1. Regional Agencies Smart Growth Strategy Bay Area Alliance for Sustainable Development Regional Livability Footprint Project Santa Clara County October 13, 2001 SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT

2. Santa Clara County Co-Sponsors Central Labor Council of the South Bay AFL-CIO CLEAN South Bay Joint Venture: Silicon Valley Network League of Women Voters Los Gatos-Saratoga-Monte Sereno Mid-Peninsula Housing Coalition Mountain View Chamber of Commerce San Francisquito Creek Joint Powers Authority San Jose/Silicon Valley Chamber of Commerce San Jose/Silicon Valley NAACP Santa Clara Basin Watershed Management Initiative Santa Clara County Santa Clara County Cities Association Santa Clara, San Benito County Building Trade Council Santa Clara Valley Water District Silicon Valley Manufacturing Group VTA Congestion Management Program Working Partnerships, USA Special thanks to Santa Clara County, Valley Transit Authority Congestion Management Program, and the Santa Clara County Cities Association for providing food and refreshments for today’s event.

3. SMART GROWTH STRATEGY Regional Agencies Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG) Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD) Bay Conservation and Development Commission (BCDC) Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) SPONSORING AGENCIES SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT

4. REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT Bay Area Alliance for Sustainable Development 45 Member Organizations Steering Committee consists of organizations representing the Three E’s of Smart Growth and Sustainable Development: Government: Association of Bay Area Governments SPONSORING AGENCIES SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT Prosperous Economy: Bay Area Council Quality Environment: Sierra Club Social Equity: Urban Habitat Program

5. 1 million new jobs 1 million more people 265,000 daily in-commuters to the region 150% increase in aggregate traffic congestion Conversion of up to 83,000 acres of currently undeveloped land 44% decrease in households able to afford the median priced home from 1995 to 2001 CONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATION KEY ECONOMIC ISSUES BAY AREA TRENDS SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT Through 2020 1995 to 2001

6. Natural Increase (“Our own children”) Net Migration (“Other People”) CONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATION KEY ECONOMIC ISSUES REGIONAL POPULATION GROWTH 50% (approximate figures) SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT

7. Expand housing? Constrain future job growth? Expand infrastructure to handle in-commuters? Find a smarter way to grow CONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATION KEY ECONOMIC ISSUES CHOICES ABOUT FUTURE GROWTH SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT

8. PHILOSOPHY Broad participation Bottom-up Build on local efforts CONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATION KEY ECONOMIC ISSUES SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT

9. LOCAL EFFORTS CONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATION KEY ECONOMIC ISSUES SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT

10. Smart growth land use changes supported by local governments. A regional incentive package and implementation strategies. A set of smart growth land use projections.GOALSCONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATION KEY ECONOMIC ISSUES SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT

11. The Three E’s of Smart Growth and Sustainable Development: SMART GROWTH PRINCIPLES SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT Prosperous Economy Quality Environment Social Equity

12. Efficiently accommodate projected growth. Provide sufficient affordable housing. Revitalize central cities and older suburbs. Reduce single occupant vehicle trips. Preserve open space and agricultural land. Foster equitable economic development while minimizing displacement. SMART GROWTH PRINCIPLES CONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATION KEY ECONOMIC ISSUES SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT

13. Revitalization of existing communities. Efficient design for edge development. Development near transit service. Mixed use. Efficient density. Mixed incomes. SAMPLE DEVELOPMENT CONCEPTS CONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATION KEY ECONOMIC ISSUES SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT

14. PROCESS Public Workshop Round 1 September and October 2001 Distillation and Analysis Public Workshop Round 2 March and April 2001 Final Steps CONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATION KEY ECONOMIC ISSUES SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT

15. Smart growth principles Land use mapping exercise Regulatory changes and incentives PUBLIC WORKSHOPS - ROUND ONE CONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATION KEY ECONOMIC ISSUES SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT

16. HOUSING UNITS.................... JOBS............................... PROXIMITY OF HSG. TO TRANSIT..... PROXIMITY OF JOBS TO TRANSIT..... OPEN SPACE........................ PEDESTRIAN QUALITY............... PLACES: ANALYTICAL & MAPPING POWER OF GIS PLACE 3 S: ANALYTICAL & MAPPING POWER OF GIS CONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATION KEY ECONOMIC ISSUES SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT WATER CONSUMPTION..............

17. Three region wide thematic alternatives Analysis of alternatives and existing trends: DISTILLATION & ANALYSIS –Housing Affordability –Jobs/Housing Match –Market Displacement and Social Equity –Transportation and Air Quality Modeling –Development Feasibility CONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATION KEY ECONOMIC ISSUES SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT

18. Review results of first workshop. Address subregional issues. Recommend preferred alternative. Develop regulatory changes and incentives. PUBLIC WORKSHOPS - ROUND TWO CONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATION KEY ECONOMIC ISSUES SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT

19. BAASD coordinates a Public Education and Engagement Campaign ABAG Board considers adoption of Projections forecast MTC’s Regional Transportation Plan Other regional plans Regional regulatory changes and incentives Local implementation FINAL STEPS CONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATION KEY ECONOMIC ISSUES SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT

20. General Plans – –Revised Regulatory Framework – –Additional Incentives – –Regional Context Housing Allocations RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER PROCESSES CONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATION KEY ECONOMIC ISSUES SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT

21. RELATIONSHIP TO DRAFT COMPACT CONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATION KEY ECONOMIC ISSUES SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT

22. Housing Availability and Affordability Traffic Mobility and Congestion Open Space and Agricultural Preservation Livability and Community Vitality Social and Economic Equity OUR REGIONAL GROWTH CHALLENGES CONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATION KEY ECONOMIC ISSUES SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT

23. HOUSING AVAILABILITY AND AFFORDABILITY Bay Area Jobs and Employed Residents by County, 2000 200,000 400,000 600,000 800,000 1,000,000 1,200,000 Alameda Contra Costa Marin Napa San Francisco San Mateo Santa Clara Solano Sonoma Total Jobs Total Employed Residents CONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATION KEY ECONOMIC ISSUES SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT

24. Projected Growth in Jobs and Employed Residents 2000-2020 - 50,000 100,000 150,000 200,000 250,000 300,000 Alameda Contra Costa Marin Napa San Francisco San Mateo Santa Clara Solano Sonoma HOUSING AVAILABILITY AND AFFORDABILITY Jobs Employed Residents CONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATION KEY ECONOMIC ISSUES SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT Alameda Contra Costa Marin Napa San Francisco San Mateo Santa Clara Solano Sonoma

25. HOUSING AVAILABILITY AND AFFORDABILITY The jobs/housing challenge 2000-2020 Projected job growth: 230,000 jobs Resulting housing need: 130,000-135,000 units CONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATION KEY ECONOMIC ISSUES SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT

26. HOUSING AVAILABILITY AND AFFORDABILITY Affordability Gap for Median-Income Households - $100,000 $200,000 $300,000 $400,000 $500,000 $600,000 Contra Costa / Alameda San Francisco/ San Mateo/Marin Santa Clara County Sonoma County Solano/Napa Home Price Affordable to Median 4 Person Household Median Home Market Price CONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATION KEY ECONOMIC ISSUES SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT

27. INCOME CATEGORIES FOR A FAMILY OF FOUR Median Income - $87,300 VERY LOW INCOME 0-$43,650 — Child Care Worker$16,960 — Medical Assistant$23,520 — Retail Clerk $21,290 LOW INCOME $43,650-$69,840 — Accountant $46,300 — Elementary School Teacher $46,860 MODERATE INCOME $69,840-$104,760 — Computer Progammer $70,070 HOUSING AVAILABILITY AND AFFORDABILITY CONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATION KEY ECONOMIC ISSUES SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT — Fire Fighter$44,390 — Financial Manger $76,020

28. HOUSING AVAILABILITY AND AFFORDABILITY Housing need by affordability category: Very low income: 20% Low income: 9% Moderate income: 27% Above moderate income: 44% CONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATION KEY ECONOMIC ISSUES SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT

29. HOUSEHOLD COMPOSITION 2000 BAY AREA HOUSING PERMITS JAN-SEP 2000 SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED 63% MULTI-FAMILY 37% SINGLE PARENTS WITH CHILDREN 8% SINGLES 30% FAMILIES WITH CHILDREN 26% FAMILIES WITH NO CHILDREN 36% HOUSING AVAILABILITY AND AFFORDABILITY CONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATION KEY ECONOMIC ISSUES SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT

30. Ohlone-Chynoweth Commons Affordable Housing San Jose HOUSING AVAILABILITY AND AFFORDABILITY SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT

31. YWCA Villa Nueva Affordable Housing San Jose HOUSING AVAILABILITY AND AFFORDABILITY SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT

32. Westmont Senior Housing Santa Clara HOUSING AVAILABILITY AND AFFORDABILITY SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT

33. In-Law Unit HOUSING AVAILABILITY AND AFFORDABILITY CONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATION KEY ECONOMIC ISSUES SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT

34. 0 200,000 400,000 600,000 800,000 Vehicle-Hours of Delay 150% Increase 2025 339,100 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% VMT Increasing Faster Than Population 2000-2020 VMT Increase Population Increase 14% 28 % 1998 TRAFFIC MOBILITY AND CONGESTION CONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATION KEY ECONOMIC ISSUES SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT 854,600 100,000 300,000 500,000 700,000 900,000

35. 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 19902020 Commute Mode Split Remains Unchanged (millions of trips/day) 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 19902020 In-Commuters to Bay Area Increase (thousands of persons/year) Cars Transit Walk, bike TRAFFIC MOBILITY AND CONGESTION CONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATION KEY ECONOMIC ISSUES SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT

36. San Jose Total Trips: 3,000 Palo Alto Mountain View Santa Clara Milpitas Sunnyvale Source: San Joaquin Partnership Altamont Pass Commuter Survey, Oct 2000 ALTAMONT PASS AUTO A.M. PEAK DESTINATIONS CONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATION KEY ECONOMIC ISSUES SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT

37. SANTA CLARA COUNTY DAILY COMMUTERS CONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATION KEY ECONOMIC ISSUES SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT Monterey County 8,041 San Benito County 15,77 2 Santa Cruz County 32,36 6

38. Vehicle Miles Traveled Per Year 6,455 4,779 10,591 0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 Urban Center Traditional Neighborhood Suburban Neighborhood TRAFFIC MOBILITY AND CONGESTION CONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATION KEY ECONOMIC ISSUES SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT (San Francisco) (Rockridge)(San Ramon)

39. CONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATION KEY ECONOMIC ISSUES SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT TRAFFIC MOBILITY AND CONGESTION

40. Illustrations from Urban Advantage CONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATION KEY ECONOMIC ISSUES TRAFFIC MOBILITY AND CONGESTION SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT Villa Torino San Jose

41. Multimodal Tranist Station Sunnyvale Illustrations from Urban Advantage CONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATION KEY ECONOMIC ISSUES TRAFFIC MOBILITY AND CONGESTION SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT

42. The Crossings Mountain View TRAFFIC MOBILITY AND CONGESTION SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT

43. Illustrations from Urban Advantage CONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATION KEY ECONOMIC ISSUES TRAFFIC MOBILITY AND CONGESTION SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT Parc Metropolitan Milpitas

44. OPEN SPACE AND AGRICULTURAL PRESERVATION CONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATION KEY ECONOMIC ISSUES SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT Henry W. Coe State Park

45. Land has been urbanized 2 1/2 times faster than urban population has increased Urban Population OPEN SPACE AND AGRICULTURAL PRESERVATION CONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATION KEY ECONOMIC ISSUES SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT Urbanized Land Population (millions) Urbanized Land (square miles) 100 200 300 400 15,000 30,000 45,000 60,000 Urban Population Urbanized Land Population (millions) Urbanized Land (square miles) 100 200 300 400 15,000 30,000 45,000 60,000 70 13,000 150 60,000 1950 1990 Source: National Geographic

46. Projected for Development Through 2020 Public Land or Privately Protected Land Conservation Easement Owned in Fee Urban Areas OPEN SPACE AND AGRICULTURAL PRESERVATION CONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATION KEY ECONOMIC ISSUES SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT Lands Projected for Development through 2020 9,000 acres subject to conversion

47. OPEN SPACE AND AGRICULTURAL PRESERVATION CONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATION KEY ECONOMIC ISSUES SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT Urban Growth Boundaries

48. LIVABILITY AND COMMUNITY VITALITY CONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATION KEY ECONOMIC ISSUES SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT Gateway Boulevard, Sunnyvale

49. LIVABILITY AND COMMUNITY VITALITY CONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATION KEY ECONOMIC ISSUES SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT Santa Clara

50. LIVABILITY AND COMMUNITY VITALITY CONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATION KEY ECONOMIC ISSUES SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT North 1st Street, San Jose

51. SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC EQUITY The Bay Area’s 46 Most Impoverished Neighborhoods (NCCC 1997) Very low-income neighborhoods need reinvestment while minimizing displacement These neighborhood residents need access to quality jobs CONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATION KEY ECONOMIC ISSUES SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT

52. Definition of Impoverished Community: Areas where a majority of households earn less than 80% of the County median income (1990) SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC EQUITY SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT Impoverished Communities In Santa Clara County

53. SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC EQUITY SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT Educational Attainment 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Santa Clara CountyEast San Jose Graduate or Professional Degree Bachelor's Degree Associate Degree Some College, No Degree High School Graduate (Includes Equivalency) 9th to 12th Grade, No Diploma Less than 9th Grade

54. SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC EQUITY East San Jose Impoverishment = An Under-served Community: Limited employment opportunities near housing Fewer licensed child care facilities Only one grocery store Fewer Parks CONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATION KEY ECONOMIC ISSUES SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT

55. Impoverished neighborhoods: Can benefit from Smart Growth May be significantly affected by Smart Growth SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC EQUITY CONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATION KEY ECONOMIC ISSUES SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT

56. Regional Agencies Smart Growth Strategy Bay Area Alliance for Sustainable Development Regional Livability Footprint Project Santa Clara County October 13, 2001 SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT

57. SMALL GROUP EXERCISE GOAL Identify the most appropriate patterns for smart growth in Santa Clara County. CONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATION KEY ECONOMIC ISSUES SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT

58. SMALL GROUP EXERCISE Smart Growth Principles Land Use Mapping Exercise Affordable Housing Regulatory Changes and Incentives CONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATION KEY ECONOMIC ISSUES SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT

59. PRINCIPLESCONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATION KEY ECONOMIC ISSUES SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT Review principles generated this morning. Add additional principles if desired.

60. MAPPING EXERCISE Planning Areas Planning Area Categories Place Types Predictors CONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATION KEY ECONOMIC ISSUES SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT

61. PLANNING AREAS CONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATION KEY ECONOMIC ISSUES SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT Areas where development might be possible Not an endorsement of new development

62. PLANNING AREA CATEGORIES Key Sites Residential Areas Mixed-Use Areas Town Centers/Downtowns Employment Areas/Institutions Rail Stations/Major Transfer Facility Areas Corridors CONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATION KEY ECONOMIC ISSUES SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT

63. PLACE TYPES MENU CONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATION KEY ECONOMIC ISSUES SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT

64. PLACE TYPE MANUAL CONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATION KEY ECONOMIC ISSUES SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT

65. PLACE TYPES Varying mixes of residential and employment uses: CONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATION KEY ECONOMIC ISSUES SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT Residential Mixed-Use Town Center/Downtown Employment Center/Institution

66. Cupertino City Center CupertinoRESIDENTIAL SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT

67. San JoseRESIDENTIALCONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATION KEY ECONOMIC ISSUES SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT

68. Park Place South Mountain ViewMIXED-USECONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATION KEY ECONOMIC ISSUES SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT

69. The Collonade San Jose MIXED USE SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT

70. TOWN CENTER / DOWNTOWN Downtow n San Jose CONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATION KEY ECONOMIC ISSUES SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT

71. TOWN CENTER / DOWNTOWN Downtown Mountain View CONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATION KEY ECONOMIC ISSUES SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT

72. EMPLOYMENT CENTER / INSTITUTION SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT Metro Plaza San Jose

73. EMPLOYMENT CENTER / INSTITUTION Dixon Landing North II Milpitas CONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATION KEY ECONOMIC ISSUES SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT

74. Varying land uses and densities within each Place Type Specify percentage of planning area to be changed Focus on the next 20 years PLACE TYPE CHARACTERISTICS CONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATION KEY ECONOMIC ISSUES SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT

75. OTHER PLANNING AREA ASSIGNMENTS No Change (includes open space) New Place Type Percent Increase CONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATION KEY ECONOMIC ISSUES SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT

76. Broad brush, regional perspective County-wide interactionAPPROACHCONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATION KEY ECONOMIC ISSUES SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT

77. PLACE TYPE EXERCISE CONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATION KEY ECONOMIC ISSUES SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT

78. PLACE TYPE EXERCISE CONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATION KEY ECONOMIC ISSUES SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT

79. PLACE TYPE EXERCISE CONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATION KEY ECONOMIC ISSUES SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT

80. PLACE TYPE EXERCISE CONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATION KEY ECONOMIC ISSUES SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT

81. PLACE TYPE EXERCISE CONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATION KEY ECONOMIC ISSUES SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT

82. PLACE TYPE EXERCISE CONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATION KEY ECONOMIC ISSUES SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT

83. AFFORDABLE HOUSING MIX Assign affordability mix to each planning area: CategoryDefault Very Low Income20% Low Income 9% Moderate Income27% Above Moderate Income44% CONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATION KEY ECONOMIC ISSUES SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT

84. Fiscal Reform Monetary Incentives to Local Governments Regulatory Exemptions Transportation Improvements and Policies Monetary Incentives for Individuals REGULATORY CHANGES AND INCENTIVES CONCLUSIONIMPLEMENTATION KEY ECONOMIC ISSUES SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT

85. Regional Agencies Smart Growth Strategy Bay Area Alliance for Sustainable Development Regional Livability Footprint Project Santa Clara County October 13, 2001 SMART GROWTH STRATEGY / REGIONAL LIVABILITY FOOTPRINT PROJECT