1.  sfo/SAFIR maY 2011 P. Vo Tan, ParisN. Jabbur, Beyrouth S. Zaluski, Perpignan P. Rozot, Marseille J. Blondel, Nice G. Grabner, Salzbourg M.H Duret, LilleD. O’Brart, Londres

2. 1-month post-op  20 patients with bilateral cataract  Mean age 71. 8 years (44-87)  Pre-Op astigmatism ≤ 1 dpt  Incision size 2.2/2.4 mm  IOL power= 21.1 ±1.4 dpt  Multifocal, Monobloc, Hydrophilic Acrylic  Diffractive aspheric anterior surface  Addition of +3.5 D (IOL plane) SE Post-Op

3. 1-month post-op

5.  Do you wear correcting glasses?  Are you satisfied with your vision? Youngest patient (44 years)

6. Ongoing study M.H Duret, Lille Diff Add (HumanOptics) +3,5 0 D (n=9) AT LISA (Zeiss) Add +3,75 D (n=12) Micro F (Physiol) Add +3,50 et +1,75 D (n=5)

7. Mono (Aspira, n=30) Roessler, Küchle WOC 2010 MH Duret

8.  The new multifocal Diffractiva-aA provides excellent visual acuity at near and far distances as well as good intermediate distance results  The Diffractiva-aA is able to provide a high rate of spectacle independence and minimal photic phenomena at night  The excellent visual performance of the Diffractiva-aA is reflected by the high level of patients’ satisfaction

9.  The defocus curves show that, as expected, the trifocal micro F (Physiol) provides better intermediate vision than the two bifocal IOLs but the Diffractiva-aA outperforms the AT- LISA (Zeiss).  The contrast sensitivity curves show that the Diffractiva-aA outperforms the other MIOLs when patients are tested under mesopic conditions and there is no loss of contrast sensitivity when compared to its monofocal counterpart (Aspira)