1. Tillamook County, OR Flood Study Board of Commissioners’ meeting June 23, 2010

2. AgendaAgenda National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) Map Modernization Program Tillamook County Flood Insurance Study (FIS) Review Map Adoption Process

3. Purpose of the NFIP Maps the flood risk and assign insurance rates (FIRMs) Makes flood insurance available Sets minimum floodplain construction standards Reduces dependency on structural flood control Promotes floodplain management practices Reduce economic loss caused by flood events

4. NFIP Facts 5.6 million flood insurance policies 20,532 participating communities $1.2 trillion in flood coverage Nationally...

5. How the NFIP Works Three disciplines of the NFIP: Mapping – Flood Studies Regulations Insurance

6. Flood Studies FIS creates maps that show Special Flood Hazard Areas (SFHA); base (100-yr) floodplain FIS sets flood insurance rates per the maps Lenders must require flood insurance in the 100-year floodplain for Federal-related loans FIS provides communities with data to enforce their ordinances Study Report: Describes flood history, principal flood problems, flood protection measures, hydrology and hydraulic methods, floodway data tables, water surface profiles Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM): Shows floodplain limits, base flood elevations (BFEs), floodways, surveyed cross sections, corporate limits, roads, insurance zones

7. Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRM) Who uses the FIRM? Local Jurisdictions - Community Officials - Building and Zoning Departments - Economic Development - Planners - Emergency Managers Lending Institutions Surveyors & Engineers Builders/Developers Insurance Agents Property Owners State and Federal Agencies

8. When Will it Flood? Flood Frequency % chance over Years Chance in any Year 30 yr mortgage 10 10 out of 100 96% 502 out of 100 46% 100 1 out of 100 26% 500.2 out of 100 6%

9. Base Flood A flood that has a 1% chance of being equaled or exceeded in any given year. Base Flood Elevation (BFE) - the elevation that the base flood is expected to reach. Base Flood = 100-year flood

10. What is Map Modernization? Through Map Modernization… …FEMA will provide digital flood insurance rate maps and studies… …for communities nationwide… …that are more accurate, easier to use, and more readily available.

11. Why Modernize? Outdated maps (10+ years old) Physical changes in floodplains – man-made and natural Digital format enables overlays/analysis Easier to update maps Maps are foundation for flood risk reduction and insurance (5.6 million policies, 1.2 trillion coverage) 200520072009

12. Tillamook County Flood Study Details Contractors: WEST Consultants, Inc., & Michael Baker Jr., Inc. FEMA Funds: $520,000

13. Tillamook County Preliminary FIS: December 31, 2009 Pre-Scoping Report – January 2006 Establish Community Contacts, Retrieve Data (models, LOMRs, needs), Level of Study, Available Base Map Data Scoping Meeting – March 11, 2006 Discuss proposed scope of work, identify available data and update needs, 14 Attendees (FEMA, County, Cities of Tillamook and Garibaldi, State, USACE, WEST) Large Flood Event – November 6, 2006 – Wilson River near Tillamook - 38,600 cfs vs FIS 100-year – 36,300 cfs Large Flood Event – December 3, 2007– Wilson River near Tillamook – 33,100 cfs History

14. Scope of Work Re-assess hydrology If not within tolerance, evaluate effects on the BFE Re-delineate floodplain extents along reaches where we obtained newer topography and aerial photos Refine floodplain boundaries Digitally convert effective FIRMS –All effective panels, except for detailed re-study of Miami, Kilchis, Wilson, Trask and Tillamook Rivers

15. Hydrologic Assessment Wilson/Trask/Tillamook hydrology modified because of large floods in 2007 and 2008 Kilchis hydrology unchanged (within 2% of effective) Miami 100-year hydrology increased from 6,600 cfs to 9,550 cfs based on flood frequency analysis

16. Hydrologic Assessment Location Drainage Area (square miles) Frequency 2008 FFA Computed Discharge (cfs) 2002 FIS Discharge (cfs) Discharge Confidence Limits 25- percent 75- percent Gage 14301500 Wilson River near Tillamook, OR through 2008 161.0 10-Year28,50029,70027,40025,000 50-Year37,60039,70035,80033,000 100-Year 41,400 43,90039,300 36,300 500-Year50,20053,80047,20043,500 Trask River 100-year Flow went from 27,400 to 33,500 CFS

17. FloodwayFloodway Area where water velocities and depths are the most destructive Defined as the channel of a river or other watercourse and the adjacent land areas that must be reserved in order to discharge the base flood without cumulatively increasing the water surface elevation more than a designated height (1 foot).

18. FLOODWAY SCHEMATIC 100 YEAR FLOODPLAIN SURCHARGE FLOODWAY FLOODWAY + FLOODWAY FRINGE = 100 YEAR FLOODPLAIN SURCHARGE NOT TO EXCEED 1.0 FEET

19. Hydraulic Model Based on Corps flood reduction model (2004) –Cross sections from a variety of sources (County, previous FEMA, and Corps surveys) –Sections extended the overbanks using 2-ft topo from late 1999 –Calibrated to events in Nov. 1999, May 2001 and Nov. 2001 Some modifications to: –Expand the sections to contain the 0.2% flood –Fix split flow in SW part of model

20. Floodway Development Lower Trask River and Tillamook River did not have defined floodways Wilson River floodway needed updating to new hydrology and hydraulics Initially “adopted” effective floodways –Worked for upper Wilson and Trask, but not downstream Floodplain and floodway mapped to 2-ft contours

21. DFIRM Conversion Reaches Detailed Study – Approximately 80 miles Distance (mi) Nehalem Bay 4.0 Nestucca Bay3.7 Nehalem River15.1 NF Nehalem River5.2 Nestucca River16.0 Three Rivers4.9 Wilson River4.3 Pacific Ocean28.4 DFIRM Conversion of 28 FIRM and 7 FBFM Panels

22. New maps are county-wide Follows a USGS Quad layout – countywide coverage with no city “cut-outs” Contains 100- & 500-year floodplains (AE/X zones) 10, 50, 100, 500 year flood elevations published Re-delineation of flooding sources where better topography was available Vertical Datum change (NGVD 1929 to NAVD 1988) What’s new Flood Insurance Study

23. What’s new Vertical Datum Change NGVD 29 –Based on a mean sea level from 21 tidal stations in the US & 5 stations in Canada NAVD 88 –Based on the density of the Earth instead of varying values of sea heights –More accurate Conversion for Tillamook County Varies –NGVD + (vertical adjustment’) = NAVD –Conversion factor for County for FIS is 3.54 feet

24. Digital Flood Insurance Rate Maps Vertical Datum and FIRMs (e.g. uses 3.54’ conversion) NGVD 29NAVD 88 BFE = 5.54 ft BFE = 2 ft 15 0 5 10 0 15 10 5

25. Digital Flood Insurance Rate Maps Digital Format Aerial Imagery Elevation Geodetic Control Boundaries Surface Waters Transportation Land Ownership Special Flood Hazard Areas

28. Apply local parcel and topo layers… Digital Flood Insurance Rate Maps

29. Zone Designation Changes Old FIRMsNew FIRMsDefinition AAApproximate Floodplain (SFHA) A1- A30AEDetail River Floodplain (SFHA) A99 Protected by Levee AH Shallow Floodplain with BFE AO Shallow FP without BFE BX (shaded)500 Year Floodplain CX (un-shaded)Outside 500 Year Floodplain DDUndetermined Floodplain VVApprox Coastal Floodplain V1-30VEDetailed Coastal Floodplain

30. AE Zone X Zone (shaded) Floodway Digital Flood Insurance Rate Maps FIRM Labels

31. Digital Flood Insurance Rate Maps Some new labels on dFIRMs look like this… X (Un-shaded ) X (Shaded) (500-year) Floodway A & AE Zones SFHA (100-year)

32. Tillamook County Adoption Process

33. Post PreLiminary Processing Post PreLiminary Processing Timeline of events Preliminary maps issued ………......... Hold Coordination Meeting ……........ Public Meeting ……………………................................. 90 day appeal period begins ……... after 2 nd public notice in local newspaper 90-day appeal period ends ……......... FEMA reviews submitted technical appeals and modifies or maintains maps as appropriate FEMA issues “Letter of Final Determination (LFD)” ………………………... to communities and publishes the BFEs in the Federal Register Communities have 6 months to adopt the study before the data becomes “effective”. Failure to adopt results in suspension from NFIP Effective date ……………………………............ December 31, 2009 March 31, 2010 May 12, 2010 e.g. June 15, 2010 e.g. September 15, 2010 Est. December, 2010 Est. June, 2011

34. AppealsAppeals 44 CFR 67.6A – The sole basis of appeal under this part shall be the possession of knowledge or information indicating that the elevations proposed by FEMA are scientifically or technically incorrect. Because scientific and technical correctness is often a matter of degree rather than absolute (except where mathematical or measurement error or changed physical conditions can be demonstrated), appellants are required to demonstrate that alternative methods or applications result in more correct estimates of base flood elevations, thus demonstrating that FEMA's estimates are incorrect.

35. AppealsAppeals Signed Letter with Backup Technical Information Mail to: STARR - Region X Support Center 901 Fifth Avenue, Suite 3100 Seattle, WA 98164 Informal Comments not needing a response: Email: RSC10@STARR-team.comRSC10@STARR-team.com Questions: Phone: 206-682-1159 ext. 2225

36. CommentsComments #1– Floodway crosses across school despite the entire area uniformly being raised 10 feet above river bank. Can the floodway be adjusted to not include school since it looks like it would either convey over the entire area or not at all? Backup Documentation – Zoomed in map of area, address topography #2 – Area has flooded numerous times in the past. Why is it mapped as dry? Backup Documentation – Zoomed in map of area, address, photos, topography

37. Comments Not Able to Address #1 - My house has never flooded in xx number of years, why am I being shown wet? Problem – The 100-year flood is generally larger than recent floods. We need technical information that shows the calculations are incorrect (flow, stage, topography) #2 - There is newer topography since you started the study. Please redo study to newer topography. Problem – Too expensive and time-consuming and would never be able to complete a study. Not a valid appeal by definition.

38. Letters of Map Change (LOMC) (ways to appeal at any time) LOMA - for property owners who believe a property was incorrectly included in a SFHA. An elevation certificate supports a LOMA, but by itself, does not remove the insurance requirement. LOMR – removes land that has been graded or filled (physical changes) since the date of the map. A LOMR can waive flood insurance requirements. (LOMA) Hotline - 1-877-FEMA-MAP

39. Future Steps after Appeal period ends FEMA addresses submitted comments Local jurisdictions adopt an ordinance that is compliant with your map and FEMA standards Local jurisdictions develop and implement outreach strategies, if desired. Upon receipt of LFD, local jurisdictions begin enforcing the maps

40. Letter of Final Determination (LFD) Letter of Final Determination (LFD) Starts with the Letter of Final Determination (LFD) stating that the Appeals have been resolved, if applicable Officially notifies community of final base flood elevations Indicates effective date of FIRMs as 6 months from the date of the letter Ordinance meeting FEMA regulations MUST become effective by end of 6 months or community will be suspended