1. Journal Quality and Journal Development: Competing on the international stage May 2015 Marcin Dembowski Regional Sales Manager Russia, Baltic States & CIS Oxford University Press

2. Agenda About OUP Journal Development –What makes a good journal? –Defining goals and why they matter –Achieving goals

3. The University of Oxford Overview The oldest university in the English speaking world. It is a collegiate research based institution.

4. Oxford University and Research Where does it rank? 1.4* means world leading according to REF

5. Oxford University Press

6. Our Mission 6 John Fell Clarendon Presentation—Tim Barton (November 2011) Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the University's objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide.

7. A Very Short Introduction Origins date back to 1478 Largest university press 25 th largest publisher in the world 6,000 employees worldwide Over 5,000 titles per year, and 300 journals

8. Oxford University Press Products

9. Support to Students Researchers and Academics OUP in Humanities Reference Materials ODO, OBO, ORO Framing the question for exploration & reflection Scholarly Resources OHO, UPSO, Journals, Research Encyclopaedias Build argument & Support with evidence Oxford Index Generating related OUP content to deepen your search

10. Where do OUP Resources Fit in your Research Journey? Subject Specific Resources Each resource provides a vital step on the research journey, from quick fact checking, to reviewing the literature in a field, to keeping up to date with the latest research.

11. Oxford University Press (OUP) publishes the highest quality journals and delivers this research to the widest possible audience. www.oxfordjournals.org We achieve this by working closely with our society partners, authors, and subscribers in order to provide them with publishing services that support their research needs.

12. Journal Development 12

13. Starting/Running The Journal 1.Appoint an Editor-in-Chief and Editorial Board 2.Develop conceptual framework 3.Invite authors 4.Peer-review contributions 5.Regular review of progress to determine new topics and update priorities 6.Commission new articles or updates based on user feedback

14. What makes a good journal? 14 John Fell Committed editors and editorial board Appropriate Aims and Scope – meeting community need Content –Range of subjects –Quality –Geographical distribution –Volume of content Robust, ethical peer review Visibility – how easy is it to find and access your content Readership

15. The role of the editor(s) 15 John Fell Objective : ambassador for the Journal, working with the Publisher and wider editorial team to set the direction for the journal, establish its reputation, and encourage/process high- quality submissions that support the Journal’s mission

16. 16 Mobilizing the community of experts

17. Global network of research

18. The role of the editor(s) 18 John Fell Setting journals Scope and Strategy Establishing and enforcing peer review process to select best manuscripts Commissioning manuscript submissions in areas identified in the Journal’s editorial strategy Setting Journal policies e.g. authorship, conflict of interest, publishing ethics Strategic development (supported by others) Developing and maintaining an extensive network for promotional purposes

19. The role of the editor(s) solutions Opportunities/Threats decideimplement democracydictatorship Democraship Adizes Institute 1997 - 2015

20. When do journals need development? 20 John Fell Young journals: –To attract more submissions –To grow into new markets –To increase quality Mature journals: –To respond to market/competitor changes –To grow into new markets –To increase quality ALWAYS

21. Lifecycle of an Organization/journal Stable Early Bureaucracy Adizes Institute 1997 - 2015

22. Role of Editor(s) management opporthreats It is not the strongest of the species that survive, nor the most intelligent, but the one most responsive to change. Charles Darwin GrowingAging Adizes Institute 1997 - 2015

23. Journal development process 1.Define your mission 2.Assess competition/market 3.Review current position 4.Set clear goals 5.Agree action plans 6.Set milestones 7.Review progress towards milestones 23

24. Journal development process Review your current position 1.Author demographics 2.Impact factor 3.Subject coverage 4.Reputation/profile 5.Business models 6.Quality of papers 7.Sales/Finances 8.Usage 24 or

25. is The “Is” way of perceiving reality refers to the present reality. Perception of the reality Adizes Institute 1997 - 2015

26. should “Should” way of perceiving reality refers to what you believe is the right thing to do, where the value exceeds the cost. Perception of the reality Adizes Institute 1997 - 2015

27. want The “Want” way of perceiving reality refers to what we want to do/be regardless of the cost. Perception of the reality Adizes Institute 1997 - 2015

28. want mine should is Mine What you want should be and it is. Adizes Institute 1997 - 2015

29. “Our journal is the best in Russia/Europe/World.” “We can be the best journal in Russia.” “We should be the best journal in Russia.” Perception of the reality Adizes Institute 1997 - 2015

30. Criteria You Might Look At: Rankings (example Thomson Reuters Impact factors; the Association of Business Schools ABS etc.) Number of downloads (utility) Dissemination of journal (where it is read) Links to societies/associations Relevance of content and publishing ethos International

31. Journal development process Set clear objectives 1.Specific 2.Realistic 3.Consistent 31

32. Editors are looking for “something new and preferably surprising” according to Dr. Peter Smith, a Cambridge philosopher and former editor of Analysis, the philosophical journal.

33. Be Careful: There are 1,000,000’s of published studies. You need to MASTER your subject/topics: be aware of works completed by others, updates, etc.

34. What makes a good paper? HINT: Editors and reviewers look for … Originality – what’s new about subject, treatment or results? Relevance to and extension of existing knowledge Research methodology – are conclusions valid and objective? Clarity, structure and quality of writing – does it communicate well? Sound, logical progression of argument So what?’ factors! Recency and relevance of references Adherence to the editorial scope and objectives of the journal A good title, keywords and a well written abstract

35. www.oxfordjournals.org

38. Disc over abilit y and the Oxfor d Index / Robe rt Fabe r 38

39. Disc over abilit y and the Oxfor d Index / Robe rt Fabe r 39

40. Disc over abilit y and the Oxfor d Index / Robe rt Fabe r 40

41. Journal development process Action plans and milestones Who to do what, by when? How will you know you are on the right track? 41

42. Well managed journal: effective efficient effective efficient short run long run functional (P)rovide client needs organic proactive systematic (I)ntegrate (E)ntrepreneur (A)dminister Profit (P)urpose

43. English language support for academic researchers worldwide

44. Overview Oxford Language Editing was launched in early 2014 by Oxford University Press The services offered by Oxford Language Editing provide english language support to international researchers These services are for researchers worldwide, wherever they intend to publish their work Oxford Language Editing helps researchers to maximize their chances of publication, but does not guarantee publication

45. Where are customers come from

46. What do our customers say about us? Key customer benefits 1. ESTABLISHED LANGUAGE EXPERTISE: Oxford University Press has a unique position at the heart of the English language through its publication of the Oxford English Dictionary, award-winning reference resources, and English Language Teaching materials. 2. EXCELLENT EDITORS: We work with the best editors with experience in research methods and a proven track recording within publishing. They are all subject matter experts with native-level English, and editing experience, who understand the requirements of academic publications and the discipline- specific terminology. 3. TWO-STAGE EDITING: All work is reviewed by both a language editor and an academic editor. Not only are grammatical, spelling, and linguistic issues corrected by the language editor, but, the academic editor ensures that content is clearly communicated and gives suggestions and feedback. “I am very satisfied with the quality of editing. The paper I submitted for editing was very technical. The editors helped a lot to make it more reader friendly. They also gave useful tips. I am very satisfied with the customer service. It’s professional, friendly and highly responsive.” (Customer from Switzerland, 2015)

47. What do our customers say about us? Key customer benefits 4. IN-DEPTH FEEDBACK: In the second-stage of our process, our academic editors dedicate time to reviewing the research content in every paper and providing in-depth comments and feedback to the author 5. IMPROVED CHANCE OF PUBLICATION: The high quality work carried out by our language editors and academic editors ensures that work is expressed in the highest quality English and maximizes chances of publication. 6. EXCELLENT CUSTOMER SERVICE: Our dedicated Oxford Language Editing team manages the editing process in-house and provides a personalized service to all researchers. We assign language editors and academic editors who we know will deliver the very best editing service. “The turnover speed is quick, the language editing is careful and deep, and the editor gave some general suggestions regarding the research topic such like highlights and ref examples, these are helpful to improve the writing of the paper.” (Customer from China, 2015)

48. What do our customers say about us? Key customer benefits 7. EXPERTISE IN EVERY DISCIPLINE: We offer our services in all disciplines, as we have highly qualified freelance editors in Medicine, Science, Humanities, and Social Sciences. 8. COMPETITIVE PRICING: Our pricing is calculated according to the length of the work we are editing; we are priced in line with our competitors and offer discounts for larger numbers of papers. 9. TURNAROUND TIME: We carry out our two-stage editing process within seven working days but will do our very best to accommodate the needs of every researcher. “My co-operation with OLE was really positive experience. I’m more than satisfied with the editing, which was performed with my article, and especially with quickness of the work and with friendly manner of conversation.” (Customer from Russia, 2014)

49. Partnering with institutions We work with institutions to support their researchers who are preparing work for publication We offer our services in all disciplines and partner with individual faculties or entire institutions We offer large discounts to institutions wishing to purchase language editing in large volumes We offer short-term trials to institutions wishing to use our service before a longer term commercial agreement

50. www.oxfordlanguageediting.com jane.wiejak@oup.com – please contact Jane directly with any questions

51. Research Encyclopedias

52. 52 Oxford Research Encyclopedias Continuously updated encyclopedias in 20 disciplines Deliver in-depth interpretative overviews Written and vetted by scholars for scholars and students Map the entirety of a field of inquiry; evolve as the field evolves Direct research journeys to other relevant trusted content

53. Disciplines Covered 53

54. Thank you! 54 Any questions? marcin.dembowski@oup.com – please contact me directly with any questionsmarcin.dembowski@oup.com