1. A NEW APPROACH TO ASSET THE VALUE OF “BUILDING CONTROL”…

2. Scope of the Project Objectives of the Project: – Give a better understanding to CEBC members of the involvement of the stakeholders in the risk management process (RMP) and the efficiency of systems in every country in Europe – Help CEBC to develop policy and strategic decisions (field of BC, and so on) Deliverables: – Figures of involvement in RMP – Key Performance Indicator of RM systems – Suggestions of strategic and tactical decision to CEBC Base line expectation : Complete by end 2015 Project manager : L.Peinaud

3. Project specifications Phase 1 : – Set information about risk management process (RMP) for different countries – Kick off : June 2014 / To be complete by: February 2015 Phase 2 – Set Key Performance Indicator for RM system and for different countries – Kick off : November 2014 /To be complete by April 2015 Phase 3 – Compare KPI and RMP model, analyze the key factor and make suggestion to CEBC policy committee – Kick off : November April 2015 /To be complete by October 2015

4. PHASE ONE - ASSESSMENT

5. PHASE 1-1 SET A MODEL Global presentation

6. Phase one 1/2 What have we done ? The first step was to define an easy and understandable model. A model has been settled and tested by a group of CEBC members (UK Scotland and England, Norway, Cyprus, Belgium, Germany and France) from June 2014 to September 2014 and the result is a 3D CEBC model.

7. The test shows that the main improvement consist to improve the: - Definition of the type of building to be studied - Team approach rather than individual to asset the involvement - Preliminary explanation of the risk management process - Definition of the type of risk concerned - Definition of stakeholders Phase one 2/2

8. 3D CEBC model The 3 axis of the model are : – Activities of the RMP (according to ISO 31000) – Stakeholders – Involvement of stakeholders per activity Stakeholder Process of risk management Asset of involvement Different kind of building – One or two storey residential building – Multi storey residential building – Retail or industrial building – Project over 100.000.000 euros

9. PHASE 1-1 SET A MODEL RMP and assessment of involvement

10. Activities of the RMP The activities are : – To define the risk criteria – To analyse the risk (risk assessment) – To choose a strategy according to the risk analysis – To implementi actions in accordance with the strategy – To monitor the actions planed – To manage the process

11. Risk criteria For each stakeholder and for each kind of project 1234 Does the stakeholder concerned define the risk criteria? For more than 60% of the projects For more than 30% of the projects For more than 10% of the project For less than 10% of the project Does the stake holder concerned is involved in the definition of risk criteria ? For more than 60% of the projects For more than 30% of the projects For more than 10% of the project For less than 10% of the project

12. Risk assessment For each stakeholder and for each kind of project 1234 Does the stakeholder concerned organise and manage the risk assessment? For more than 60% of the projects For more than 30% of the projects For more than 10% of the project For less than 10% of the project Does the stake holder concerned participate in the risk assessment ? For more than 60% of the projects For more than 30% of the projects For more than 10% of the project For less than 10% of the project Does the stakeholder ….

13. Strategy after risk assessment For each stakeholder and for each kind of project 1234 Does the stakeholder concerned decide the strategy? For more than 60% of the projects For more than 30% of the projects For more than 10% of the project For less than 10% of the project Does the stake holder concerned support the analysis prior the decision? For more than 60% of the projects For more than 30% of the projects For more than 10% of the project For less than 10% of the project

14. Implementing actions in accordance with strategy For each stakeholder and for each kind of project 1234 Does the stakeholder concerned design the actions to be implemented? For more than 60% of the projects For more than 30% of the projects For more than 10% of the project For less than 10% of the project Does the stake holder concerned implement the actions ? For more than 60% of the projects For more than 30% of the projects For more than 10% of the project For less than 10% of the project Does the stake holder concerned check the actions planed ? For more than 60% of the projects For more than 30% of the projects For more than 10% of the project For less than 10% of the project

15. Monitoring actions planed by independent party For each stakeholder and for each kind of project 1234 Does the stakeholder concerned check the actions planned in term of effectiveness? For more than 60% of the projects For more than 30% of the projects For more than 10% of the project For less than 10% of the project Does the stakeholder concerned check the actions planned in term of efficiency ? For more than 60% of the projects For more than 30% of the projects For more than 10% of the project For less than 10% of the project

16. Managing the process For each stakeholder and for each kind of project 1234 Does the stakeholder concerned organise and manage the risk criteria definition? For more than 60% of the projects For more than 30% of the projects For more than 10% of the project For less than 10% of the project Does the stakeholder concerned organise and manage the risk assessment? For more than 60% of the projects For more than 30% of the projects For more than 10% of the project For less than 10% of the project Does the stakeholder concerned record the data of the RMP ? For more than 60% of the projects For more than 30% of the projects For more than 10% of the project For less than 10% of the project Does the stakeholder concerned prepare and share the review of the process For more than 60% of the projects For more than 30% of the projects For more than 10% of the project For less than 10% of the project

17. PHASE 1-1 SET A MODEL Stakeholder

18. Client - Owner

19. Design team

20. Contractor, builder

21. Material production industries (MPI)

22. Administration (central and local)

23. PHASE 1-1 Example

24. Example of 3D model

25. Example of comparative assessment

26. PHASE 1-2 DATA COLLECTION

27. "With A Little Help From My Friends »

28. PHASE TWO – KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATOR

29. Preliminary Analysis of previous case studies. One particular survey has been made for EC in 2006 by BWA (Benchmarking of Construction Costs in the Member States) and been recommended by Mr Paparella. After a short talk, we agree that the model was good but inefficient because data required are not available.

30. What do we need ? The project team needs. We must find some case study more operational such as the cost of non quality for a project or for different type of projects. It is important to collect previous case studies that you have heard or been involved in! Let us know…and be involved! Another axis should be to ask IFC to support the project and more generally to develop the supporting network. We need you for that.