Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byJemima Singleton Modified over 9 years ago
1
AIDS AND STIGMA G.M. Herek, 1999
2
AIDS-RELATED STIGMA AIDS-related stigma refers to "prejudice, discounting, discrediting, and discrimination against people perceived to have AIDS or HIV, and the individuals, groups and communities with which they are associated" 2
3
AIDS STIGMA IN THE US AND BEYOND PWAs/PWHIVs are stigmatized throughout the world to varying degrees, in different ways, e.g., Social ostracism and personal rejection of PWHIVs Discrimination against PWHIVs Laws depriving PWHIVs of basic human rights AIDS stigma is effectively universal, but takes different forms country to country, and specific targets vary In US, in1992, 21% of PWHIVs experienced violence in their communities because of their HIV status 3
4
THE SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY OF AIDS STIGMA Empirical studies conceptualize AIDS stigma as a psychological attitude or facet of public opinion AIDS manifests 4 characteristics likely to evoke stigma 1) its cause is perceived to be the bearer’s responsibility 2) it is an unalterable or degenerative condition 3) it is a condition perceived to be contagious or dangerous to others 4) it is readily apparent to others, “obtrusive” (Goffman, 1963) 4
5
THE PERSONAL IMPACT OF AIDS STIGMA Fear of AIDS stigma and discrimination may deter those at risk from being tested and seeking info and assistance for risk reduction AIDS stigma affects decisions about disclosing status to others Loved ones of PWAs are at risk for courtesy stigma (Goffman, 1963), risking ostracism and discrimination b/c of their association with a PWHIV Caregivers and advocates for PWAs also at risk for courtesy stigma 5
6
AIDS STIGMA AND PUBLIC POLICY Mass media were initially slow to report on AIDS AIDS stigma and stigma attached to injecting drug use have prevented large-scale implementation of needle-exchange programs Federal law and policy have prevented AIDS educators from providing clear and explicit risk reduction information to individuals at risk AIDS exceptionalism: HIV exempted from traditional public health practices such as partner notification and contact tracing AIDS exceptionalism has diminished over time 6
7
ON BEING SANE IN INSANE PLACES D. L. Rosenhan, 1973
8
PSEUDOPATIENTS AND THEIR SETTINGS 8 "sane" people became "pseudopatients" in 12 hospitals varied ages, men and women, one grad student and three psychologists, a psychiatrist, a painter, a housewife they all used pseudonyms Pseudopatients complained of hallucinations, each with similar symptoms - hearing voices, words like "empty," 'hollow" and "thud" Beyond alleging symptoms, falsifying name, and employment, no other alterations of person or history, no life circumstances were changed significant life events of pseudo-patient were presented as they actually occurred none of the pseudopatients' histories were pathological Upon admission to psychiatric ward, pseudopatients ceased simulating symptoms 8
9
PSYCHIATRIC DIAGNOSIS AS SELF- FULFILLING PROPHECY A psychiatric label has a life and influence of its own, when a sufficient amount of time has passed and no bizarre behavior is shown, patient is considered in remission and available for discharge – but the label endures beyond discharge, influencing family's friend's and patient's own understanding of self The diagnosis acts like a self-fulfilling prophecy eventually patient himself accepts diagnosis and acts accordingly 9
10
THE EXPERIENCE OF PSYCHIATRIC HOSPITALIZATION Term "mental illness" coined by humane people who wanted psychologically disturbed people to be treated more like the physically ill, not like "witches" and "crazies" But the mentally ill still are not treated in same way as physically ill attitudes toward the mentally ill are characterized by fear, aloofness, hostility, suspicion and dread the mentally ill are "society's lepers" Negative attitudes affect general public and professionals - attendants, nurses, physicians, psychologists, and social workers most mental health professionals would insist they are sympathetic, but there's ambivalence such negative attitudes are product of the labels patients wear and the places they are found Consider the structure of the typical psychiatric hospital segregation between staff and patients hierarchical organization, lower-level staff take cues from upper-level, and upper-level spend least time with patients 10
11
POWERLESSNESS AND DEPERSONALIZATION Eye contact and verbal contact reflect concern or individuation Continuous exposure to depersonalization creates deep sense of powerlessness among individuals in psychiatric hospital Signs of powerlessness found everywhere patient deprived of many legal rights due to psychiatric commitment lacks credibility due to psychiatric label lacks freedom of movement cannot initiate eye contact with staff, but may only respond personal privacy is minimal personal history can be accessed by most anyone in facility, as they have easy access to patient files bathroom trips monitored, bathrooms may have no doors In extreme, patients felt invisible 11
12
THE SOURCES OF DEPERSONALIZATION Attitude of all of us toward mentally ill Hierarchical structure of hospital facilitates depersonalization Financial constraints are common in psychiatric institutions, and usually patient contact is the first thing to go 12
13
CONSEQUENCES OF LABELING AND DEPERSONALIZATION Consequences of misdiagnosis of physical & mental illness very different you're relieved when you find out the cancer diagnosis was wrong, but the psychological diagnosis stays with you forever people don't feel threatened by others with a broken leg, but it's different when someone is diagnosed with schizophrenia the label sticks, a mark of inadequacy forever How many are sane outside facility but insane in it, not because of inherent pathology, but because they are responding to the "bizarre" setting? 13
14
SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS We can't distinguish sane from insane inside psychiatric hospital Hospital itself imposes a special environment in which the meanings of behavior can be easily misunderstood Consequences to people hospitalized in such an environment – powerlessness, depersonalization, segregation, mortification, and self-labeling – are counter-therapeutic Solutions? avoid psychiatric labels, focus on specific problems and behaviors, and retain the individual in a relatively non-perjorative environment Treatment of patients did not derive from malice or stupidity by the staff Staff also affected by environment, their perceptions and behavior were controlled by the situation In a more benign environment, one less attached to global diagnosis, their behavior might have been more benign and effective 14
15
LABELING THEORY Labeling theory assumes that public labeling, or branding, as deviant, has adverse consequences for further social participation and self-image the most important drastic change is in public identity, which is a crucial step towards building a long-term “deviant career” 15
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.