Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byHenry Williams Modified over 9 years ago
1
On effects of stage of lactation and subclinical mastitis on milk quality in goats
2
Nissim Silanikove Biology of Lactation Lab, Agricultural Research Organization, The Volcani Center, Israel Uzi Merin Department of Food Science, Agricultural Research Organization, The Volcani Center, Israel Gabriel Leitner Kimron Veterinary Institute, Israel
3
Milk quality: fat, total proteins, casein, curd and are affected by intramammary Infection and stage of lactation Cheese quality: yield, structure, smell, flavor, shelf life and all these factors are subjected to the effect of intramammary Infection and stage of lactation
4
Traditional farming 1.Along the lactation different products are produced 2. Milk from clinically infected glands is discarded Modern dairy forming 1.Animals are milked while at different stages of lactation 2. A large number of glands are infected with a variety of bacteria
5
Animal model built on the gland level One udder-half identified with CNS species and the contra-lateral being free of bacteria + - S. caprae S. chromogenes S. epidermidis S. simulans S. xylosus
6
+ -
7
Milk yield (half) of sheep or goat infected with CNS specie in one gland and the contra-lateral being free. Open bars – S; Hatched bars – G
8
1 2 3 Curd firmness (volts) Clotting time (sec) Cork 2005
9
Curd yield and clotting time of goat milk from infected vs. uninfected udder-halves Uninfected Infected
10
0.5 3.5 Milk K/day Day in milk SCC (1000) 1000 100 Milk yield and SCC along the lactation of uninfected glands
11
0.5 3.5 Milk (K/day) Days in milk SCC (x 1000) 1000 100 Milk yield and SCC along the lactation of infected glands
12
ParameterMLG-F b MLG-I b b LLG b b R2R2 P [F] DIM129 ± 15.9 b 121 ± 6.3 b 269 ± 4.8 a 0.476<0.001 Milk (L d −1 )3.07 ± 0.2 a 2.64 ± 0.16 b 0.80 ± 0.2 c 0.542<0.001 SCC (×1000)292 ± 46 c 2861 ± 642 b 6274 ± 710 a 0.253<0.001 Fat (g L −1 )33.2 ± 2.4 b 36.0 ± 1.9 b 50.5 ± 1.9 a 0.303<0.001 Protein (g L −1 )32.0 ± 2.8 b 34.7 ± 2.2 b 56.6 ± 2.2 a 0.380<0.001 Casein (g L −1 )23.1 ± 1.9 b 23.3 ± 1.6 b 40.3 ± 1.5 a 0.423<0.001 %Casein c c 74.16 ± 0.6 a 68.26 ± 0.84 c 70.59 ± 0.80 b 0.157<0.001 Lactose (g L −1 )47.2 ± 0.4 a 44.1 ± 1.0 b 37.0 ± 1.0 c 0.266<0.001 RCT (s)443 ± 50 c 621 ± 30 b 2107 ± 230 a 0.236<0.001 CF-60 (V)8.57 ± 1.91 a 1.26 ± 2.77 b 5.2 ± 1.30 b 0.0940.038 Days in milk (DIM), milk yield, SCC, gross milk composition (fat, protein, casein, lactose), rennet clotting time (RCT) and curd firmness (CF) of goats’ milk for mid-lactation, bacteria-free (MLG-F), mid-lactating, infected (MLG-I), and late-lactation, bacteria-free (LLG) a. a
13
* Many of the animals with subclinical chronic infection are not noted because there are no recognizable symptoms and the milk appearance is normal * End of lactation goats show increased SCC regardless of IMI ** Routine milk testing such as CMT on the animal side or more advanced techniques like the sophisticated cell counters allow the identification of subclinically infected animals close to the occurrence of the infection. However, it is laborious and/or require special equipment to perform *** On-line computerized milking systems are designed in part to overcome these conditions and to apply genuine real-time data acquisition on individual animals, including milk yield and conductivity
14
Healthy gland ~ 50,000 Cows ~ 300,000 goats and sheep Infected gland ~ 3,000,000 CASEINOLYSIS INDEX Cell depended Bacteria and Cells depended
15
Low quality curd Curd firmness (Cf) correlation ( r= -0.4( Log SCC and Cf of curd of goat milk at mid lactation with and without IMI and at the end of lactation without IMI- SCC is not the best predicting variable for milk quality Log SCC
16
Clotting time and curd firmness Curd firmness (V) Clotting time (sec) Bacteria 6.58±0.2 650±63 NBF 1.02±0.3 2490±340 Strep. 3.80±0.8 1255±468 CNS E. coli 3.28±0.7 1078±193 S. aureus
18
Strep. dysgalactiae Staph. chromogenes Healthy Infected
19
Correlations and respective probability (P[r]) for cows, goats, and ) sheep between levels of protein, casein, (protein + fat), % casein and lactose, SCC, and log SCC, and curd firmness (CF) of milk: ∗ – P > 0.001; ∗∗ – P > 0.05; NS – not significant
20
Low quality curd % Lactose Lactose lower than 4% % lactose and Cf of curd of goat milk at mid lactation with and without IMI and at the end of lactation without IMI Curd firmness (Cf)
21
Influence of percent lactose in milk on curd firmness as measured by the Optigraph
22
* It was found that lactose content in milk is the best indicator for milk quality for cheese making. * It is already implemented in Afilab (Kibutz Afikim, Israel) On- line FTIR-based recording system in dairy cows milking parlors The system enables to separate on-line milk unfit for cheese making from milk suitable for cheese on the pipe-line between the milking parlor and the tank during milking and store them in separate tanks * Feasibility test of the system for small ruminants was conducted The system will enable direct and cheap daily identification of animals with milk unsuitable for cheese making and perhaps to separate it as already done with cows
23
PL activity, units/mL Plasmin activity: sheep or goat with one gland infected with CNS specie and the contra-lateral being free Sheep + 195%, P < 0.0003 Goat + 73%, P < 0.0007
24
SDS PAGE Tricine 0% 50% 100% 52 35 28 21 14
25
PreparationHealthy (10) S. chromoge nes (4) E. coli (7) Str. dysgalactiae (5) p–p160 ± 50180 ± 70360 ± 40320 ± 60 FE7.2 ± 1.28.4 ± 1.423 ± 2.027.3 ± 2.2 % FE of p–p4.54.46.38.4 Amounts of p–p and FE obtained from milk samples. Numbers in parenthesis indicate the number of glands tested. Proteose peptone determined using the Bradford (1976) method,Bradford (1976) FE estimated as the area under the OD 280 values of the FPLC chromatogram; values are given as mean and SD in mg L −1.
26
Dose–response effect of the addition of fraction E (FE) from milk obtained from healthy glands (open bars) and from Str. dysgalactiae-infected glands (hatched bars) to milk from healthy glands on rennet clotting time and curd firmness, as assessed using the Optigraph.
27
The effect of addition of up to 5 mg fraction E (FE) to 10 mL of milk obtained from healthy or Str. dysgalactiae-infected glands, in the presence of calcium ions, to milk from healthy glands, on rennet clotting time (RCT) and curd firmness (CF), as assessed using the Optigraph.
28
Anti-Lactogenic hormones e.g., Cortisol, Estrogen Lactogenic hormones e.g., GH, Prolactin alveoli PA PL PLG Frequent milking or suckling Reaction type 1 Reaction type 2 1 2 Blood Lumen External effects: Milking, suckling, bacterial invasion Milk stasis or bacterial invasion
29
Cork 2005 Bacterial infection Cellular response Cytokines, SCC (PMN) Plasmin SCC = somatic cell count PMN = polymorphonuclear Caseinolysis Oxidatiive response by NO-derived NO 2 radical Lipid oxidation Activation of the innate system Protein oxidation SCC is a good reference for milk quality if we compare good quality (300000 cell/ml) with low quality one (1 million cells and above). Milk for cheese production and caseinolysis are bacteria species-dependent and are poorly predicted by SCC
30
Bacteriological status Carotene destruction, nMsec -1 FRAP, Ascorbic acid, µM Ntyr, nMg -1 Lpx, mEqv g- 1 Non-infected669 +121 a 413 + 27 a 143 + 11 a 110 + 471.3 +0.3 a Infected with coagulase-negative staphylococci 2006 + 215 b 305 36 b 91 + 7 b 170 + 412.8 + b Effect of subclinical mastitis on oxidative, antioxidative and formation of oxidized substance in milk
32
subclinical mastitis is associated with significant losses in milk yield and quality for cheese production. Milk of subclinically infected glands is subjected to considerable NO-derived oxidative stress, which only moderately impose nitrosative stress on milk proteins. However, it is associated with significant loss of milk antioxidant capacity and vitamin C levels, which are particularly high in goats. Thus, it is concluded that subclinical mastitis induces unfavorable changes in milk quantity and composition, which affects considerably both to the farmers and the dairy sector that depend on goat’s milk.
33
Thanks, on behalf of the heroes !
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.