Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Improving Problem Solving In Small Group Settings With Scored Concept Mapping John Pelley, PhD, Texas Tech and Marti Echols, PhD, Nova.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Improving Problem Solving In Small Group Settings With Scored Concept Mapping John Pelley, PhD, Texas Tech and Marti Echols, PhD, Nova."— Presentation transcript:

1 Improving Problem Solving In Small Group Settings With Scored Concept Mapping John Pelley, PhD, Texas Tech and Marti Echols, PhD, Nova

2 Overview Why? – Why not leave the students to their own way of preparing? – Why is it important to focus on preparation? How? – How does concept mapping correct for differences in learning style? – How does concept mapping change reading behavior?

3 The Problem Assumption that students know how to prepare for problem solving exercises. – TBL and other problem solving discussion settings require knowledge of fundamentals. – Students do not read and understand learning objectives the same way. – Students debate and defend answer choices based on what they understand.

4 The Principle “The test drives the behavior.” – Students do not study to understand, they study to perform. – Goal is to require understanding in order to perform. – Consider both the role of faculty written exams and board/licensing exams

5 Experiential Learning Model 5 What is it? Outside Inside Can it be used? Experience new information What does it mean?

6 The Learning Cycle 6 Zull, 2002, The Art of Changing the Brain

7 Can You Find The Sittin’ And Readin’ Dendritic Tree? 7  Control left, LTP sensitized right  Tree of long-term potentiated cells markedly increased (hippocampus “rehearsal”).  Dendritic trees = “processing power.” Sittin’ and readin’ Complete learning cycle; plus 7.5hrs sleep (minimum)

8 Back To The Future Temporal (back) processing looks at – Facts, grouping, memorized patterns – From lectures, books, other resources Frontal (future) processing looks at – “Discovered” patterns, inferences, evaluation of options – From dialog during TBL/PBL 8

9 What’s Your Favorite Lobe? What information do you give the most attention to?  Specifics, routine procedure  The big picture, relationships, predictions  Everyone does both, but only one is preferred. 9

10 What’s Your Favorite Lobe? What information do you give the most attention to? Sensing types (MBTI)  Specifics, routine procedure  Temporal lobes emphasized Intuitive types (MBTI)  The big picture, relationships, predictions  Pre-frontal lobes emphasized 10

11 How Do Students Learn Differently? Focus on Myers-Briggs Sensing and Intuitive types Type preferences only indicate a comfort zone for learning Type is not a limitation Both ways of learning can be developed

12 Adapting Learning Based Upon MBTI Sensing types note every detail and see how details relate to each other Intuitives can develop this skill Intuitives look at the structure and hypothesize about outcome if the structure changed Sensing types can develop this skill

13 Test Taking Style S style – Seek answer that matches memorized knowledge – Re-read question to stimulate recall – Memorization learning requires recognition N style – Rule out answer choices – Don’t fit pattern – Big picture learning establishes patterns 13

14 Concept Maps Background on Concept Maps Developed from the work of cognitive psychologist, David Ausubel Believed “learning takes place by assimilating new concepts & propositions into the existing framework of the learner” Why “hands-on” learning is impt in science

15 Background (con’t) Very different from rote learning…must: – Be clear & use examples; must have prior knowledge and want to learn meaningfully Work in evaluation using concept maps is Novak (2000) and clinical interview (Edwards & Frase, 1983) Memory is not a vessel to be filled but a complex of interrelated memory systems

16 Benefits of a Concept Map Tie new information to old knowledge Think about relationships of facts and concepts Categorize ideas Clarify thoughts S & N both benefit Produces long-term memory (Novak, 1990)

17 Scoring a Concept Map Basics of higher order learning Link = 1 point; acquire facts, form node Branch Point = 5 points; Analysis & Application or discover and document, nodes with 2 or more links Cross Link = 10 points; between branches, converge common nodes, develop patterns Higher scoring parts of the map drive lower scoring Type A personality wants the highest points

18 Anatomy Of A Concept Map Key terms enclosed in “bubbles” Fact = two connected bubbles Connections can contain verbs – describes concept relationship Branch points represent groupings and organization Cross-links are comparisons and cause-and- effect integrative thinking 18

19 19 From SuccessTypes Prematriculation Program www.ttuhsc.edu/SOM/success

20 Top-Down vs. Center-Out Risk Factors For Breast Cancer 20

21 Top-Down vs. Center-Out Risk Factors For Breast Cancer 21 Main Idea

22 Using Concept Maps Concepts Maps “bridge the gap” Develop higher order thinking skills “S” learns how to categorize, relate “N” learns facts to support relationships “E” can think out loud “I” can prepare in advance for meaningful participation

23 How Does Concept Mapping Affect Learning Styles Sensing types can learn intuitive type skills – Discovery of patterns; relationships – Improved “ruling-out thinking” Intuitive types can learn sensing type skills – Recall of facts not in big picture – Improved time on task Helps change the brain for Ss and Ns

24 Steps to Constructing a Concept Map Faculty prepare key words from article or lecture Give to groups to review & determine how they relate Examine for relationships Draw arrows between words which relate Linking words above the arrows

25 Overview of Mapping List – Group – Compare 1. List important terms 2. Group by major topic 3. Compare by drawing cross-links 25

26 How to Concept Map 1.List or highlight the major concepts from notes or text. – Try a regular outline if more comfortable 2.Identify the most general concepts (grouping). 3.Arrange with most general concepts at the top – Label connecting lines to explain the relationship, if needed. – Arrowheads can show direction, cause-and-effect, etc. 26

27 How to Concept Map 4.Try to branch out at each level of the hierarchy with more than one link. – Reading becomes more normal now 5.Identify and draw cross-links between related concepts. – This is a powerful step in developing integrative thinking. 6.Alternative patterns: A “spider” or cluster pattern can be constructed from the center outward, but this will not be seen as readily by linear learners. 27

28 Scored Concept Mapping “The test drives the behavior” What can be scored? – Individual facts (any two nodes connected) – Levels of hierarchy (branch points) – Cross-links Scores can be weighted to emphasize integrative thinking.

29 Concept Mapping – Assessment Scoring system – What do we value? – Recall – individual facts 2 points per valid link – Analysis – grouping of related items 5 points per group (level of hierarchy) – Comparison – relationships between groups 10 points per cross-link

30 Exercise 1 Read handout passage for Exercise 1 (5 min) Make a list of all information that can be recalled. – This exercise resembles a typical student preparation for a TBL session. – Subsequently compared with construction of a concept map for the same reading assignment.

31 Exercise 1 Continued Brief clarification of directions for constructing a map Construct your own maps for the same reading assignment (10 min). Brief discussion period to explore initial reactions to reading vs. concept mapping.

32 Exercise 2 Read handout passage for Exercise 2 and construct a concept map (10 min) Exchange maps with a neighbor for scoring. When scoring has been completed neighbors discuss their maps and the scoring with each other (5-10 minutes)

33 Tally sheet: Use tick marks (////) to count Facts (links): Groups: Cross-links:

34 Discussion: Effect Of Scoring On Reading

35 May Our Cross Path Again As We Walk Through the Journey of Life Thanks for Spending Your Time Learning With Us Drs. John Pelley & Marti Echols


Download ppt "Improving Problem Solving In Small Group Settings With Scored Concept Mapping John Pelley, PhD, Texas Tech and Marti Echols, PhD, Nova."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google