1. CHAPTER 10 NOTES (PART 2) PHILOSOPHY 104

2. POSITIVE CONCLUSIONS Neither Necessary nor sufficient conditions are necessarily causes, however, they are likely candidates to be part or all of a causal explanation. Some things, however, can be causes without being either necessary or sufficient. For Example…

3. CAUSAL? Does cigarette smoking cause lung cancer? Is cigarette smoking a necessary condition for lung cancer?

4. CAUSAL? Does cigarette smoking cause lung cancer? Is cigarette smoking a necessary condition for lung cancer? That is, does everyone who gets lung cancer smoke? Is it possible to get lung cancer without smoking?

5. CAUSAL? Does cigarette smoking cause lung cancer? Is cigarette smoking a necessary condition for lung cancer? That is, does everyone who gets lung cancer smoke? NO Is it possible to get lung cancer without smoking? YES

6. CAUSAL? Does cigarette smoking cause lung cancer? Is cigarette smoking a necessary condition for lung cancer? NO That is, does everyone who gets lung cancer smoke? NO Is it possible to get lung cancer without smoking? YES

7. CAUSAL? Does cigarette smoking cause lung cancer? Is cigarette smoking a sufficient condition for lung cancer? Does everyone who smokes get lung cancer?

8. CAUSAL? Does cigarette smoking cause lung cancer? Is cigarette smoking a sufficient condition for lung cancer? NO Does everyone who smokes get lung cancer? NO

9. CAUSAL? If smoking causes lung cancer, but is neither necessary nor sufficient, what is going on?

10. CONCOMITANT VARIATION Concomitant Variation means that two (or more) factors vary along with one another.

11. CONCOMITANT VARIATION Concomitant Variation means that two (or more) factors vary along with one another. This is also known as correlation.

12. CONCOMITANT VARIATION Concomitant Variation means that two (or more) factors vary along with one another. This is also known as correlation. positive (When one increases, so does the other; when one decreases, so does the other) negative (When one increases, the other decreases; when one decreases, the other increases).

13. POSITIVE CORRELATION

14. NEGATIVE CORRELATION

16. CORRELATION Remember, correlation IS NOT causation, it merely indicates evidence of a possible causal relationship.

17. CORRELATION Remember, correlation IS NOT causation, it merely indicates evidence of a possible causal relationship. Once we determine the explanation for the correlation, that explanation is the causal factor.

18. CORRELATION Once one thing is correlated with another, there are four logical possibilities:

19. CORRELATION Once one thing is correlated with another, there are four logical possibilities: A is the cause of B B is the cause of A Some third thing causes both The correlation is simply coincidence

20. REVERSE CAUSATION: Does bad posture cause back pain?

21. REVERSE CAUSATION: Does bad posture cause back pain…or does back pain cause bad posture?

22. REVERSE CAUSATION

23. The assumption seems to be that the payment method causes these attitudes and habits. Consider instead that the attitudes cause the payment method. Isn't it more likely that people who are already primarily concerned with costs will be less likely to spend money they don't have? Isn't it more likely that people who think first of what they want and second about what it costs will be more likely to pay with a credit card?

24. UNDERLYING CAUSATION Do leaves falling cause the weather to get colder?

25. UNDERLYING CAUSATION Do leaves falling cause the weather to get colder? Does cold weather cause leaves to fall?

26. UNDERLYING CAUSATION Do leaves falling cause the weather to get colder? Does cold weather cause leaves to fall? No, the decrease in the intensity of solar radiation causes both.

27. EXPLAIN THIS TRUE CORRELATION: There is a positive correlation between height and reading ability.

28. EXPLAIN THIS TRUE CORRELATION: There is a positive correlation between height and reading ability. Age causes both the height increase and the increase in reading ability.

29. A SAMPLE CORRELLATION (COURTESY GREGG EASTERBROOK): “Fact 1: Enthusiasm for football has never been higher -- not just for the NFL, but with young boys and teens. Participation in prep football has increased 21 percent in the past 20 years, by nearly 200,000 boys per year, according to the National Federation of State High School Associations. Many states have begun to allow what is essentially year-round football practice. Youth-league tackle football is expanding. American boys are devoting more time and effort to football than ever before. National Federation of State High School Associations Fact 2: In higher education, student populations are increasingly female. Twenty years ago, there were more men in college than women. Now there are more women, and the ratio of college women to men is rising.”

30. SUPPORTING DATA: “The Atlantic Monthly essayist Hanna Rosin has written, "Women dominate today's colleges and professional schools for every two men who will receive a B.A. this year, three women will." Richard Whitmire's 2009 book "Why Boys Fail" supposes the advantage for women would be even greater if many colleges and universities did not quietly use lower admissions standards for males, fearing a tipping point at which the school would be perceived as a women's college even if it was not.”

31. PROPOSED EXPLANATIONS FOR THE CORRELLATION 1: Having ever-more boys being bashed on the head in football, while more play full-pads tackle at young ages, may be causing brain trauma that makes boys as a group somewhat less likely to succeed as students. In the highly competitive race for college admissions, even a small overall medical disadvantage for boys could matter.

32. SOME DATA: “Is brain harm to boys from football a factor? This new article in the technical journal Neurosurgery finds that suffering two or more concussions during high school days is associated with neurological problems later in life.”This new article in the technical journal Neurosurgery

33. 2: More important, the increasing amount of time high school boys devote to football may be preventing them from having the GPA and extracurriculars that will earn them regular admission to college when recruiters don't come calling.

34. DATA: “Rising interest in athletics cannot in and of itself be the explanation, because in the last generation, girls' and women's participation in athletics has skyrocketed. But there is one sport girls do not play -- football. The gender that plays football is falling behind in college. The gender that does not play football is excelling.”

35. MORE DATA: Traditionally, high school football players struggled in the classroom during the season, then made up ground in the spring: ideally also doing band, theater, the school newspaper or some other extracurricular in the spring. Now, with high school football becoming a year-round activity, the boy who wants to be on the team may have trouble with grades throughout his high school years, while giving up on anything but sports. College admission officers consider extracurriculars quite important. Many boys who spend most of their time and energy during high school on year-round football, then do not get recruited, send to colleges applications listing a low GPA and no extracurriculars. They're up against girls listing a higher GPA and extracurriculars.

36. FOR FURTHER CONSIDERATION: What kinds of further data would strengthen or weaken football as a causal factor in the correlation between its increasing popularity and decreasing male academic performance?