Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byJustin Boone Modified over 9 years ago
1
CMOS Analog Integrated Circuits: Models, Analysis, & Design EE448 MOS Circuit Level Models Fall 2001 Dr. John Choma, Jr. Professor of Electrical Engineering University of Southern California Department of Electrical Engineering-Electrophysics University Park; Mail Code: 0271 Los Angeles, California 90089-0271 213-740-4692 [OFF] 626-915-7503 [HOME] 626-915-0944 [FAX] johnc@almaak.usc.edu (E-MAIL)
2
Lecture Overview 2 Static Model Cutoff Region Ohmic (Triode) Region Model Saturation Region Model Subthreshold Model Short Channel Effects In Saturation Channel Length Modulation Substrate/Bulk Phenomena Mobility Degradation Carrier Velocity Saturation Small Signal Model In Saturation Forward Transconductance Bulk Transconductance Capacitances Sample Circuit Analysis (Inverter) Gain Bandwidth
3
N–Channel MOSFET 3 I s =I d +I g +I b I g 0 I b 0, forV bs < 0 I s I d V ds =V gs –V gd Silicon Dioxide B L T ox SDG N+ Source N+ Drain L d L d W X d P–Type Substrate (Concentration = N D cm -3 ) I d D G S V ds B V bs V gs V gd I g I s I b
4
P–Channel MOSFET 4 I s =I d +I g +I b I g 0 I b 0, forV sb < 0 I s I d V sd =V sg –V dg D G S V sd B V sb V dg I g I s I b I d V sg Silicon Dioxide B L T ox SDG P+ Source P+ Drain L d L d W X d N–Type Substrate (Concentration = N D cm -3 )
5
Characteristic Curves: Cutoff And Ohmic Regimes l Cutoff Regime: Threshold Voltage, Function Of Bulk–Source Voltage l Ohmic Regime: (Hundreds Of µmhos/Volt) l Comments W/L Is Gate–Channel Aspect Ratio, A Designable Parameter Temperature Effects (Holes And Electrons): Resistance For Small Drain–Source Voltage: 5 V hn K n =µ n C ox = µ n T µ(T) µ(To)µ(To) T o T 3 / 2 V gs –V hn –V ds V gs –V hn – V ds 2 V gs V hn and V ds <V gs –V hn I d V ds 1 R =K n W L V gs –V hn –V ds = I d V I d V
6
Characteristic Curves: Saturated Regime l Saturation Regime: l Comments Square Law Voltage–Controlled Current Source Drain Current Shows Negative Temperature Coefficient Because Of Its Proportionality To Mobility Differential Current Of Two Matched Devices Is Linear With Differential Gate–Source Voltage, Provided Common Mode Gate–Source Voltage Is A Constant 6 V gs V hn &V ds V gs –V hn V dss V gs –V hn Drain Saturation Voltage I dss = K n 2 W L V 2 Drain Saturation Current
7
Simple Differential Pair 6a l Inputs l Response l Note Differential Output Current And Voltage Are Linear With Respect To Differential Input Voltage Without Invoking Small Signal Approximation
8
Characteristic Curves: Subthreshold Regime 7 l Subthreshold Regime: s l Comments s Bipolar Type I–V Action Indigenous To Subthreshold Regime s Subthreshold Operation Corresponds To Gate–Channel Interface Potentials Lying Between One And Two Fermi Potentials s Useful Only For Low Speed, Low Power Applications I d =2 K n W L n V T 2 e (V gs –V hn ) / n V T
9
Sample Simplified MOS Static Characteristics 8
10
l Depletion l Zero Current l l Voltage Across Oxide l Interface Potential V ds P–Type Substrate DEPLETION LAYER, V 0 ds SiO 2 I d SD G c V gs N+ Drain N+ Source DEPLETION LAYER, V= 0 ds B V bs Fixed Immobile Charges V ds 0 0 <V gs <V hn V bs 0 V ox V y Cutoff Regime 9
11
Channel Inversion: Ohmic Regime 10 V gs >V hn 0 V ds V gs –V hn V gd >V hn N+ Drain P–Type Substrate N+ Source N+ Drain P–Type Substrate N+ Source L L'DL DV ds Metal or Polysilicon Silicon Dioxide Inversion Layer Depletion DS G DS G V dss
12
Channel Inversion: Saturation Regime 11 V gs >V hn 0 V ds =V gs –V hn V gd V hn V gs >V hn 0 V ds >V gs –V hn V gd <V hn N+ Drain P–Type Substrate N+ Source N+ Drain P–Type Substrate N+ Source L L' L V ds Metal or Polysilicon Silicon Dioxide Inversion Layer Depletion DS G DS G V dss
13
Channel Length Modulation l Modified Saturation Regime Current 12 I d | V ds >V dss =I L L – L = K n 2 W L V gs –V hn 2 1 + V ds –V dss V V =L 2 q N A s V ds –V dss +V j (Typically Under 20 Volts And As Small As 1/3 Volt For Deep Submicron MOSFETs) l Channel Modulation Voltage N+ Drain N+ Source L'DL V ds DS G V dss
14
Channel Length Modulation Parameters 13 l Parameters Average Substrate Impurity Concentration Dielectric Constant Of Silicon (1.05 pF/cm) Electronic Charge Magnitude Channel Length Modulation Voltage Built In Substrate–Drain/Source Junction Potential l Note Large Channel Length Reduces Channel Modulation Small Substrate Concentration Increases Channel Modulation l Modified Saturation Regime Current I d | V ds >V dss =I L L – L = K n 2 W L V gs –V hn 2 1 + V ds –V dss V V =L 2 q N A s V ds –V dss +V j
15
Substrate/Bulk Phenomena l Effect On Threshold Voltage l Parameters Fermi Potential; Renders Channel Surface Intrinsic Intrinsic Carrier Concentration In Substrate Dielectric Constant Of Silicon Dioxide (345 fF/cm) l Note Small Oxide Thickness Reduces Threshold Modulation Small Substrate Concentration Reduces Threshold Modulation 14 (High Hundreds Of µVolts) (Few Tenths Of Volts) ox I d = K n 2 W L V gs –V hnc 2 1 + V ds –V dss V V = q N A s C ox 2 =q N A s T 2 V h =V ho +2 V V F –V T 1 – V bs 2 V F –V T – 1
16
Threshold Voltage Modulation Threshold Correction (volts) Bulk–Source Voltage, Vbs (volts) 15
17
Mobility Degradation Due To Vertical Field 16 l Electric Field Problems Thin Oxide Layers Conduce Large Gate -To- Channel Fields For Even Small -To- Moderate Gate–Source Voltages These Enhanced Fields Impart Increasing Energies To Carriers, Thereby Causing More Carrier Collisions And Degraded Mobilities l Mobility: l Parameters Effective Carrier Mobility In Channel Vertical Field Degradation Voltage Parameter Crude One Dimension Approximation To Two Dimensional Problem in MKS Units Yields In Volts µ neff µ n 1 + V gs –V hnc V E V E (500)(10 6 ) T ox (Low Hundreds Of Volts)
18
Impact Of Mobility Degradation 17 l Static Drain Current l Other Effects Reduced Bandwidth And Increased Carrier Transit Time Smaller Current For Given Gate–Source Bias Reduced Forward Transconductance K n =µ n C ox K neff =µ C ox I d = K n 2 W L V gs –V hnc 2 1 + V ds –V dss V 1 + V gs –V hnc V E
19
Mobility Degradation Due To Lateral Field 18 l Electric Field Problems Short Channels Conduce Large Drain -To- Source Fields For Even Small -To- Moderate Drain–Source Voltages These Enhanced Fields Impart Increasing Energies To Carriers, Thereby Causing More Carrier Collisions And Degraded Mobilities At Very Large Horizontal Fields, Carrier Velocities Ultimately Saturate To A Value Of, Which Is About 0.1 µm/pSEC Saturation Occurs When Horizontal Field,,Equals Or Exceeds A Critical Value,, Which Is About 5 V/µm l Mobility And Field µ ne µ n 1 + E h E c = v sat E c +E h v =µ ne E h µ n E h 1 + E h E c E h V gs –V hn L
20
Velocity – Mobility – Field Relationships 18a Lateral Electric Field (V/µm) 0 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.09 0.1 05101520253035404550 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 Carrier Velocity (µm/psec)Normalized Carrier Mobility Carrier Velocity Normalized Mobility
21
Mobility And Lateral Field 19 l Mobility And Field l Electric Field Problems Crude Approximation For Horizontal Field, Free Carriers Exist Only Over Channel Where Voltage With Respect To The Source Is At Most Channel Length, L, Should Be Effective Channel Length, L', But This Shrinkage Is Already Accounted For By Channel Length Modulation Voltage Parameter, Is About 1.75 Volts For L = 0.35 µm V E h V gs –V hnc L = V dss L µ ne µ n 1 + E h E c µ n V gs –V hnc L E c = µ n 1 + V dss L E c
22
Volt–Ampere Impact Of High Lateral Field l Static Drain Current l Very High Fields l Comments Drain Current Scales Approximately With W, As Opposed To W/L Drain Current Almost Linear W/R To Gate–Source Voltage 20 K n =µ n C ox K neff =µ C ox I d = K n 2 W L (V gs –V ) hnc 2 1 + V ds –V dss V 1 + V gs –V hnc L E c I d W C ox v sat 2 V gs –V hnc 1 + V ds –V dss V l
23
MOS Large Signal Model Gate-Drain Capacitance Gate-Source Capacitance Drain-Bulk Capacitance Source-Bulk Capacitance Drain Overlap Capacitance Source Overlap Capacitance DBD Bulk-Drain Diode DBS Bulk-Source Diode 21 Drain Ohmic Resistance Source Ohmic Resistance Bulk Ohmic Resistance Bulk Spreading Resistance Static Drain Current
24
Device Capacitances In Saturation 22 Drain-Bulk Junction Area Source-Bulk Junction Area Zero Bias Depletion Capacitance Density C gd +C old C =W L d C ox Large (Hundreds Of fF) Moderate (High Tens Of fF) Small (Tens Of fF)
25
Approximate (Long Channel) Small Signal Model 23 cc c c c B DG g mf v ga g o v ba + v ga C old + cc C gd c c g mb v ba C gs C db c C sb C ols c S l Assumptions All Series Ohmic Resistances Are Negligible Transistor Operates In Saturation Regime "Long Channel" Approximation Invoked For Static Drain Current Model To Be Used As A Precursor To Computer–Based Studies g mf I d V gs | Q 2 K n W L I dQ g mb I d V bs | Q = b g mf b = V / 2 2 V F –V T –V bsQ g o I d V ds | Q I dQ V +V ds –V dss
26
Short Channel Small Signal Model 24 l Drain Current: l Intermediate Parameters: l Forward Transconductance: l Bulk Transconductance: l Output Conductance: I d = K n 2 W L V gs –V hnc 2 1 + V ds –V dss V 1 + V gs –V hnc L E c f = V ds –V dss V g mfs =g mf 1 +f 1 +f c 1 – V dss / 2 V 1 +f – f c / 2 1 +f c g mbs = b g mfs g o = I dQ V +V ds –V dss b = V / 2 2 V F –V T –V bsQ
27
Hypothetical Device 25 l Physical Parameters s = 1.05 pF/cm ox = 345 fF/cm l Device Parameters l Circuit Parameters
28
Static Performance l Peripheral Calculations 26 V hnc = 685.2 mV (Compensated Threshold) V hn = 35.2 mV V = 669.7 mV (Channel Length Voltage) K n = 276.0 µmho / volt (Transconductance Parameter) f = 2.218 (Channel Length Parameter) l Static Drain Current Note Short Channel -To- Long Channel Ratio of 2.35 ; Ratio Is Generally Between 1.5 And 3.0
29
Small Signal Parameters 27 l Forward Transconductance Note Short Channel -To- Long Channel Ratio of 1.14 ; Ratio Is Generally Between 0.5 And 2.0 l Bulk Transconductance Note Bulk Transconductance Is About 200 Times Smaller Than Forward Transconductance l Drain–Source Conductance Corresponds To Shunt Output Resistance Of About 5 K Mandates Conductance Enhancement Strategies When Designing High Performance Transconductors (10) –3 b = 5.02 (Bulk Parameter)
30
Device Unity Gain Frequency l l l Comments Unity Gain Frequency Is Good Device Figure Of Merit; Crude Circuit Performance Figure Of Merit Result Assumes T C gd << g mf AC Short Circuit 28 i out i in = g mf –s C gd +C old s C gs +C ols +C gd +C old T g mf C gs +C ols +C gd +C old µ n V gs –V hn L 2 2 3 + 3 L d L c c c BS D G g mf v 1 g mb v 2 g o v 2 + v 1 + c c V dd c I bias C big c i out i in i c i out C gd C old + C gs C ols +
31
Common Source Inverter 29
32
Inverter Load Resistance Calculations 30 R Leff V x I x =r ssl + r ddl +r ol 1 + bl g mfl r ol 1 1 + bl g mfl
33
Inverter Gain Calculations 31 A v = V os V s = – g mfd R Leff 1 + bd g mfd r ssd + R Leff +r ddd +r ssd r od – g mfd R Leff – g mfd 1 + bl g mfl A v – 1 1 + bl W d / L W l / L
34
Inverter Bandwidth Calculations 32 R / = V x I x =r ddd +r ssd + 1 + bl g mfd r ssd r od B 3dB 1 R Leff C L 1 + bl g mfl C L B 3dB = 1 R out C L = 1 R / | R Leff C L 1 R C L GBP A v B 3dB = g mfd C L
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.