1. TPSS Leader & Teacher SLTs 2013-2014 School Year

2. ComponentEvaluation for TeachersEvaluation for School Leaders Setting GoalsTeachers set two SLTs in collaboration with evaluator Leaders set two SLTs in collaboration with evaluator Focusing on PracticeUses NIET / TAP Rubric to help prioritize instructional activities that will increase student outcomes and identify teacher strengths and areas for development Uses three domains that help prioritize leadership activities that will increase student outcomes and identify leaders strengths and areas for development Formal Feedback CyclesMinimum two observationsMinimum two site visits Evaluation MeasuresWeighted 50% Professional Practice and 50% Student Outcomes Final EvaluationsBased on five-point scale to be entered into CODE (converted to four point scale) Based on four-point scale to be entered into HCIS The Teacher and Leader Evaluations work together to increase educator effectiveness and student outcomes.

3. Goals for school leaders should set a vision for what students should be able to accomplish by the year’s end. Goals for school leaders should: Tie into your district-wide goals Drive a leader’s daily work Align to teachers’ goals Help students be college and career ready

4. District Goals Based on 8 Critical Goals

7. Leader SLTs Grades 3 – 8 schools: – One must be based on percentage from chart of all tested grades and subjects. Example: On the Spring 2014 Leap and iLeap tests, 70% (210 of 300)the students will score proficient or above. – One must be based on moving at least 30%(60 of 200) students who score unsatisfactory or approaching basic up one level. Example: On the Spring 2014 Leap and iLeap tests, 30% of the students that scored unsatisfactory or approaching basic on the previous year’s test will score one level higher.

8. Leader SLTs Grades 9 - 12 schools (examples for C school): – One must be based on percentage from chart of all EOC tested subjects. Example: On the Spring 2014 EOC tests, 64% of the students will score good or excellent. – One must be based on having a certain percentage of Juniors score 18 or higher on the March 2014 ACT assessment. Example: On the March 2014 state-wide administration of the ACT test, 50% of the Juniors taking the test will score 18 or higher.

9. Leader SLTs Grades K-2 schools (examples for C school): – One must be based on percentage from chart of all Dibels tested grades at the school. Example: On the End of the Year Dibels Next assessment, 64% of the students will be at benchmark. – For schools with a 2 nd grade, one must be based on the DBT: Example: On the End of Year District Benchmark mathematics test in 2 nd grade, the school average will be 80%. – For schools without a 2 nd grade, leaders can choose to do a math goal using Aimsweb or another Dibels goal focusing on lowering the number of students intensive to below 10%. Example: On the End of Year Aimsweb math assessment, 80% of the students will score proficient.

10. School Leaders will set their Student Learning Target Goals using the State Averages for Schools in their Category or District Guidance when available. See charts on upcoming slides.

12. Average Percentage of Students Scoring Basic or Above on LEAP/iLEAP (2010-11) A Schools3rd4th5th6th7th8th ELA9810099100 Math98100979910099 Science97 10098 Social Studies9698999899100 Totals9799989910099 B Schools3rd4th5th6th7th8th ELA86938788 86 Math88928789 84 Science868885868483 Social Studies818986 8588 Totals85918687 85 C Schools3rd4th5th6th7th8th ELA778678807981 Math828479827977 Science787976787576 Social Studies747978797680 Totals788278807779 D Schools3rd4th5th6th7th8th ELA65736664 63 Math68706567 59 Science61605559 55 Social Studies606360596264 Totals646762 6360 F Schools3rd4th5th6th7th8th ELA4950 494541 Math5152 554941 Science464134383928 Social Studies434450434439 Totals47 464437

13. Average EOC Proficiency (Good or Excellent) Rates (11-12) (English III and US History are estimates based on recent district performance) A SchoolsAlgebra IGeometryEnglish IIBiologyEnglish III US History Average of all 1009698967570 89 B SchoolsAlgebra IGeometryEnglish IIBiologyEnglish III US History Average of all 806682716560 71 C SchoolsAlgebra IGeometryEnglish IIBiologyEnglish III US History Average of All 705873625550 61 D SchoolsAlgebra IGeometryEnglish IIBiologyEnglish III US History Average of All 60456345 40 50 F SchoolsAlgebra IGeometryEnglish IIBiologyEnglish III US History Average of All 282541253530 31 District GoalA SchoolsB SchoolsC SchoolsD SchoolsF Schools 507060504030

14. Dibels Next Goals % Benchmark on the EOY Dibels Test A Schools K90% 1st80% 2nd80% B Schools K80% 1st70% 2nd70% C Schools K70% 1st60% 2nd60% D or F Schools K60% 1st50% 2nd50% F Schools K50% 1st40% 2nd40%

15. Scale for other non-tested grades and subjects D or F schools: average of 70% C schools: average of 80% B schools: average of 90% A schools: average of 100% *based on the fact that A schools are expected to have 100% of their students proficient.

16. Formula for Achievement Ranges with 70% as the Goal Insufficient Attainment is any result below Partial Attainment. (1 point) Below 54% Partial Attainment is a range from 15% below the target to just below the actual SLT. (2 points) 54%-69% START HERE: Full Attainment is a range from the actual SLT up to 15% above the target. (3 points) 70% - 85% Exceptional Attainment is any result above the Full Attainment range. This range should represent more than a year’s worth of growth. (4 points) Above 85%

17. Example Scoring Range with 77% as the goal. 61% or less of students will score Basic or above 62% - 76% of students will score Basic or above 77% - 92% of students will score Basic or above 93% or more of students will score Basic or above -15% from goal+15% from goal

18. SLT Writing Process for Teachers Step 1: The school leader sets goals and provides guidance to teachers regarding assessments and goals to use. Goals must be set using Tier 1 assessments when available and/or using the same assessments that the leader used to set their goals. When Tier 1 assessments are not available or the leader goals do not include the content of the course (i.e. physical education), goals must be set using the most rigorous and reliable assessments available. A teacher made test should not be used as the posttest when other assessments are available (see assessment chart). When possible, one goal should be for all of the students a teacher teachers and the other goal should focus on moving lower performing students to proficient.

19. Student Learning Targets Due Dates September 13: Directors, Supervisors, and Coordinators September 30: Principal Deadline October 31: Teacher Deadline

20. Resources District SLT website (C&I Webpage): http://www.tangischools.org//site/Default.aspx?PageID=17531