1. Rationale for scaling and root planing

2. Scaling
Root Planing
Process by which plaque and calculus are removed from both supra and subgingival tooth surface.
Process by which residual embedded calculus and portion of cementum are removed from the root to produce a smooth, hard and clean surface

3. Changes in root surfaces in periodontitis
Plaque and Calculus deposition.
Supra and subgingival calculus have a rough surface capable of harboring plaque that cannot be removed by conventional oral hygiene techniques.
Bauhammers et al,1973.

4. Changes in root surfaces in periodontitis
B. Alterations in exposed cementum
Hypermineralized surface zone
Changes in organic matrix
Endotoxins cytotoxic in tissue culture
Aleo et al , 1974

5. Primary objective Restoration of gingival health
Scaling and root planing are not separable procedures

6. Before Scaling & Root Planing
After Scaling & Root planing

7. Scaling and root planing are a prerequisite for the arrest and cure of periodontal disease; together with plaque control, they constitute the major means by which the disease is prevented.

8. Careful subgingival scaling and root planing is an effective mean to eliminate gingivitis and reduce the probing depth even at sites with initially deep periodontal pockets.
Badersten, 1984

9. Subgingival scaling and root planing are measures which can be effective in:
Eliminating inflammation
Reducing probing depths
Improving clinical attachment

10. Objectives Of Root Planing
Securing biologically acceptable root surfaces
Resolving inflammation
Decreasing pocket depth
Facilitating oral hygiene procedures
Improving or maintaining attachment level
Preparing the tissues for surgical procedures

11. Scaling and root planing is an integral part of periodontal therapy
Scaling and root planing is an integral part of periodontal therapy. The rationale for scaling and root planing is the following:
Removal of calculus and "infected" root structure
Achievement of a smooth root surface which is less prone to plaque accumulation

12. Rationale for root planing
Garret in 1977 set forth the rationale for root planing
Root Smoothness
Removal of Diseased Cementum
Preparation for New Attachment

13. Root Smoothness
No biological evidence which relates smooth root surfaces to decreased plaque formation or increased ease of removal.
It remains the only clinical indicator of calculus removal available at present.

14. Recent data suggests that root structure removal is not necessary
Recent data suggests that root structure removal is not necessary. The end point of scaling and root planing is however a smooth root surface as rough surfaces are more prone to plaque accumulation.
Calculus can be seen in radiographs or detected clinically.

15. Removal of Diseased Cementum
Removal of exposed cementum by root planing, the fibroblasts adhered to both diseased and non diseased areas of the root.
Aleo et al, 1975.

16. Deposits of calculus on root surfaces are frequently embedded in cemental irregularities ( Zander,1953; Moskow, 1969)
Scaling alone is therefore insufficient to remove calculus. A portion of cementum must be removed to eliminate these deposits.

17. Preparation for New Attachment
Root planing plays an important role in preparing root surfaces for demineralization and subsequent new attachment

18. To determine efficacy of therapy, therapeutic goals must first be established. In periodontal therapy, our objectives are as follows:
Suppression or elimination of pathogenic bacteria
Establishment of a healthy root surface
Conversion of inflamed to healthy tissues
Reduction of periodontal pockets

19. Scaling and root planing has both local and systemic sequelae.
Locally, the results of scaling and root planing are:
Debridement of bacteria and calculus
Removal of infected cementum and dentin
A shift in the microbial population

21. Scaling and root are not always the only measures that are required in order to properly eliminate subgingival infection in deep pockets.
Waerhaug(1978)
If, following scaling and root planing, signs of “bleeding” on probing to the bottom of the pocket” persist, and if the clinical attachment level fails to improve, surgical therapy should be considered since this treatment may facilitate more adequate root debridment .
Caffesee etal (1986)

22. The microbial shift is effected by two mechanisms
The removal of bacteria by scaling and root planing
The clinical outcome of scaling and root planing which alters the environment favoring population by certain bacteria over others
Decreased pocket depth
Smooth root surfaces
Reduction of inflammation

23. Scaling and root planing also has systemic effects
Scaling and root planing also has systemic effects. These are a bacteremia and a host immune response

24. Incidence of Bacteremia During Different Dental
Procedures Heimdahl, et al., 1990
Surgical Procedure
% of Patients with Bacteremia
%Viridans group streptococci
% Anaerobes
Dental Extraction
100 85 75
Scaling and Root Planing 70 55 65
Third Molar Surgery 40 45
Endodontic Treatment 20 15 5
Bilateral Tonsillectomy

25. Based on this study it can be seen that immediately after undergoing scaling and root planing the majority of patients (70%) will have a bacteremia.
The same study also showed that ten minutes after the procedure, the incidence of bacteremia is down to 30%.
This indicates that the host immune response is effective in eliminating the bacteria from the bloodstream, resulting in the rapid decline in the recovery of bacteria. For this reason, it is referred to as a transient bacteremia.

27. The Efficacy of Scaling and Root Planing
A study published in 1987, by Buchanan and Robertson, examined teeth (treatment planned for extraction) that were scaled and root planed for minutes each, subsequently extracted and examined microscopically for residual calculus. Results were recorded as percentages of calculus positive teeth (CPT) and calculus positive surfaces (CPS). These were compared to similarly examined teeth that received no treatment prior to extraction.

28. The Efficacy of Scaling and Root Planing
Effect of Scaling and Root Planing on Calculus Removal Buchanan and Robertson, 1987
Treatment
Probing Depth (mm)
% CPT
% CPS
None
6.0 ± 2.6
100 82
S/RP
5.7 ± 2.4 62 24
Even on treated teeth, a fairly high percentage of calculus was remained after scaling and root planing.

29. When comparing calculus removal by tooth type, tooth surface and probing depth, the results were fairly in keeping with logic .

30. The Efficacy of Scaling and Root Planing
% Calculus Positive Surfaces After S/RP by Tooth Type Buchanan and Robertson, 1987
Treatment
Anterior Teeth
Premolars
Molars
None 87 75 83
S/RP 19 29 26

31. The Efficacy of Scaling and Root Planing
% Calculus Positive Surfaces After S/RP by Tooth Surface Buchanan and Robertson, 1987
Treatment
Mesial
Distal
Facial
Lingual
None 91 96 64 77
S/RP 28 41 17 10

32. The Efficacy of Scaling and Root Planing
% Calculus Positive Surfaces by Probing Depth Buchanan and Robertson, 1987
Treatment
0-2
2.1-4
4.1-6
6.1-8
>8
None 67 69 84 90 88
S/RP 2 14 24 36 45

33. These data indicate that generally calculus is harder to remove in the posterior teeth as compared to anterior teeth, or with proximal surfaces as compared to facial or lingual/palatal surfaces, and in deeper pockets as compared to more shallow pockets.
An interesting point is that calculus removal by scaling and root planing was more efficient in the molar region than in the premolar region, but only slightly so.

34. The endpoint of clinical therapy is the elimination of inflammation
The endpoint of clinical therapy is the elimination of inflammation. To achieve this, open debridement may be required in addition to scaling and root planing, and treatment may be aided by chemotherapeutic agents.