1. PRESENTED BY: MARNIE CHRISTINE CODY, ESQ. AND DONNA DESMOND, ASA Alternatives to Compensation in Billboard Removal

2. Eight – Sheets Poster Panels Billboards in the Way

3. Bulletins - Static Digitals Billboards in the Way

4. What’s the Problem? Billboards have significant value Value is locational dependant Local ordinances restrict relocation/replacement State restricts location of billboards Property owners may not approve

5. Controlling Authorities City or County  Issues building permit  Regulates placement or relocation of billboards within area of jurisdiction Caltrans  Outdoor Advertising Act controls placement and operations of all billboards within 660 ft. of and visible from state and federal controlled right of way and in many instances, billboards beyond 660 ft. that are or would be primarily visible from the right of way  Regulates size, placement, illumination, distance between billboards and proximity to commercial/industrial areas

6. Cal Bus. & Prof Code §5412 – The Bible of Relocation … “no advertising display which was lawfully erected anywhere within the state shall be compelled to be removed” …... “without payment of compensation, as defined in Eminent Domain Law” …... “The compensation shall be paid to the owner or owners of the advertising display and the owner or owners of the land upon which the display is located.”

7. Cal Bus. & Prof Code §5412 – The Bible of Relocation ‘Relocation,’ as used in this section, includes removal of a display and construction of a new display to substitute for the display removed. It is a policy of this state to encourage local entities and display owners to enter into relocation agreements which allow local entities to continue development in a planned manner without expenditure of public funds while allowing the continued maintenance of private investment and a medium of public communication. Cities, counties, … are specifically empowered to enter into relocation agreements on whatever terms are agreeable to the display owner and the city, county …

8. Alternatives to Compensation What are the parties goals?  Sign operator’s goal = preservation of asset & income  Agency’s goal = development in a planned manner without expenditure of public funds

9. Is it only an encroachment issue? Reaching the Parties’ Goals: It all starts with communication Can the sign’s removal be avoided? Is there any rush to clear the property?

10. Considerations When Sign is Compelled to be Removed Potential for Same-Site Relocation  Sign In-Kind  Sign Upgrade Alternative Site Relocation  What is a comparable site?  It is not “relocation” if the sign operator already could have constructed there.  Build new or modify existing signs & expand entitlements?

11. Case Study #1 Single 12’ x 24’ sign showing to Hwy 126 Condemned for redevelopment purposes ED filed and settled by negotiated agreement Sign owner has continued possession Parties in cooperation toward relocation, site selection & agency approvals Right to compensation secured in amount to be determined if possession is ended w/in 15 years with no relocation

12. Case Study #2 – A 7½ Year Odyssey 14 signs acquired through eminent domain for roadway construction All conventional static billboards of varying size showing to greatly traveled high demographic thoroughfare Valued at $14,000,000 Result: sign company relocated 4 billboards including 2 electronic displays adjacent major freeway on property owned by condemning agency

13. Case Study #2 – A 7½ Year Odyssey It takes a village:  Local Transportation Authority  City Council District  Mayor  Dept. of City Planning, Community Planning Bureau & Dev. Services  Public Work Bureau of Engineering  EIR Consultant  Community Redevelopment Agency  Bureau of Street Services  Department of Building & Safety  State Department of Transportation