1. Self evaluation Maurice Girvin

2. Self evaluation Navel gazing

3. Self evaluation Whole School Department Pupil Staff

4. Whole School – informing the S.D.P. Kirkland Rowell Survey Staff (55) Pupils (649) Parents (458) BOG & SMT Quality Assurance Examination Review Target Setting and Action Planning SOW Staff Self evaluation Committee Sharing good practice Quality Assurance of Departmental Materials used for Self-evaluation SMT Quality Assurance Book Review Pupil Planners SEN Routines Website Data Analysis Benchmark Data Baseline Data Department Teacher Student Value Added

5. Department BOG & SMT Quality Assurance Examination Review Target Setting and Action Planning SOW Review PRSD Focus for the last two years is on Self evaluation Department Development plan 3 year Departmental plan based upon the SDP Department Action Planning 1 year Action Plan showing the outworking of the Departmental Development plan and the PRSD process.

6. PRSD 2012 – 2013 Objectives 1 & 2: Self-evaluation process - report Feedback for Improvement 2013 – 2014 Objectives 1 & 2: Self-evaluation process - report Differentiation in the Classroom

7. Self-evaluation process ‘Self-evaluation’ => Departmental ‘self-evaluation’ => Reflective practice at Departmental level. ---------------------------------------------------------------- ‘Feedback for Improvement’

8. Self-evaluation Process: ‘Feedback for Improvement’ What is first hand evidence? 1.Pupils’ Books 2.Lesson observation – “trusted colleague” 3.Questionnaires 4.Data. “Small steps properly managed can lead to large gains”

9. Obtaining the Evidence Pupils’ Books: Do the pupils’ books include feedback for improvement? Does the feedback within the pupils’ books aid understanding?

10. PRSD Lesson Observation: Does the lesson concentrate on ‘Feedback for improvement’ when appropriate? Are all pupils familiar with the concept of ‘feedback for improvement’ and use the feedback to improve their learning? What strengths emerge from the lesson when feedback for improvement is evident? What areas are there to develop within the lesson when using feedback for improvement?

11. PRSD - Use of Questionnaire Departmental Questions / Discussions: What do you understand by the term ‘feedback for improvement’? How often have you used ‘feedback for improvement’ within the classroom / homeworks etc? What benefits have ‘feedback for improvement’ brought to your work in this subject? Does ‘feedback for improvement’ always improve your work in this subject? If you could add any key points to the process of ‘feedback for improvement’ in this subject, what would they be?

12. PRSD - Close the loop PRSD Objective one: Self-Evaluative Report Informs the: Department Development Plan Department Action Planning

13. Staff self evaluation PRSD All Staff contribute to the Departmental Self Evaluation report Data All Staff have access to Data about their students, department and their classes that is Benchmarked Department Self-evaluation Documents Departmental Development Plan, Department Action Plan, Departmental Target Setting and Results Analysis

14. Pupil self evaluation Target Setting: All students set individual targets based upon baseline testing Action Plan: All students categorised as underachieving are given action plans set by subject teachers, HOY or a member of SMT Topic Self-evaluation: Students complete self- evaluation sheets at the end of each topic in most subjects Mock Results Day: All students complete a self evaluation sheet at their Mock results day