Download presentation
Published byRose Beasley Modified over 9 years ago
1
Anatomy of a Manuscript How to write a manuscript in 19 sentences
David Bangsberg, MD, MPH Director Massachusetts General Center for Global Health Harvard Medical School Harvard Initiative for Global Health
2
Types of Manuscripts Full research report Brief report Research letter
3000 words 3-4 main/supporting points 3-4 tables figures Brief report 1800 words 1-2 main/supporting points 1-2 table/figure Research letter 800 words 1 point 0-1 table/figures
3
Types of Manuscripts Review Article Editorial Case report
4
Anatomy of a Manuscript
Title page Abstract Introduction Methods Results Tables/Figures Discussion Acknowledgements
5
Which to write first? Title page Abstract Introduction Methods Results
Tables/Figures Discussion Acknowledgements
6
Writing Order Introduction (brief literature review)
Ghost Tables/Figures (analytic plan) Methods Tables/Figures Results Discussion Abstract Title page Acknowledgements
7
Introduction Nature of problem and significance
Context within prior knowledge Specific research objectives and preplanned analyses, including subgroup analyses
8
Introduction 3 paragraphs
Paragraph #1: What we know Limit to only pertinent references Paragraph #2: What we don’t know. Paragraph #3: What we did to find out Primary and secondary research objectives Preplanned subgroup analyses
9
Figures/Table Aim for 3-4 total Table 1: Patient characteristics
Table 2-4: one each research objective
10
Tables Purpose Concise display of info Provide several levels of detail Reduces length of text Restrict table/figures to explain argument and assess report
11
Tables Double space on single page
Number consecutively in order of first citation in text Title should summarize data Do not use horizontal lines Give each column a brief/abbreviated heading Footnote explanatory matter Identify statistical measures of variation Double space legend on separate page
12
Figures Number consecutively according to order cited
High resolution images Letters numbers and symbols need to be clear and sufficient size Include titles and detailed explanations in legend rather than figure Double space legend on separate page
13
Methods Study design Subject selection Source population
Inclusion criteria Exclusion criteria Rationale for inclusion/exclusion criteria
14
Methods Technical information Variable definition and measurement
Reference well known procedures Briefly describe and reference less known procedures Describe in detail new procedures Provide rationale for procedure selection Apparatus: manufacturer name and city in parentheses
15
Methods Statistical/Analytic methods Human subjects approval
Provide enough detail for a knowledgeable reader with access to original data to verify results Specific analytic methods Software Approach to bias/confounding Human subjects approval
16
Methods 3-5 paragraphs Paragraph #1: participant selection
Paragraph #2-4: variables and procedures for each primary and secondary objective Last paragraph: analytic methods
17
Results Narrative should be same logical sequence as tables/figures
Summarize rather than repeat all data from tables in text Include absolute numbers with percentages
18
Results 3-4 paragraphs Paragraph #1 Paragraph #2 Paragraph #3
Patient recruitment Accept/decline Patient characteristics Paragraph #2 Evidence for first objective Paragraph #3 Evidence for second objective Paragraph #4 Evidence for third objective
19
Discussion Summarize new and important findings
Conclusions should follow objectives Suggest mechanism Suggest clinical implications Discuss limitations
20
Discussion 5 paragraphs
Summarize main finding Paragraph 2 Summarize supporting findings Paragraph 3 What are the implications How does it change practice? Paragraph 4 Limitations Paragraph 5 Summary/conclusion
21
References Cite primary work over review articles
Avoid abstracts when possible “in press” articles require permission Avoid personal communication unless it provides essential information not available from a public source – include person and date Check accuracy and formatting
22
Title Page Concise title that includes important info
Study design Research question/finding Makes electronic retrieval sensitive and specific Authors names and institutional affiliations Corresponding author: name, mailing address, fax, Sources of grant support Running head (<40 characters) Word count for text only Number of figures/tables
23
Abstract Content or background Study purpose Basic procedures
Selection of subjects Key variables Analytic methods Main findings including effect sizes/statistical significance Principal conclusions
24
Key Words 3-10 works that capture main topics for indexing
25
Abbreviations Only standard abbreviations
ARV or ART Use full term, then abbreviation in parentheses after first use
26
Acknowledgement Individuals who made essential contributions
Funding source
27
Cover letter Format of article Brief summary of finding
Statement of non-redundancy of submission of publication Conflict of interest Read and approved by all authors Contact info for corresponding author
28
Authorship Criteria Substantial contribution to
Conception and design, or Acquisition of data, or Analysis and interpretation Drafting and critical revision of manuscript for intellectual content Final approval of submitted version
29
Authorship Order First author Last author Second author Third author
Design/conceive the study Writes first draft Partners with last author for subsequent drafts Last author Usually experienced investigator who partners with first author in interpretation, analysis, and writing Second author Major contribution Third author Important contributions Middle authors Everyone else who qualifies for authorship
30
Corresponding Author Usually first or senior author Submits manuscript
Corresponds with publisher/editor Revision Gallies Receives subsequent correspondence from outside investigators
31
Conflict of Interest Financial or personal relationship that inappropriately influences author, reviewer or editor Employment consultancies, stock ownership, expert testimony Same institution, relative, mentor, student, academic adversary All potentially perceived rather than just actual conflicts should be disclosed
32
Redundant Publication
Substantial overlap with another manuscript in print or electronic media Preliminary reporting to media, government agencies or manufactures violates editorial policy of many journals Related work should be referred to and referenced Consider including copies of related material Does not apply to presentations at scientific conferences
33
Embargo Defined date of release of published information
Determined by publisher Creates level playing field amongst news agencies Minimizes chaos of economically charged findings
34
Submission Process 6-15 months
Approval of co-authors of final manuscript Submission of manuscript and cover letter Editorial review (2-3 weeks) Reject Send out for review 1st review (6-12 weeks) Reject and revise Conditionally accept Accept 2nd Review (2-8 weeks) Gallies (2-6 months) Publication (1-3 months)
35
Strategies For Success
2 uninterrupted hours per day Write intro/methods while collecting data Consider opinion/review paper while collecting data Prepare ghost tables to guide analysis Write topic sentence for each paragraph
36
Simple as 19 Sentences One topic sentence per paragraph
Introduction #1: What we know #2: What we don’t know. #3: What we did to find out Methods #4: participant selection #5-9: variables and procedures for each primary and secondary objective #10: analytic methods Results #11 Patient recruitment and characteristics #12 Evidence for first objective #13 Evidence for second objective #14 Evidence for third objective Discussion #15 Summarize main finding #16 Summarize supporting findings #17 What are the implications/how does it change practice? #18 Limitations #19 Summary/conclusion
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.