1. Another example of critical angle refraction noise.
No noise removal
With noise removal.

2. You saw the sonic log version
You saw the sonic log version. These are the input stacks – subtle but important differences. My goal here was to see how much I could improve, to better pick what I know are important faults.
No noise removal
With noise removal.

3. This show is part of a series that deals with improving seismic resolution through non-linear methods. In a sense the discipline of constructing the displays is, in itself, a development tool.
Before
After
My work always starts with gathers. Before and after noise removal pictures are shown for two depth points, on each slide. I show a number of these slides, inserting explanations as se go. If you stay with me I will discuss the noise origin in some detail, and point to specific examples (as above).
Before
After

4. You will notice the only usable energy is on the very inside traces
You will notice the only usable energy is on the very inside traces. I have looked at the entire 3D project and can assure you this is true through it all.
Before
After
I say the cause was the fact that early “critical angle crossovers” interrupted the downwave. Much of the noise you will see are refractions spawned from strong beds (where their reflection was terminated). This type of noise is very common (and completely ignored). It certainly brings out the AVO advocates, who follow their own path.
Before
After

5. Since refractions travel horizontally, difference in trace to trace position is a linear function of their velocity. Thus normal moveout over-corrects. My logic searches them out and then lifts them off.
Before
After
While there is a distinct improvement on the final results, the fact that it is not “day and night” is a tribute to the raw power of the stack (which is “looking through” the refraction noise). The importance of establishing the reality of this noise stands by itself however, since so many mistaken concepts (that it throws out) have gone on for years.
Before
After

6. Let me go back over the critical angle thing one more time.
Before
After
The angle at which all downward traveling energy is cut off depends on the reflection coefficient and the interface depth. Nature abhors a vacuum, so every time a strong reflection is abruptly interrupted it spews off a refraction. While noise can be hard for the human eye to spot, you will hopefully see a number of of noise cases where the refraction “hangs” on the reflection. The system catches most of them, but nothing is perfect.
Before
After

7. Of course refractions are not the only under-treated noise type.
Before
After
We also scan for under corrected events. The two types are inter-bed multiples and low velocity shear wave reflections If you watch closely you might see a couple of examples of those ignored noise types.
Before
After

8. In a logical world, this single slide should prove the point.
Here is a great example of refractions hanging on reflections.
Before
After
In a logical world, this single slide should prove the point.
Before
After

9. To track the boundary between refractions and real events
Before
After
Would require a sophisticated ray tracing study, as shown above.
Before
After

10. But for now I just add a few more example slides for emphasis.
Before
After
When finished with these I show a fault study on another in-line.
Before
After

11. 1.
However, since I have a lot to say, I’ll use the space to develop my main themes.
Before
After
In my extensive work with sonic log simulation (with it’s myriad of great well log matches) I have developed a faith in the validity of amplitude as a valid hydrocarbon indicator. Working in strike slip fault areas I found that abrupt amplitude changes on my simulations provide necessary clues for establishing believable fault patterns.
Before
After

12. 2.
But it soon became apparent that noise seriously compromised my results.
Before
After
In my earlier processing of this data, I saw the noise, but had not yet developed removal tools. I thought I could establish a fault pattern, but my results were not good enough for confidence. Since I firmly believe decent fault traps have been missed by others, improving the results became a means to the desired interpretation end.
Before
After

13. 3.
The heavy blurring effect of pre-stack migration has seriously hurt fault picking.
Before
After
As a result we are most dependent on seeing changes in character as fault evidence. The ability of my simulation logic to make sense of the set of primary reflections (that come from a bed) is key. In addition I am convinced that strike slip (parallel) faulting is omnipresent. The fact that no real vertical offsets are necessary is a big problem.
Before
After

14. 4.
So, on the next slide I show another in-line comparison for your study.
Before
After
I then repeat that comparison, to show how I pick one of the faults I see. In summary, the entire effort is oriented to this type of interpretation. It is my recurrent theme and avocation.
Before
After

15. No noise removal
With noise removal.

16. No noise removal
With noise removal.