1. Imaging Status Shivaun Albright Imaging Committee Chair Hewlett Packard

2. Agenda UPnP v1 Printing and Imaging Use Cases UPnP v1 Imaging Update – Where are we? UPnP v1 Deficiencies UPnP v2 Requirements UPnP v2 Use Scenarios Schedule for UPnP v2 Imaging Next Steps

3. End User Benefits oNo need to manually install or share printer on the network (no networking knowledge needed) oAutomatically discover printer/scanner and no need to search for new imaging devices added to the network. oAbility to print and scan from an extended range of devices (Pocket PCs, Cell Phones, Web Tablets) Discovery and Installation UPnP Network Plug Printer/Scanner directly into any available network port Imaging devices are discovered and can immediately be used (no drivers installation or setup ) New wireless devices enter network and have instant access to printer/scanner WiFi (802.11b)

4. Service-Enabled Imaging Services Photos captured and distributed Grandma’s TV Distributes through services

5. Print Subcommittee Status - UPnP v1 Printer Service Specifications Approved  Printer:1 Device  PrintBasic:1 Service Minimal Data Format – XHTML-Print  IEEE-ISTO PWG Proposed Standard document  XHTML-Print  Required Embedded Image Format  JPEG (JFIF) – PrintBasic Sample Implementers  HP, Oak Technologies, Canon, Microsoft Printer Specifications published as Approved Standards – July 2002

6. Scan Subcommittee Status – UPnP V1 Scanner Service Definitions Complete  Scanner Device  Scanner Service  ExternalActivity Service  Feeder Service Minimal Data Format – XHTML-Print  Required Image Format  JPEG (JFIF) Support Sample Implementers: Canon, Ricoh, HP Scanner Specifications published as Approved Standards – September 2002

7. UPnP Version 1 Deficiencies  Data types  Missing Arrays and complex structures  Action Extensibility  Need to be able to specify whether arguments are optional/required or whether it should just use device settings (defaults)  Service Inheritance  Data inheritance may work here  Eventing  SOAP-based eventing instead of GENA so that secured eventing could be supported  Event filtering and grouping at the device level

8. Imaging WC Architecture Requirements Utilize standard web services to develop a standard service for:  Eventing  Discovery - Scalability of discovery for enterprise support  Security Ability to extend Actions/Operations Simple way to designate “Default” values  Outside of the SCPD  Run-time parsing of the SCPD is too much of a burden

9. Use Scenarios (Printer) for v2 Location-based Printing – “print to the near-by printer” (hotel, home, airport, etc.)  Microsoft desktop printing for the mobile client  Driver-centric model using a PDL  PDA, cell phone (e.g., XHTML-Print) printing  Job Ticket Model + XHTML-Print  “Client operates the same—regardless of the location” Secure Printing

10. Use Scenarios (Scan) for v2 Scan  Scan to a service (e.g., storage, application)  Scan to a fax  Scan to e-mail  Scan to Print (copy function)  Scan with user intervention

11. UPnP v2 Imaging Schedule  Complete Use cases  Prioritize  Identify Requirements  Complete Device Model (MFD vs. Print & Scan)  Provide Architecture input  Complete Detailed service interfaces  Design Complete – tbd  Complete Prototypes  PlugFests (minimum of 2) – tbd  Possible Hosts: Lexmark, Oak Tech., MS, HP  Incorporate feedback from Plugfests  Technical review, forum review, SC review  “Approved” specification - tbd

12. Next Steps Forward progress required on the UPnP v2 architecture

13. For the interconnected lifestyle