1. © IPC, 20131 CDGCHRONO KEF Phase 1Phase 3Phase 4Phase 2 Impl level 2 Impl level 1 Impl level 4 Impl level 3 Impl level 5 BRU AMS CPH OSL HEL ARN MAD LIS FRA ATH Other: MRD- Implementation phasing BUD **Please click on each cell for more detailed information about the implementation level and its different phases** LIN VIECDG MXP LAX SFO

2. © IPC, 20132 Implementation level 1 < 50% handler registration < 80% MRD label recording by Post Simultaneous processing mostly on several workstations Good quality for delivery time at unit/flight level, 0% receptacle level. <50% unit delivery registration 0-10% receptacle level Operations Expected quality/quantity of data Phase 1 Partial MRD registration by handlers Not 100% handlers use the MRD No scan of MRD label by Post, or No possible link of MRD label with receptacle id’s in Postal system IPC CAN reliably report:  Date time stamp of delivery at unit/flight level (mainly to airlines) IPC CANNOT report:  POD data in CAPE to sending posts at receptacle level Back to grid

3. © IPC, 20133 Implementation level 1 Operations Expected quality/quantity of data Phase 2 ~ 50%-80% handler registration ~ 80-98% MRD label recording by Post Mostly batch processing Simultaneous processing on several workstations at times Good quality of data for delivery time Not reliable receptacle level information Quantity: 50-80% unit delivery information 10-60% receptacles delivered Partial MRD registration by handlers Not 100% handlers use the MRD No scan of MRD label by Post, or No possible link of MRD label with receptacle id’s in Postal system IPC CAN reliably report:  Date time stamp of delivery at unit/flight level (mainly to airlines) IPC CANNOT report:  POD data in CAPE to sending posts at receptacle level Back to grid

4. © IPC, 20134 Implementation level 1 Partial MRD registration by handlers Not 100% handlers use the MRD No scan of MRD label by Post, or No possible link of MRD label with receptacle id’s in Postal system IPC CAN reliably report:  Date time stamp of delivery at unit/flight level (mainly to airlines) IPC CANNOT report:  POD data in CAPE to sending posts at receptacle level Operations Expected quality/quantity of data Phase 3 ~ 80%-98% handler registration ~ 80-98% MRD label recording by Post Production mode based data transmission Good quality for delivery time at unit/flight level 100% reliable receptacle level data Quantity: 80-98% delivery registration 65-95%receptacle level Back to grid

5. © IPC, 20135 Implementation level 2 < 50% handler registration < 80% MRD label recording by Post Simultaneous processing mostly on several workstations Good quality for delivery time at unit/flight level, 0% receptacle level. <50% unit delivery registration 0-10% receptacle level Operations Expected quality/quantity of data Phase 1 Partial MRD registration by handlers Not 100% handlers use the MRD Post scans MRD labels Post sends RESCON from MRD label scan to IPC Post does not comply with Production Mode (Start/end scan+Workstation ID+XML file sharing) IPC CAN reliably report:  Date time stamp of delivery at unit/flight level (mainly to airlines) IPC CAN partially report:  POD data receptacle level only when IPC data checks ok IPC CANNOT report:  POD data in CAPE to sending posts and carriers receptacle level Back to grid

6. © IPC, 20136 Implementation level 2 Partial MRD registration by handlers Not 100% handlers use the MRD Post scans MRD labels Post sends RESCON from MRD label scan to IPC Post does not comply with Production Mode (Start/end scan+Workstation ID+XML file sharing) IPC CAN reliably report:  Date time stamp of delivery at unit/flight level (mainly to airlines) IPC CAN partially report:  POD data receptacle level only when IPC data checks ok IPC CANNOT report:  POD data in CAPE to sending posts and carriers receptacle level Operations Expected quality/quantity of data Phase 2 ~ 50%-80% handler registration ~ 80-98% MRD label recording by Post Mostly batch processing Simultaneous processing on several workstations at times Good quality of data for delivery time Not reliable receptacle level information Quantity: 50-80% unit delivery information 10-60% receptacles delivered Back to grid

7. © IPC, 20137 Implementation level 2 Partial MRD registration by handlers Not 100% handlers use the MRD Post scans MRD labels Post sends RESCON from MRD label scan to IPC Post does not comply with Production Mode (Start/end scan+Workstation ID+XML file sharing) IPC CAN reliably report:  Date time stamp of delivery at unit/flight level (mainly to airlines) IPC CAN partially report:  POD data receptacle level only when IPC data checks ok IPC CANNOT report:  POD data in CAPE to sending posts and carriers receptacle level Operations Expected quality/quantity of data Phase 3 ~ 80%-98% handler registration ~ 80-98% MRD label recording by Post Production mode based data transmission Good quality for delivery time at unit/flight level 100% reliable receptacle level data Quantity: 80-98% delivery registration 65-95%receptacle level Back to grid

8. © IPC, 20138 Implementation level 3 < 50% handler registration < 80% MRD label recording by Post Simultaneous processing mostly on several workstations Good quality for delivery time at unit/flight level, 0% receptacle level. <50% unit delivery registration 0-10% receptacle level Operations Expected quality/quantity of data Phase 1 Full MRD registration by 100% of handlers Post scans MRD labels Post sends RESCON from MRD label scan to IPC Post does not comply with Production Mode (Start/end scan+Workstation ID+XML file sharing) IPC CAN reliably report:  Date time stamp of delivery at unit/flight level (mainly to airlines) IPC CAN partially report:  POD data receptacle level only when IPC data checks ok  POD data in CAPE to sending posts and carriers receptacle level Back to grid

9. © IPC, 20139 Implementation level 3 Full MRD registration by 100% of handlers Post scans MRD labels Post sends RESCON from MRD label scan to IPC Post does not comply with Production Mode (Start/end scan+Workstation ID+XML file sharing) IPC CAN reliably report:  Date time stamp of delivery at unit/flight level (mainly to airlines) IPC CAN partially report:  POD data receptacle level only when IPC data checks ok  POD data in CAPE to sending posts and carriers receptacle level Operations Expected quality/quantity of data ~ 50%-80% handler registration ~ 80-98% MRD label recording by Post Mostly batch processing Simultaneous processing on several workstations at times Good quality of data for delivery time Not reliable receptacle level information Quantity: 50-80% unit delivery information 10-60% receptacles delivered Phase 2 Back to grid

10. © IPC, 201310 Implementation level 3 Full MRD registration by 100% of handlers Post scans MRD labels Post sends RESCON from MRD label scan to IPC Post does not comply with Production Mode (Start/end scan+Workstation ID+XML file sharing) IPC CAN reliably report:  Date time stamp of delivery at unit/flight level (mainly to airlines) IPC CAN partially report:  POD data receptacle level only when IPC data checks ok  POD data in CAPE to sending posts and carriers receptacle level Operations Expected quality/quantity of data Phase 3 ~ 80%-98% handler registration ~ 80-98% MRD label recording by Post Production mode based data transmission Good quality for delivery time at unit/flight level 100% reliable receptacle level data Quantity: 80-98% delivery registration 65-95%receptacle level Back to grid

11. © IPC, 201311 Implementation level 4 < 50% handler registration < 80% MRD label recording by Post Simultaneous processing mostly on several workstations Good quality for delivery time at unit/flight level, 0% receptacle level. <50% unit delivery registration 0-10% receptacle level Operations Expected quality/quantity of data Phase 1 Partial MRD registration by handlers Not 100% handlers use the MRD Post scans ALL MRD labels Post complies with Production Mode (Start/end scan+Workstation ID+XML file sharing) IPC CAN reliably report:  Date time stamp of delivery at unit/flight level (mainly to airlines)  Receptacle ID POD where receptacles are registered  Receptacle POD data in CAPE are 100% correct IPC CANNOT report:  POD data in CAPE to sending posts and carriers receptacle level where deliveries are not registered by handlers Back to grid

12. © IPC, 201312 Implementation level 4 Partial MRD registration by handlers Not 100% handlers use the MRD Post scans ALL MRD labels Post complies with Production Mode (Start/end scan+Workstation ID+XML file sharing) IPC CAN reliably report:  Date time stamp of delivery at unit/flight level (mainly to airlines)  Receptacle ID POD where receptacles are registered  Receptacle POD data in CAPE are 100% correct IPC CANNOT report:  POD data in CAPE to sending posts and carriers receptacle level where deliveries are not registered by handlers Operations Expected quality/quantity of data ~ 50%-80% handler registration ~ 80-98% MRD label recording by Post Mostly batch processing Simultaneous processing on several workstations at times Good quality of data for delivery time Not reliable receptacle level information Quantity: 50-80% unit delivery information 10-60% receptacles delivered Phase 2 Back to grid

13. © IPC, 201313 Implementation level 4 Partial MRD registration by handlers Not 100% handlers use the MRD Post scans ALL MRD labels Post complies with Production Mode (Start/end scan+Workstation ID+XML file sharing) IPC CAN reliably report:  Date time stamp of delivery at unit/flight level (mainly to airlines)  Receptacle ID POD where receptacles are registered  Receptacle POD data in CAPE are 100% correct IPC CANNOT report:  POD data in CAPE to sending posts and carriers receptacle level where deliveries are not registered by handlers Operations Expected quality/quantity of data Phase 3 ~ 80%-98% handler registration ~ 80-98% MRD label recording by Post Production mode based data transmission Good quality for delivery time at unit/flight level 100% reliable receptacle level data Quantity: 80-98% delivery registration 65-95%receptacle level Back to grid

14. © IPC, 201314 Implementation level 4 Partial MRD registration by handlers Not 100% handlers use the MRD Post scans ALL MRD labels Post complies with Production Mode (Start/end scan+Workstation ID+XML file sharing) IPC CAN reliably report:  Date time stamp of delivery at unit/flight level (mainly to airlines)  Receptacle ID POD where receptacles are registered  Receptacle POD data in CAPE are 100% correct IPC CANNOT report:  POD data in CAPE to sending posts and carriers receptacle level where deliveries are not registered by handlers Operations Expected quality/quantity of data Phase 4 ~ 100% handler registration ~100% MRD label recording by Post Production mode based data transmission ~ 100% quality at unit and receptacle level Quantity: ~ 100% unit and receptacle level data Back to grid

15. © IPC, 201315 Implementation level 5 100% MRD use by handlers Post scans ALL MRD labels Post complies with Production Mode (Start/end scan+Workstation ID+XML file sharing) IPC CAN reliably report:  Date time stamp of delivery at unit/flight level (mainly to airlines)  Receptacle POD data in CAPE are 100% correct  Full POD at receptacle level availability for posts and airlines IPC CANNOT report:  Potential missing registrations because of operational process failures Operations Expected quality/quantity of data Phase 3 ~ 80%-98% handler registration ~ 80-98% MRD label recording by Post Production mode based data transmission Good quality for delivery time at unit/flight level 100% reliable receptacle level data Quantity: 80-98% delivery registration 65-95%receptacle level Back to grid

16. © IPC, 201316 Implementation level 5 100% MRD use by handlers Post scans ALL MRD labels Post complies with Production Mode (Start/end scan+Workstation ID+XML file sharing) IPC CAN reliably report:  Date time stamp of delivery at unit/flight level (mainly to airlines)  Receptacle POD data in CAPE are 100% correct  Full POD at receptacle level availability for posts and airlines IPC CANNOT report:  Potential missing registrations because of operational process failures Operations Expected quality/quantity of data Phase 4 ~ 100% handler registration ~100% MRD label recording by Post Production mode based data transmission ~ 100% quality at unit and receptacle level Quantity: ~ 100% unit and receptacle level data Back to grid