Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byRosamund Booth Modified over 9 years ago
1
Making friends with childhood anxiety: an early intervention Presenters: Ms Jemona Mostert Dr Helene Loxton Department of Psychology, Stellenbosch University
2
Introduction Motivation for the study Literature suggest a high prevalence of anxiety symptoms among South African youth (inter alia Burkhardt, Loxton, & Muris, 2003 ; Muris, Schmidt, Engelbrecht, & Perold, 2002 ) Yet, an early intervention- and prevention programme is lacking Aims of the study To investigate the effectiveness of a CBT early intervention- and prevention programme in a sample of middle childhood children
3
Method Research Design Quasi-experimental design: non-equivalent waitlist- comparison group Sampling ad hoc sample of 12-year-old (M=12.6, SD=9.12) children Participants 66 children (30 girls, 36 boys) from a local school at Stellenbosch, in in a formerly disadvantaged neighbourhood
4
Measures Spence Children’s Anxiety Scale (SCAS) (Spence, 1997) Revised Children’s Manifest Anxiety Scale (RCMAS) (Reynolds, & Richmond, 1978) Time Line Time 1: pre-intervention assessment Rx : Intervention group Time 2: post-intervention assessment Time 3: post-intervention follow-up Rx : Waitlist-comparison group Time 4: post-intervention assessment
5
Intervention Programme Motivation for FRIENDS programme research based (Barrett, & Turner, 2001) child-friendliness FRIENDS programme (Barrett, 2004) F =Feeling worried? R =Relax and feel good I =Inner thoughts E =Exploring plans N =Nice work – reward yourself! D =Don’t forget to practise S =Stay calm!
6
Results Between group effects (n=46) (oneway ANOVA) Time 1: SCAS: F(1,44) = 0.27 p = 1.00 RCMAS: F(1,44) = 0.55, p = 1.00 Time 2: SCAS: F(1,44) = 0.01, p = 1.00 RCMAS: F(1,44) = 0.83, p = 1.00 Time 3: SCAS: F(1,44) = 2.25, p =.56 RCMAS: F(1,44) = 1.42, p =.96 Time 4: SCAS: F(1,44) = 0.07, p = 1.00 RCMAS: F(1,44) = 0.23, p = 1.00
7
Within group effects (n=46) (repeated measures ANOVA) Significant effect for time within the intervention group: F(2.61) = 10.84, p =.00 Post Hoc: from Time 3 onward (4-months post- intervention) No significant effect for time within the waitlist- comparison group: F(1.87) = 1.36, p =.27
8
Implications Need for an early intervention and prevention programme CBT principles are appropriate for middle childhood children Australian FRIENDS program cost effectiveness? Options? collaboration and adaption of established programmes? own program, relevant to the South African context? alternatives?
9
References Barrett, P.M. (2004). FRIENDS for life: Group leaders’ manual. Bowen Hills, Australia: Australian Academic Press. Barrett, P.M., & Turner, C.M. (2001). Prevention of anxiety symptoms in primary school children: Preliminary results from a universal school-based trial. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 40, 399-410. Burkhardt, K., Loxton, H.S., & Muris, P. (2003). Fears and fearfulness in South-African children. Behaviour Change, 20(2), 94-102.
10
Muris, P., Schmidt, H., Engelbrecht, P., & Perold, M. (2002). DSM-IV defined anxiety disorder symptoms in South African children. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 41, 1360-1368. Reynolds, C.R., & Richmond, B.O. (1978). What I think and feel: A revised measure of children’s manifest anxiety. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 6, 271- 280. Spence, S.H. (1997). Structure of anxiety symptoms among children: A confirmatory factor analytic study. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 106(2), 280-297.
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.