Download presentation
Published byAlban Evans Modified over 9 years ago
1
Aeroelastic Stability and Control of Large Wind Turbines
STABCON
2
STABCON: Aero-Servo-Elasticity of wind turbines
Part 2 Part 1
3
PRVS and ASR turbines: NM80 prototype in Tjæreborg
4
Investigated topics for passive instability suppression
Effect of airfoil aerodynamics Smooth stall characteristics increases the damping Effect of flapwise – edgewise frequency coincidence Coincidence creates a flapwise – edgewise whirling coupling Effect of flapwise – edgewise whirling coupling Coupled whirling modes ”share” aeroelastic damping Effect of torsional blade stiffness Low torsional blade stiffness may lead to flutter Can whirl flutter happen on a wind turbine? Yes for extremely low tilt/yaw stiffness of nacelle support Edgewise/torsion coupling for large flapwise deflections Downwind flapwise bending may increase edgewise damping Effect of yaw error on damping from wake The destabilizing effect of dynamic inflow changes slightly by yaw errors Effect of generator dynamics Damping effects depend on generator type and control strategy
5
Effect of edgewise/flapwise whirling coupling – PRVS
6
Effect of edgewise/flapwise whirling coupling – ASR
7
Effect of large flapwise deflection – PRVS
downwind pre-bend upwind pre-bend
8
Effect of large flapwise deflection – ASR
downwind pre-bend upwind pre-bend
9
Investigated topics for integrated aeroelastic control
Power/speed controller issues Speed controller frequency placed away from aeroelatic frequencies Active drivetrain damping by feedback to generator torque Drivetrain loads reduced by up to 10 % Active drivetrain damping reduces pitch activity Active tower damping by feedback to collective pitch Efficiency depend on the aeroelastic damping of the tower modes Cyclic pitch for flapwise blade and tilt/yaw load reductions Efficiency depend on the ratio of stochastic and deterministic loading most relative efficiency for low turbulence Too high feedback gains may lead to whirl-flutter-like instability Are there conflicting objectives of combined controllers? No, if there is a sufficient frequency separation of control actions
10
Cyclic pitch actions reduce flapwise blade loads
11
Cyclic pitch actions reduce tilt/yaw shaft and tower loads
12
Cyclic pitch actions affect the damping of tower modes
13
Active tower damping and cyclic pitch can be combined
14
Guidelines available from www.risoe.dk
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.