routine designed for EG1- DVCS experiment (P. Bosted, EG1-DVCS technical note 5, 2010)   Calculate differential cross sections (W, Q 2 ) with and without QED radiative effects in the process.   Remove (quasi-)elastic contribution (since we demand a pion be present)   Only consider leptonic side (in neutrinos we don’t typically worry about the radiative corrections on the hadronic side) NUFACT 2013, Beijing, China August 19-24, 2013

18. S. Manly, University of Rochester18 Acceptance and bin migration NUFACT 2013, Beijing, China August 19-24, 2013   Work in 4-dimensional space (W, Q 2, p ,   )   Multi-dimensional acceptance correction and bin migration correction from MC (<10%, typically smaller)   Non-acceptance corrected GENIE distributions look very similar to the data distributions – reasonable to use the GENIE samples for the acceptance corrections.   Require at least one π ± reconstructed, take leading pion as the analysis pion   MC indicates single π ± sample to originate from ~40% percent single π ± with most of the rest from multiple π events.   Missing mass analysis improves single-π purity with a big loss in statistics. Not using for current results.

19. Caveats NUINT11, Dehradun, India March 7-11, 2011 S. Manly, University of Rochester19   All results shown here are preliminary   The errors shown are statistical only   Systematic errors are under investigation   Expectation/goal is to hold the systematic errors to <10%   Vast amount of differential data. Only sampling shown here.   Ask if you want to see preliminary result on something I do not have time to show here. 19S. Manly, University of RochesterNUFACT 2013, Beijing, China August 19-24, 2013

20. S. Manly, University of Rochester20 Data-MC comparison (Comparison friendly fiducial region, corrected for acceptance and radiative effects, only statistical errors shown, three variables integrated over) NUFACT 2013, Beijing, China August 19-24, 2013 W,   Data/MC ratio, all targets

21. S. Manly, University of Rochester21 Data-MC comparison (Comparison friendly fiducial region, corrected for acceptance and radiative effects, only statistical errors shown, three variables integrated over) NUFACT 2013, Beijing, China August 19-24, 2013 Q 2,   Data/MC ratio, all targets

22. S. Manly, University of Rochester22 Data-MC comparison (Comparison friendly fiducial region, corrected for acceptance and radiative effects, only statistical errors shown, three variables integrated over) NUFACT 2013, Beijing, China August 19-24, 2013 p ,   Data/MC ratio, all targets

23. S. Manly, University of Rochester23 Data-MC comparison (Comparison friendly fiducial region, corrected for acceptance and radiative effects, only statistical errors shown, three variables integrated over) NUFACT 2013, Beijing, China August 19-24, 2013 p ,  - Data/MC ratio, all targets

24. S. Manly, University of Rochester24 Data-MC comparison (Comparison friendly fiducial region, corrected for acceptance and radiative effects, only statistical errors shown, three variables integrated over) NUFACT 2013, Beijing, China August 19-24, 2013  ,   Data/MC ratio, all targets

25. S. Manly, University of Rochester25 High precision neutrino results are a product of many pieces carefully fit together   CLAS/EG2 is making significant progress toward releasing multi- dimensional precision π ± production cross-sections on different nuclei in a region of phase space relevant for the current precision neutrino physics program. We hope for final results to be released in the next year. NUFACT 2013, Beijing, China August 19-24, 2013 Let’s finish this up. I need to graduate!

26. S. Manly, University of Rochester26NUFACT 2013, Beijing, China August 19-24, 2013 Backup slides

27. S. Manly, University of Rochester27 Motivation – why eA? NUFACT 2013, Beijing, China August 19-24, 2013 Assume quasielastic kinematics to determine E Not a free nucleon in general Well-known “disagreement” calls into question the completeness of our model, perhaps need meson exchange currents and nucleon correlations

28. S. Manly, University of Rochester28NUFACT 2013, Beijing, China August 19-24, 2013 R. Subedi et al., Science 320, 1476 (2008) Short-range correlations between nucleons might change the kinematics and affect ability to identify/reconstruct quasielastic events Genuine quasielastic events Multinucleon events reconstructed as quasielastic Martini et al. arXiv:1211.1523 Also: J. Sobczyk arXiv:1201.3673, Lalakulich et al. arXiv:1208.367 Nieves et al. arXiv:1204:5404 Motivation – why eA?

29. S. Manly, University of Rochester29NUFACT 2013, Beijing, China August 19-24, 2013 Motivation – why eA? Shape-only ratio TEM: emperical, adjust magnetic form factors of bound nucleons to reproduce enhancement in the transverse cross-section in eA scattering attributed to meson exchange currents in the nucleus L. Fields et al., PRL 111, 022501 (2013)G.A. Fiorentini et al., PRL 111, 022502 (2013)

30. S. Manly, University of Rochester30NUFACT 2013, Beijing, China August 19-24, 2013 Motivation – why eA? Consistent with expectation from eA scattering that correlated pairs dominated by np Vertex Energy MINER A event display L. Fields et al., PRL 111, 022501 (2013)G.A. Fiorentini et al., PRL 111, 022502 (2013)

31. The CLAS Collaboration Idaho State University, Pocatello, Idaho INFN, Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati, Frascati, Italy INFN, Sezione di Genova, Genova, Italy Institut de Physique Nucléaire, Orsay, France ITEP, Moscow, Russia James Madison University, Harrisonburg, VA Kyungpook University, Daegu, South Korea University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH Norfolk State University, Norfolk, VA Ohio University, Athens, OH Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY Rice University, Houston, TX University of Richmond, Richmond, VA University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility, Newport News, VA Union College, Schenectady, NY Virginia Polytechnic Institute, Blacksburg, VA University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA College of William and Mary, Williamsburg, VA Yerevan Institute of Physics, Yerevan, Armenia Brazil, Germany, Morocco and Ukraine, Brazil, Germany, Morocco and Ukraine, as well as other institutions in France and in the USA, have individuals or groups involved with CLAS, but with no formal collaboration at this stage. Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ University of California, Los Angeles, CA California State University, Dominguez Hills, CA Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA Catholic University of America CEA-Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette, France Christopher Newport University, Newport News, VA University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT Edinburgh University, Edinburgh, UK Florida International University, Miami, FL Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL George Washington University, Washington, DC University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK NUINT11, Dehradun, India March 7-11, 2011 31S. Manly, University of Rochester

32. 32 Hall B Side View S. Manly, University of RochesterNUFACT 2013, Beijing, China August 19-24, 2013

33. S. Manly, University of Rochester33 Super-conducting toroidal magnet with six kidney-shaped coils 5 m diameter, 5 m long, 5 M-Amp-turns, max. field 2 Tesla NUFACT 2013, Beijing, China August 19-24, 2013

34. S. Manly, University of Rochester34 From Will Brooks at NUINT02 H target with E beam = 4 GeV illustrates the power of CLAS NUFACT 2013, Beijing, China August 19-24, 2013

35. Analysis cuts NUINT11, Dehradun, India March 7-11, 2011 S. Manly, University of Rochester35 Calorimetric fiducial and ID cuts on outgoing e - 35S. Manly, University of RochesterNUFACT 2013, Beijing, China August 19-24, 2013 Stay away from edges Remove events with even energy depostion in the two layers of the ECAL Mostly pions and muons

36. Analysis cuts NUINT11, Dehradun, India March 7-11, 2011 S. Manly, University of Rochester36   Momentum of outgoing e-: p>0.64 GeV (or y<0.872)   Removes bias due to electromagnetic energy threshold in trigger.   Also reduces sensitivity to radiative effects. 36S. Manly, University of RochesterNUFACT 2013, Beijing, China August 19-24, 2013

37. Data-MC comparison (no acceptance corrections, detector optimized fiducial definition) S. Manly, University of Rochester37   GENIE events run through CLAS detector simulation (GSIM) with EG2 target geometry and same analysis chain as data   Require single π ± reconstructed 37 Deuterium Carbon W distribution (other variables integrated over) Preliminary NUFACT 2013, Beijing, China August 19-24, 2013

38. NUINT11, Dehradun, India March 7-11, 2011 S. Manly, University of Rochester38 Deuterium Carbon Q 2 distribution (other variables integrated over) Preliminary 38S. Manly, University of Rochester Data-MC comparison (no acceptance corrections, detector optimized fiducial definition) NUFACT 2013, Beijing, China August 19-24, 2013

39. NUINT11, Dehradun, India March 7-11, 2011 S. Manly, University of Rochester39 S. Manly, University of Rochester Deuterium Carbon Preliminary Momentum of π in the lab frame (other variables integrated over) Data-MC comparison (no acceptance corrections, detector optimized fiducial definition) NUFACT 2013, Beijing, China August 19-24, 2013

40. NUINT11, Dehradun, India March 7-11, 2011 S. Manly, University of Rochester40 Angle of π with respect to the beam direction (other variables integrated over) Deuterium Carbon Preliminary 40S. Manly, University of Rochester Data-MC comparison (no acceptance corrections, detector optimized fiducial definition) NUFACT 2013, Beijing, China August 19-24, 2013