1. Final Report

2. Dev/Prototype Fall 2011 System Testing (Early) Spring 2012 Pilot Test w/ Selected Departments Spring 2012 Trainings for Academic Chairs and ADA's August 15, 2012 September 19, 2012

3.  292 class sections (from various departments that participated: Econ, Math, Psych, Sociology, etc.)  5,016 students  9,710 evaluations were sent out and 6,855 were submitted by students (~71% response rate)

4.  Similar to the original format  Same scoring method (fractional median).  Reports are broken down by ◦ Instructor/class/section ◦ Ranked faculty aggregate ◦ IAS aggregate ◦ Department overall  PDF format ◦ Departments can choose to email or print

5.  An email will be sent to all enrolled students for each class.

6.  Once logged in, the student will see a summary of all classes awaiting evaluation.

7.  Students will receive the first email prompt at the start of the 13 th week for 14 week courses ◦ Class End Date is used when calculating SEI start/end dates for 7 week classes. ◦ Dynamic session class dates are set manually.  Two reminders will be sent.  The process will occur over 10 days.

9.  The standard set of six questions approved by Faculty Senate is fixed for all questionnaires.

10.  Additional “evaluation” templates can be created.  Department chairs can create a questionnaire that incorporates the standard questions + additional questions defined by the department.

12.  Adding a question to the repository  Supported question types: ◦ 5 point rating (Strongly Agree  Strongly Disagree) ◦ Open ended ◦ Multiple Choice

13.  The standard SEI will automatically be generated for each course.  Chairs will be able to assign a different questionnaire template ◦ If the department has additional questions they ask of each class ◦ If the department has a subsection of classes that receive a different questionnaire (e.g., lab courses)  Chairs may also remove the SEI from courses that should not be assessed (e.g. independent studies).

15.  ITS needs a documented guideline that will outline how often the SEI data should be purged from the university system  ITS will need to have an SEI user group possibly made up of ADAs and Department Chairs : ◦ Ongoing training and knowledge sharing ◦ Works with ITS to improve the SEI system, if needed