Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

The U.S. Food and Fiber Industry

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "The U.S. Food and Fiber Industry"— Presentation transcript:

1 The U.S. Food and Fiber Industry
Chapter 2

2 Discussion Topics Review of index numbers and real value of money
What is the food and fiber industry? Review the changing complexion of farming Discuss the role of other sectors in the food and fiber industry

3 Output and Price Indices
Apple Production April Price Year Million Lbs. Output Index $/lb Price Index 1985 4,162 0.86 $0.66 0.91 1990 4,828 1.00 0.72 1995 5,289 1.10 0.84 1.16 2002 4,278 0.89 0.95 1.32 1.10 = 5,289÷4,828 Output 10% higher in 1995 than it was in 1990…. 1.16 = 0.84÷0.72 Price 16% higher in 1995 that it was in 1990…. 1990 is the base year as index set to 1.0 Page 14 Page 14

4 Nominal and Real Expenditures
Nominal Expenditures (Mil. $) CPI ( ) Real Expenditures (Mil. $) Year 120.3 0.824 145.99 1985 168.8 1.076 156.91 1990 248.5 1.307 190.10 1995 302.4 1.524 198.44 2002 385.8 1.722 224.03 = 302.4÷1.524 The increasing CPI eroded the purchasing power of the dollar…. CPI was 52.4% higher in 1995 than it was in period avg is the base year for the CPI

5 Characteristics of the Food and Fiber System

6 The Agricultural Sector
The agricultural (food) industry can be divided into four major sectors: Farm service Agricultural Producers Processors Wholesale/Retail distributors and marketers The final marketing chain component is represented by consumers Pages 17-26

7 The Agricultural Sector
Farm Service Sector (Implement dealers, chemical sales, fertilizer sales etc.) Producers (Farmers, ranchers, etc.) Consumers Processors (Manufacturers, bottlers, etc.) Marketers (Distributors, retailers, etc.) Pages 17-26

8 Agricultural Sector Importance
An estimated one-fifth of all jobs in the U.S. are related to some aspect of the food industry In many developing countries, more than half of the labor force engaged in agriculture On a global basis the food industry is the largest industry in terms of people employed and value of product Pages 17-26

9 The Agricultural Sector
Farm Service Sector (Implement dealers, chemical sales, fertilizer sales etc.) Consumers Pages 17-26

10 The Agricultural Sector
The farm service sector provides producers with inputs such as feed, fertilizer, fuel, equipment and chemicals. Many firms are multinational corporations: John Deere, DuPont, and Monsanto There are also a variety of small, local service companies that serve diverse needs of local farmers for irrigation equipment, farm structures, etc. Pages 17-26

11 The Agricultural Sector
Also numerous firms that provide farmers with financial services i.e., Banking, accounting, insurance, legal advice, risk management and agronomic consulting As farming becomes increasingly complex, farmers are pressed to rely heavily on providers of farm services A fast-growing, highly localized sector of the food industry Pages 17-26

12 Relative Importance of Farm Input Expenditures
Agriculture sector as a whole Relative values depend on farm type Page 27

13 Relative Importance of Dairy Farm Input Expenditures
Source: Economic Research Service, USDA Data is for 2009

14 The Agricultural Sector
Farm Service Sector (Implement dealers, chemical, sales, etc.) Producers (Farmers, ranchers, etc.) Consumers Pages 17-26

15 The Agricultural Sector
The producer sector includes those engaged in the biological processes associated with production of food/fiber i.e., Farmers, ranchers, fruit growers, nurserymen, etc. Producers purchase from farm service sector and sell to the processor sector There is an increasing movement for producers selling directly to consumers Pages 17-26

16 The Agricultural Sector
Farm Service Sector (Implement dealers, chemical, sales, etc.) Producers (Farmers, ranchers, etc.) Consumers Processors (Manufacturers, bottlers, etc.) Pages 17-26

17 The Agricultural Sector
The processor sector creates value by converting agricultural commodities into products that consumers want Processors change the form of the primary product Processors can provide a storage function (i.e., aged cheddar) Processors can provide transportation services Processors add value to the raw agricultural commodity via the above activities Pages 17-26

18 The Agricultural Sector
Processors can be divided into two types: Commodities processors – (i.e., milling wheat into flour for use as an input) Food products processors - (i.e., cheese plant that transform milk into cheese for consumption) Processors (Manufacturers, bottlers, etc.) Commodities Food Products Pages 17-26

19 The Agricultural Sector
Sometimes a company engages in both types of processing activities Hershey Processes cocoa beans into powder (commodity) Makes candy for direct sale (food product) ConAgra Foods Processes soybeans into oil, to make Blue Bonnet®, Fleischmann’s®, and Parkay® margarines (commodity) Sells soybean oil directly to consumers Pages 17-26

20 The Agricultural Sector
Food product processors can be further divided into two categories Processors that produce for retail food consumers Those that produce for food service (via distributors) Pages 17-26

21 The Agricultural Sector
Processors (Manufacturers, bottlers, etc.) Commodities Food Products At-Home Away from Home Pages 17-26

22 The Agricultural Sector
Today, approximately 50% of food expenditures is spent on food eaten away-from-home Pages 17-26

23 The Agricultural Sector
A good example of a food product processor is the Coca-Cola Company Purchases high-fructose corn sweetener (HFCS) from a commodity processor such as ADM or Cargill Combines HFCS with other ingredients using their secret formula to produce Coke® In cans and bottles for the retail market In bulk for the food service industry Pages 17-26

24 The Agricultural Sector
Farm Service Sector (Implement dealers, chemical, sales, etc.) Producers (Farmers, ranchers, etc.) Consumers Processors (Manufacturers, bottlers, etc.) Marketers (Distributors, retailers, etc.) Pages 17-26

25 The Agricultural Sector
Processors (Manufacturers, bottlers, etc.) Commodities Food Products At-Home Away from Home Wholesalers Distributors Marketers Pages 17-26

26 The Agricultural Sector
The marketing sector creates value in the food industry by changing the time and place of food Ties the producer and consumer sectors together Coca-Cola plays the role of wholesaler and distributor in the marketing sector Pages 17-26

27 The Agricultural Sector
Processors (Manufacturers, bottlers, etc.) Commodities Food Products At-Home Away from Home Sells to Final Consumer Wholesalers Distributors Retailers Restaurants, Institutions, etc

28 Coordination in Agriculture
Coordination: The communication system that conveys consumer wants to the producer As shown above, marketers are companies that tie the final food consumer to the processor Their job is to make certain that whatever the consumer wants is available when and where the consumer wants it Pages 17-26

29 Coordination in Agriculture
Traditionally, coordination has been accomplished by prices sending signals from one link in the marketing chain to the next This is changing with management/strategic alliances replacing markets and the price system signaling the types of products to produce i.e., Dairy Farmers of America and Dean Foods in the Northeast Pages 17-26

30 Coordination in Agriculture
At the fluid processing level, large consolidated processors dominate the fluid milk industry. These include: (1) Dean Foods, which has a long term strategic alliance (full supply contracts) with DFA, and operates 12 plants in the Mideast and processes an estimated million pounds of milk per month at these plants…... Prof. Ron Cotterill, Univ. of CT, 2005 Pages 17-26

31 Coordination in Agriculture
Historically most retail stores Purchase products from wholesalers Wholesalers Purchased in bulk from processors Sell in smaller batches to retailers Many smaller retailers still use this system Many larger retail chains combine wholesale and retail functions Reduces transaction costs Reduced costs can be Passed on to consumers as lower prices or Captured by the producer as higher profits Pages 17-26

32 Coordination in Agriculture
One of the the largest U.S. food retailer (by sales volume) is Kroger $66 billion of food & other items/ year Nearly 2,500 retail outlets. Kroger does both wholesaling & food product processing 42 plants making 3,000 products sold by the chain This illustrates a dominant trend in the food system know as vertical integration Several steps in the food system chain are placed under single management control

33 Coordination in Agriculture
Vertical integration allows a firm to coordinate the food system stages via internal management Without integration: Coordination is accomplished by price signals sent to and received from various markets With increased vertical integration → An increase in the role of management in coordination →A decline in the role of markets in the coordination of the food system

34 Coordination in Agriculture
What are the pros and cons of non-market coordination? Markets and prices are highly visible and the consumer has many choices Non-market coordination can be more efficient (particularly in large volumes) than market price coordination →lower prices to the consumer

35 Coordination in Agriculture
What does the consumer want—more choice or lower prices? The answer is clear when one compares the successes of Sears (“Good, better, and best”) vs. Wal-Mart (“Everyday low prices”) over the past 20 years Wal-Mart has outpaced other competitors over this time period

36 Structure of Agriculture
Physical structure Fewer number of farms but larger-sized Increasing use of capital relative to labor Increasing productivity per unit of input Financial structure and performance Volatility of net farm income reduced by subsidies although dairy is an exception Declining debt use strengthens equity position Recovering real estate values after sharp declines during financial crises of mid-1980s Pages 17-26

37 Expansion of Agricultural Production
30% ↑ Page 22

38 Declining Role of Hired Farm Labor
Capital Materials Note: There is an error in the text Page 21

39 Increased Volatility for Some Sectors
$/cwt This is the price used for cheese production Page 21

40 Structure of Agriculture
There is public concern that the family farm is giving way to large, impersonal, factory farms. Farm operators are about 1.6% of the U.S. population Characterizing attributes of the American farms and farmers → Study of farm structure. What do farms in the U.S. look like today? Pages 17-26

41 Structure of Agriculture
In 1915: 6.5 million U.S. farms Approximately 2 million farms today The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) defines a farm as: Any establishment that produces (or should produce) at least $1,000 of farm products each year Pages 17-26

42 Structure of Agriculture
With roughly 305 million Americans, the average American farmer feeds himself and 152 others Exports account for an additional 50 persons The U.S. food chain can viewed as an inverted pyramid from producer to consumer A very narrow base made up farm operators Pages 17-26

43 Structure of Agriculture
Popular press often asserts that farming is being taken over by large, corporate farms 2 million U.S. farms, 98% are family farms Family farms produce about 85% of the total agricultural production value 90% are owned by sole proprietors, rest owned by partnerships or multifamily corp. Non-family farms 2.2% of all farm units Produce 15% of total farm output Pages 17-26

44 Structure of Agriculture
Using the USDA U.S. farm typology 14% or 300,000 are retired 40% of farm operators listed primary occupation as a non-farm occupation i.e. Hobby farm where operator works primarily off-farm & maintains farm as part of lifestyle 38% listed occupation as farm with gross sales less then $250,000 Profit rate of 3% →$7,500 profit → 8% or 160,000 farms are large, economically viable enterprises Account for about 2/3 of farm sales Pages 17-26

45 Structure of Agriculture
What is the typical American farm like? Farm numbers: Most are either retirement homes or hobby farms. Almost are family farms: Only about 20,000 large, non-family farms Clear trend among these food producers is toward fewer, larger farm units Increasingly specialized in what they produce Pages 17-26

46 Structure of Agriculture
Lessons to be learned from the study of the structure of U.S. farms There is no such thing as an average farm Averages cover up more than they reveal Pages 17-26

47 Structure of Agriculture
Increasing public policy concerns as to the degree of concentration in food processing Concentration: The degree to which a small number of firms account for a large market share Example of recent USDA/Department of Justice hearings as to competitiveness in the U.S. food sector Pages 17-26

48 Structure of Agriculture
Pages 17-26

49 Structure of Agriculture
1st set of joint DOJ/USDA workshops to discuss competition and regulatory issues in the agriculture industry Workshop goals: Promote dialogue among interested parties Foster learning with respect to appropriate legal and economic analyses of these issues Listen to and learn from parties with real-world experience in the agric. sector Pages 17-26

50 Structure of Agriculture
A measure of concentration is the % of the total market accounted for by the four (or any other number) largest producers (CR4). U.S. breakfast cereal industry has a CR4 of 87% Virtually all baby food is produced by the three largest firms Pages 17-26

51 Structure of Agriculture
Significant concentration in meat packing Beef processing has a CR4 of 85% 1 of these being foreign owned Smaller competitors bought out via consolidation Large poultry producer, Tyson Foods, recently bought the second-largest beef processor Some beef cattle producers have called for Federal legislation to prevent any further consolidation Pages 17-26

52 Structure of Agriculture
Is concentration bad? Processors say consolidating into fewer, larger firms allows them to cut costs They assert it benefits consumers Need to consolidate due to consolidation at the retail level Opponents argue that it provides the processors with unusual market power Allows them to buy from farmers with little market power at prices that border on exploitation Unequal bargaining power Pages 17-26

53 Globalization of Agriculture
Commodity processors tend to be on the forefront of globalization Because demand for processing technologies is truly global as we all need food to survive. The most successful commodity processors are very internationalized with processing facilities world-wide Pages 17-26

54 Globalization of Agriculture
Globalization in food product processing has not been as strong Consumers have different tastes and preferences across countries i.e., final food product soybeans may be soy protein meal in country A, tofu in country B, and a steak in country C Food product processors are making a push to globalize Processed food market growth dramatically increasing in many developing countries Contrast this with stagnant growth in the U.S. Pages 17-26

55 Globalization of Agriculture
Criticism of Globalization Food security—every country wants to be certain its nutritional needs will be met. As an industry becomes globalized, individual countries lose control to multinational companies that may have different objectives Global concentration: similar to the issue of industrial concentration A Brazilian firm, the world’s largest beef processor has acquired of one of the largest U.S. beef processors Pages 17-26

56 Farm Profitability What do we mean by farm profitability?
Cash receipts from farm marketings (Price x Quantity) + Government payments + Other income from farm sources = Gross farm income – Production expenses = Nominal net farm income ÷ Broadly-based price deflator = Real net farm income Page 24

57 Instability of Net Farm Income
Real net farm income in 1983 had the same purchasing power as 1933 Page 24

58 Financial Structure What do we mean by farm profitability?
Value of real estate assets (i.e., owned land, buildings, etc.) + Value of non-real estate assets (i.e., tractor, combines, stored grain, etc. + Value of financial assets (i.e., savings accounts, IRA’s) = Total assets – Total liabilities or debt = Equity or net worth Page 25

59 Start of Farm Financial crisis
Low commodity prices High interest rates Assets Equity or net worth Liabilities or debt Page 25

60 Duration of Farm Financial crisis
Assets Equity or net worth Liabilities or debt Page 25

61 Marketing Bill Marketing Bill: The portion of food expenditures associated with activities of firms beyond the farm gate More than 80% of every dollar spend on food is represented by the marketing bill For every $100 spent at the supermarket… The farm service sector accounts for about $12. The production sector (i.e., farmers), about $7. The remaining $81 goes to processors of agricultural commodities, and the marketing system that brings food to your table Pages 27-29

62 Where a food dollar goes
Only 19 percent of each dollar spent on food products goes to farmers and ranchers… Page 32

63 % of Food Purchase Dollar Returned to the Farm
Farm Value % Trend Line: Explains 92% of variability The % allocation across categories has remained relatively constant

64 % of Food Purchase Dollar Returned to the Farm

65 In Summary Increasing role of capital Productivity
Weak real profitability Interrelationship among sectors in the food and fiber industry Farmers/ranchers share of food dollar

66 Chapter 3 starts a series of three chapters that focus on the demand curve for food and fiber products….


Download ppt "The U.S. Food and Fiber Industry"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google