Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byCorey Bryan Modified over 9 years ago
2
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL Who needs Disaster Recovery? 2 Just about 76% of you.
3
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL Why do you need Disaster Recovery? 3
4
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL Challenges: Disaster Recovery for a Virtual World Physical tools cannot deliver effective DR in a virtual environment Backup and archiving do not deliver DR 4
5
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL Don’t Force Fit a Hardware Tool in a Virtual Environment Requires manual coordination of physical and virtual environments Undermines the investment in virtualization –Storage, network, and server utilization is negatively impacted –Flexibility and mobility of VMs is lost BC/DR strategy and Virtualization strategy are not aligned 5
6
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL Backup is not Disaster Recovery either…. AttributeBackupDisaster Recovery Service Levels Application Impact Data Retention Reverse Replication X Automated Recovery X 6
7
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL Feature Summary 7 Hypervisor-based Virtual Aware For Private, Hybrid and Public Clouds Storage & Hypervisor Agnostic No Snapshots RPO = Seconds Continuous Data Protection Recover down to the second Click to Test, Click to Failover RTO = Minutes Offsite Backup Long Term Data Retention Always Recover Install in minutes No Downtime Simple Scalable Software Complete BC/DR Solution Enterprise-Class Disaster Recovery Software
8
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL Case Study: Woodforest National Bank Problem: Complex process leveraging array-based replication led to inefficient use of IT assets Solution: ZVR reduced complexity, simplified environment architecture Result: Reduced number of LUNs – 43% Reduced bandwidth requirements – 44% Reduced storage at target site – 25% Simple BC/DR process “Zerto enables us to be more efficient with storage…resulting in 30 percent savings.” Richard Ferrara, CIO, Woodforest National Bank To CIO Magazine, “At Houston Ban, Disaster Recovery Goes Virtual”
9
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL Problem: Paperless banking increased the BC/DR requirements; array-based replication did not meet the need Solution: Replicates efficiently – just VMs and VMDKs Replicates fast for very aggressive RPOs and RTOs Results: Storage footprint reduced by 43% RPO of seconds and RTO of minutes Simple BC/DR that did not disrupt their configuration 9 “…we knew it would improve our BC/DR process, but we got so much more. We reduced our storage footprint by more than 40%.” Bill Rausch, Software Engineering Manager “The service levels we are delivering to the business we never thought would be possible. It really helps me sleep at night.” Kevin Jackson, Senior Network Administrator Case Study: HAPO Credit Union
10
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL 10 Virtual Aware Enterprise-Class BC/DR Software Only Storage & Hypervisor Agnostic
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.