Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Effects of Conjugated Equine Estrogen in Postmenopausal Women with Hysterectomy The Women’s Health Initiative Randomized Controlled Trial JAMA 2004;291:1701-1712.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Effects of Conjugated Equine Estrogen in Postmenopausal Women with Hysterectomy The Women’s Health Initiative Randomized Controlled Trial JAMA 2004;291:1701-1712."— Presentation transcript:

1 Effects of Conjugated Equine Estrogen in Postmenopausal Women with Hysterectomy The Women’s Health Initiative Randomized Controlled Trial JAMA 2004;291:1701-1712.

2 Postmenopausal Hormone Use Observational studies suggested –30%– 50% reduction in cardiac risk –8% – 30% increase in breast cancer –Strong benefit for osteoporosis In 1980’s – 90’s –Increasing use of hormone therapy for long-term cardiovascular disease prevention

3 WHI Hormone Trial Specific Aims Primary Endpoint: To test whether CEE reduces the incidence of CHD and other CVD –Definition of CHD: Nonfatal MI plus CHD death Primary Safety Endpoint: To assess whether CEE increases the risk of breast cancer Secondary Endpoints: To test whether CEE reduces the incidence of hip fractures and all osteoporosis-related fractures separately

4 Women’s Health Initiative Timeline 19902005 19931998

5 WHI Hormone Trial Design Hysterectomy CEE 0.625 mg/d + medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) 2.5 mg/d E Alone N = 10,739 YES NO Placebo Conjugated equine estrogens (CEE) 0.625 mg/d Placebo E + P N=16,608

6 Eligibility Age 50-79 years at first screen Postmenopausal Likely to reside in clinic area for at least 3 years Providing written informed consent

7 Excluded if: Severely underweight Severe hypertension (>200/105) Severe menopausal symptoms Substance abuse, mental illness, dementia History of: –Cancer in last 10 years –Melanoma any time –Stroke or heart attack in last 6 months –Previous fractures treated with hormones Any condition likely to limit survival < 3 yrs So these were generally healthy women and this was a primary prevention trial

8 Follow-up Methods 6 weeks after randomization: phone contact –Assess symptoms –Reinforce adherence Every 6 months: phone or clinic contact –Assess adherence –Assess symptoms –Determine if outcomes had occurred Annually: clinic visit –Mammograms + clinical breast exams –Assess adherence –Assess symptoms –Determine if outcomes had occurred

9 Study Medication Use Intolerable symptoms e.g., breast tenderness –Reduced number of days of treatment –No unblinding for management Major event possibly related to hormones –Study meds stopped Temporarily for fracture, immobilization, surgery Permanently for breast CA, DVT/PE, malignant melanoma, meningioma, TG > 1000 mg/dl, if participant’s health provider prescribed open label hormones Resumption up to participant’s health provider for MI or stroke –No unblinding for discontinuation of medications

10 Ascertainment of Outcomes Self report of diagnosis/hospitalization Medical records obtained Local WHI physician adjudicated (coded) events (blinded to treatment assignment) Central adjudication (blinded to treatment assignment) –CHD –Stroke –VTE –Cancer –Hip fractures

11 Events during the Hormone Trial April 2000 – Participants notified of increase in CV events during first 2 years July 2001 – Participants informed risk does not disappear after 2 years July 2002 – –E+P trial intervention terminated due to increased breast cancer risk and overall risks exceeding benefits; Principal results published (JAMA 2002;288:331-333). –E alone trial is continued. February 2004 – NIH terminates E-alone intervention due to increased stroke risk and absence of CHD benefit March 1, 2004 – E- alone participants stop study pills

12 Baseline Characteristics of women in the WHI Estrogen alone trial

13 Age at entry CEE N = 5310 Placebo N = 5429 50-591637 (30.8)1673 (30.8) 60-692387 (45.0)2465 (45.4) 70-791286 (24.2)1291 (23.8)

14 Age of E-alone participants at entry Percent

15 Race/Ethnicity Percent

16 Age at hysterectomy CEE N = 5310 Placebo N = 5429 < 402100 (39.8)2149 (39.8) 40-492281 (43.2)2275 (42.2) 50-54501 (9.5)566 (10.5) > 55401 (7.6)404 (7.5)

17 Bilateral Oophorectomy CEE N = 5310 Placebo N = 5429 Bilateral Oophorectomy 1938 (39.5)2111 (42.0)

18 History of Hormone Use CEE N = 5310 Placebo N = 5429 Never2769 (52.2)2770 (51.1) Past1871 (35.2)1948 (35.9) Current (3 month wash-out before randomization) 669 (12.6)708 (13.0)

19 Duration of prior hormone use CEE N = 5310 Placebo N = 5429 < 5 yrs1352 (53.2)1412 (53.1) 5-10 yrs469 (18.5)515 (19.4) > 10 yrs720 (28.3)732 (27.5)

20 Body Mass Index CEE N = 5310 Placebo N = 5429 < 251110 (21.0)1096 (20.3) 25-291795 (34.0)1912 (35.5) > 302376 (45.0)2383 (44.2) Mean BMI30.1

21 Smoking Status CEE N = 5310 Placebo N = 5429 Never2739 (51.9)2705 (50.4) Past1986 (37.8)2089 (38.9) Current542 (10.3)571 (10.6)

22 Medical History CEE N = 5310 Placebo N = 5429 Prior MI * 165 (3.1)172 (3.2) CABG/PTCA * 120 (2.3)114 (2.1) Angina308 (5.8)306 (5.7) Stroke76 (1.4)92 (1.7) DVT/PE87 (1.6)84 (1.5) * 441 (4.1%) women with “hard” CHD events prior to enrollment (> 6mos)

23 CHD Risk Status at Entry CEE N = 5310 Placebo N = 5429 Diabetes treatment410 (7.7)411 (7.6) Hypertension (Rx or > 140/90) 2386 (48.0)2387 (47.4) Elevated Cholesterol (on Rx) 694 (14.5)766 (15.9) Statin Use394 (7.4)427 (7.9) Aspirin Use1030 (19.4)1069 (19.7)

24 Baseline Characteristics of E-alone Participants (N=10,739) by Randomization Assignment NMeanSDNMeanSD Age (yrs) at screening531063.67.3542963.67.3 BMI (kg/m 2 )528130.16.1539130.16.2 Systolic BP (mm Hg)5310130.417.55429130.217.6 Diastolic BP (mm Hg)531076.59.2542976.59.4 CEE Placebo

25 Ethnicity White400775.5407575.1 Black78214.783515.4 Hispanic3226.13336.1 American Indian410.8340.6 Asian/Pacific Islander861.6781.4 Unknown721.4741.4 CEEPlacebo N%N%N%N% Baseline Characteristics of E-alone Participants (N=10,739) by Randomization Assignment

26 Treated diabetes4107.74117.6 Treated for hypertension238648.0238747.4 or BP > 140/90 High cholesterol69414.576615.9 requiring pills Statin use at baseline3947.44277.9 Aspirin (>80mg) use103019.4106919.7 at baseline CEEPlacebo N%N%N%N% Baseline Characteristics of E-alone Participants (N=10,739) by Randomization Assignment

27 History of MI1653.11723.2 History of angina3085.83065.7 History of CABG/PTCA1202.31142.1 History of stroke761.4921.7 History of DVT or PE871.6841.5 CEEPlacebo N%N%N%N% Baseline Characteristics of E-alone Participants (N=10,739) by Randomization Assignment

28 Hormone use Never276952.2277051.1 Past187135.2194835.9 Current66912.670813.0 Duration of prior hormone use (years) <5135253.2141253.1 5 - 1046918.551519.4 10+72028.373227.5 CEEPlacebo N%N%N%N% Baseline Characteristics of E-alone Participants (N=10,739) by Randomization Assignment

29 Parity Never pregnant / 4899.34618.5 no term pregnancy >1 term pregnancy477990.7493291.5 Age at first birth <20119328.1123428.0 20 - 29284667.0291466.1 30+2104.92605.9 CEEPlacebo N%N%N%N% Baseline Characteristics of E-alone Participants (N=10,739) by Randomization Assignment

30 Female relative had89318.087017.1 breast cancer CEEPlacebo N%N%N%N% Baseline Characteristics of E-alone Participants (N=10,739) by Randomization Assignment

31 Fracture at age 55+67614.064313.2 Falls in last 12 months 0330067.0323064.8 1 97519.8102420.5 2 4228.64789.6 3 or more2314.72555.1 CEEPlacebo N%N%N%N% Baseline Characteristics of E-alone Participants (N=10,739) by Randomization Assignment

32 Cumulative Drop-out and Drop-in Rates by Randomization Assignment and Follow-up Time

33 Intermediate Outcomes

34 Lipid Levels (8.6% subsample) Percent change, 1 yr

35

36 Clinical Outcomes

37 CEE and Coronary Heart Disease Events (Annualized %) by randomization assignment CHD † 177(0.49%)199(0.54%)0.91(0.75,1.12)(0.72,1.15) CHD Death54(0.15%)59(0.16%)0.94(0.65,1.36)(0.54,1.63) Non-fatal MI132(0.37%)153(0.41%)0.89(0.70,1.12)(0.63,1.26) * Adjusted for multiple comparisons across time (OBF procedures). A Bonferroni adjustment for 6 outcomes was applied to all outcomes other than CHD, Breast Cancer and the global Index. † CHD includes acute MI requiring hospitalization, silent MI determined from serial electrocardiograms and coronary deaths. There were 14 silent MIs. 95% CI CEEPlaceboHazard RatioNominalAdjusted *

38 Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Cumulative Hazards for CHD CHD HR, 0.91 95% nCI, 0.75-1.12

39 CHD events by years since randomization YearCEEPlaceboHR 126231.16 227231.20 322250.89 421270.79 530241.28 631261.23 7+20510.40 P-value for trend with time, 0.02.

40 Risk of CHD events by prior disease CEEPlaceboHR95% CI Prior MI or revascularization (N=441) 33311.040.63-1.71 No prior disease1431620.910.73-1.14

41 CEE and Stroke Events (Annualized %) By randomization assignment Stroke158(0.44%)118(0.32%)1.39(1.10,1.77)(0.97,1.99) Fatal stoke15(0.04%)14(0.04%)1.13(0.54,2.34)(0.38,3.36) Non-fatal stroke114(0.32%)85(0.23%)1.39(1.05,1.84)(0.91,2.12) 95% CI CEEPlaceboHazard RatioNominalAdjusted

42 Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Cumulative Hazards for Stroke Stroke HR, 1.39 95% nCI, 1.10-1.77

43 Risk of stroke by prior disease CEEPlaceboHR95% CI Prior stroke (N=168)661.670.52-5.36 No prior stroke1521121.391.09-1.78

44 CEE and Venous Thromboembolic Events (Annualized %) By randomization assignment VTE † 101(0.28%)78(0.21%)1.33(0.99,1.79)(0.86,2.08) DVT † 77(0.21%)54(0.15%)1.47(1.04,2.08)(0.87,2.47) PE † 48(0.13%)37(0.10%)1.34(0.87,2.06)(0.70,2.55) † VTE, venous thromboembolic disease; DVT, deep vein thrombosis; PE, pulmonary embolism 95% CI CEEPlaceboHazard RatioNominalAdjusted

45 Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Cumulative Hazards for PE PE HR, 1.34 95% nCI 0.87-2.06

46 CEE and Cardiovascular Disease Events (Annualized %) By randomization assignment Total CVD811(2.25%)746(2.01%)1.12(1.01,1.24)(0.97,1.30) 95% CI CEEPlaceboHazard RatioNominalAdjusted

47 CEE and Cancer Incidence (Annualized %) By randomization assignment Invasive breast94(0.26%)124(0.33%)0.77(0.59,1.01)(0.57,1.06) cancer Colorectal cancer61(0.17%)58(0.16%)1.08(0.75,1.55)(0.63,1.86) Total cancer372(1.03%)408(1.10%)0.93(0.81,1.07)(0.75,1.15) 95% CI CEEPlaceboHazard RatioNominalAdjusted

48 Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Cumulative Hazards for Breast Cancer Invasive Breast Cancer HR, 0.77 95% nCI, 0.59-1.01

49 Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Cumulative Hazards for Colorectal Cancer Colorectal Cancer HR, 1.08 95% nCI, 0.75-1.55

50 CEE and Fracture Events (Annualized %) By randomization assignment Hip fracture38(0.11%)64(0.17%)0.61(0.41,0.91)(0.33,1.11) Vertebral fracture39(0.11%)64(0.17%)0.62(0.42,0.93)(0.34,1.13) Total fracture503(1.39%)724(1.95%)0.70(0.63,0.79)(0.59,0.83) 95% CI CEEPlaceboHazard RatioNominalAdjusted

51 Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Cumulative Hazards for Hip Fracture Hip Fracture HR, 0.61 95% nCI, 0.41-0.91

52 CEE Summary Measures (Annualized %) By randomization assignment Death from other193(0.53%)185(0.50%)1.08(0.88,1.32)(0.79,1.46) causes Total death291(0.81%)289(0.78%)1.04(0.88,1.22)(0.81,1.32) † Global index is the first event for each participant from among the following types: CHD; stroke; PE; breast cancer; colorectal cancer; hip fracture; and death from other causes. Global index † 692(1.92%)705(1.90%)1.01(0.91,1.12)(0.89,1.14) 95% CI CEEPlaceboHazard RatioNominalAdjusted

53 Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Cumulative Hazards for Death Death HR, 1.04 95% nCI, 0.88-1.22

54 Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Cumulative Hazards for Global Index Global Index HR, 1.01 95% nCI, 0.91-1.12

55 Causes of Death (Annualized Percentages) by Randomization Assignment CEEPlacebo Number randomized53105429 Mean follow-up time (months) Total deaths291(0.81%)289(0.78%) Adjudicated deaths278(0.77%)272(0.73%) Cardiovascular93(0.26%)95(0.26%) Breast cancer4(0.01%)8(0.02%) Other cancer110(0.30%)118(0.32%) Other known cause51(0.14%)38(0.10%) Unknown cause20(0.06%)13(0.04%)

56 CEE Effects on Cardiovascular Outcomes by Age

57 CEE Effects on Cancer Outcomes by Age

58 CEE Effects on Hip Fracture by Age

59 Summary Measures of CEE Effects by Age

60 Sensitivity Analyses HR (compliers)HR (int. to treat) Stroke1.741.39 PE1.991.34 Total Mortality1.261.04 CHD0.890.91 Breast CA0.650.77 Colorectal CA0.921.08 Hip fracture0.480.61 Higher risk; Lower risk

61 Women’s Health Initiative Trial of E–Alone Summary

62 Absolute risk differences per 10,000 person/years with CEE 12 more strokes (p =.007) 6 fewer hip fractures (p =.01) –56 fewer osteoporotic fractures at any site (p <.001) 7 more VTE events (ns) 7 fewer breast cancers (ns) 5 fewer CHD events (ns) No difference in colorectal cancer No difference in total mortality No difference in pre-defined global index

63 WHI E-Alone: summary 1 st large-scale, long-term, randomized, double- blind, placebo-controlled trial to test unopposed estrogen on rates of chronic diseases finds that CEE –Increases risk of stroke –Reduces hip and other fractures –Does not significantly affect CHD rates –Does not increase risk of breast cancer risk

64 Implications CEE provides no clear benefit for chronic disease prevention Overall findings support current FDA recommendations to use postmenopausal hormone therapy for severe symptoms, at the lowest effective dose, for the shortest time. Women should be counseled about stroke risk, but no increased risk of heart disease or breast cancer for 6.8 years of use.


Download ppt "Effects of Conjugated Equine Estrogen in Postmenopausal Women with Hysterectomy The Women’s Health Initiative Randomized Controlled Trial JAMA 2004;291:1701-1712."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google