Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byBernadette Chandler Modified over 9 years ago
1
2025: 20% doctor included? an exercise in technology speculation & musings vinod khosla vk@khoslaventures.com twitter: @vkhosla
2
10% to 20% of cases: delayed, missed, and incorrect diagnosis graber, et al., jama, 2005 2
3
40,000+ patients in u.s. icus may die with a misdiagnosis annually winters, et al., bmj quality & safety, 2012 3
4
50% of MDs are below-average math 4
5
human doctors cognitive limitations cognitive biases 5
6
a study of one hundred cases of diagnostic error involving internists found… Article: http://archinte.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleid=486642 6
7
…system-related factors contributed to the diagnostic error in 65% of the cases and cognitive factors in 74%... Article: http://archinte.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleid=486642 7
8
…premature closure was the single most common cause Article: http://archinte.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleid=486642 8
9
the value of second opinions Source: http://www.businessinsurance.com/article/20111204/NEWS05/312049987?tags=|74|305|339|342 9 cleveland clinic doctors’ review of initial diagnosis
10
the American College of Cardiology and the American Heart Association made 7,196 recommendations leading to 53 practice guidelines on 22 topics… …48% have level C evidence (the worst kind)… …11% have level A evidence (the best kind)… …and only 19% of recommendations in class I guidelines had level A evidence 10 Source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19244190www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19244190
11
surgeons were given detailed diagnoses & asked if patients should get surgery … half said yes … the other half said no … when asked again two years later, 40% of the docs gave a different answer Source: http://jama.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleid=380215 11
12
four cardiologists were asked to diagnose stenosis in patients using high-quality angiograms … … they disagreed 60% of the time …and disagreed with themselves (on re- reads) 8-37% of the time 12
13
fifty-eight experts’ estimates of the chance of an outcome of an important procedure 0% 0.2% 0.5% 1% 1% 1% 1.5% 1.5% 2% 3% 3% 4% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 6% 6% 6% 8% 10% 10% 10% 10% 13% 13% 15% 15% 18% 20% 20% 20% 25% 25% 25% 30% 30% 40% 50% 50% 50% 62% 70% 73% 75 75% 75% 75% 80% 80% 80% 80% 80% 80% 100% what does a consensus of a group whose perceptions might vary from 0% to 100% even mean? 13
14
wide ranges of uncertainty Source: http://jama.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleid=380215 14 seventeen experts’ estimates of the effect of screening on colon cancer deaths 0%25%50%75%100% proportion of colon cancer deaths prevented = one expert’s response
15
conventional wisdom and the “tradition of medicine” Source: http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20727711.400-fever-friend-or-foe.html 15 should fever be reduced in critically ill patients? “there were seven deaths in people getting standard treatment and only one in those allowed to have fever” “the team felt compelled to call a halt, feeling it would be unethical to allow any more patients to get standard treatment”
16
nearly half of all american adults have difficulty understanding and acting upon health information institute of medicine of the national academies, 2004 http://www.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=10883&page=1 16
17
there is good reason to challenge the assumption that every individual practitioner's decision is necessarily correct eddy, et al., jama, 1990 17
18
for most study designs and settings, it is more likely for a research claim to be false than true ioannidis, plos med, 2005 18
19
inescapable conflicts of interest… …most physicians are motivated to deliver quality care… …but the typical physician response also includes a desire to protect high salaries… http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702303983904579093252573814132.html19
20
entrepreneurs will ask the naïve questions that uncover hidden assumptions… …and move us to the grey zone of “speculations” 20
21
in the future, patients will have the data & analysis to become the CEO of your own health peter diamandis 21
22
80% of what MDs do can be replaced (with better care than the average MD)… …but not every MD function will be replaced 22
23
the “human” element of care can be provided by the most “humane” humans (and MDs can be humane) 23
24
machines are better at integrative medicine… …across “all symptoms”, demeanor, patient history, phone activity, 1000s of data points, genomics, population management guidelines, … …and machines won’t have to win every time… …they’ll just be better overall 24
25
Lifecom CHAMP in acute care I …distributed care with medical assistants were 91% accurate without labs, imaging, or exams II …“safe triage” with 75% physician bypass rate for acute care encounters 25
26
isabel II matched expert diagnoses 91-95% of the time 26
27
dr. algorithm v0 27
28
the transition will start with “toddler MDs” and digital first-aid kits 28
29
29 Cellscope: ENT+ derm images… Adamant: breath analysis Eyenetra: auto-optometrist Ginger.io: mental health Alivecor: frequent EKG+ analysis Quanttus: physiological metrics (HR, BP, SV, CO, RR, T, …) Medgle: graph of medicine Healthtap, Crowdmed: crowdsourced answers Kyron: practice based evidence Jawbone, Misfit: wellness wearables
30
don’t wait days to take your daughter to the hospital… …check her ear infection as soon as it hurts 30 *a khosla ventures investment CellScope
31
don’t go to the hospital and get connected to a bunch of electrodes… …take your own ecg for less than a buck… …and know you have heart disease before you have an attack! 31 *a khosla ventures investment AliveCor
32
don’t go to the optometrist… …get measured for glasses at home 32 *a khosla ventures investment EyeNetra
33
don’t guess what’s going on inside your body… …get vital intelligence 33 *a khosla ventures investment Quanttus
34
don’t wait for an asthma attack… …know when it’s coming 34 *a khosla ventures investment Adamant
35
forget kappas of 0.2 in the DSM-5… …get reliable, consistent diagnoses 35 *a khosla ventures investment Ginger.io
36
graph the world of medicine… …and see where you fit 36 *a khosla ventures investment MEDgle
37
evidence-based medicine isn’t enough… …think practice-based evidence 37 *a khosla ventures investment Kyron … use data-mining to learn ethnicity-specific drug interactions (e.g. statins work differently in Indians)
38
thousands of physicians… …no waiting room 38 *a khosla ventures investment HealthTap
39
...and your innovation here (call us) 39
40
healthcare service stations & digital first aid kits 40
41
keep people out of the doctor’s office… …with point innovations in cardiology, dermatology, optometry, psychiatry, internal medicine, … 41
42
innocuous point innovations… 42 …will evolve into a wave and explode into a tsunami
43
dr. algorithm v0 v1 – 2015 v2 – 2017 v3 – 2019 v4 – 2021 v5 – 2023 v6 – 2025 … 43
44
we’ll start with clumsy point innovations like alivecor, cellscope, adamant, ginger.io, neurotrek, consumer physics, jawbone, misfit, … …“insighted” by machine learning… …leading us to discover things we never knew were right in front of us 44
45
the best MDs will train systems over 10 years… …systems will symbiotically provide “bionic assist” and “AMPLIFY” MDs 45
46
dr. house+++ will be the trainer for dr. algorithm …no manners required! …but manners learned! 46
47
findings thanks to data using statins for in-hospital stroke patients reduced the death rate by 40%! kaiser permanente47
48
48 the practice of medicine the science of medicine
49
I will be wrong on the specifics but directionally right 49
50
the shift to “computerization” has already happened in other areas… …airline pilots, stock trading, car driving 50
51
there aren’t enough rural doctors in india and few have access to jama journals, mris, … …the world of medicine is under-resourced globally 51
52
20% doctor included? vinod khosla vk@khoslaventures.com twitter: @vkhosla 52
53
53
54
in many records of patients with a high-risk diagnosis, high-information clinical findings were present before the diagnosis was established feldman, et al., jamia 54
55
90M adults with limited health literacy cannot fully benefit from much that the healthcare system has to offer institute of medicine of the national academies 55
56
better data for post-study studies overcome ioannidis’ problem of regressions to the mean 56
57
smart computers can be objective cost minimizers… …while being care optimizers 57
58
the problem is not MDs… …they have served us well in the “practice of medicine”… …but humans are not good at the integrative “science of medicine”… …or the misalignment of incentives 58
59
would a hospital cure you in half the time… …if it meant cutting their business in half? 59
60
would big pharma give you a better drug… …if it meant losing subscription revenue? 60
61
would most psychiatrists cure you… …if it meant cutting off the recurring revenue visits? 61
62
would a medical device manufacturer sell you a less- expensive sensor… …if it meant cannibalizing sales of the really expensive equipment? 62
63
findings thanks to data depression is a risk factor for diabetes 63
64
devices analytics data improved patient outcomes at lower cost architecting healthcare 64
65
social and technological forces are conspiring to make the traditional role of the doctor irrelevant bryan vartabedian (attending, texas children's hospital) 65
66
baseline systems models of patients 66
67
computerized dialog managers 67
68
innovation starts at the fringes 68
69
hundreds of “experts” … 28,000+ forecasts over 20+ years results: “experts” are poorer forecasters than dart-throwing monkeys the folly of experts: tetlock study 69
70
don’t prescribe pills … … prescribe apps 70
71
adverse drug events increase hospital costs by >$3000 per stay… …and billions (estimates range from 110 - 180 B) in annual spending nationwide 71
72
in a study of 3 hospitals, 40% of adverse events were medication-related 72
73
the cost of drug-related morbidity and mortality exceeded $177.4 billion in 2000. 73
74
nearly half of all american adults have difficulty understanding and acting upon health information institute of medicine of the national academies 74
75
most [patients] preferred receiving their discharge information from the [computer] agent compared to their doctors or nurses in the hospital bickmore, et al., interacting with computers 75
76
virtually all of the current quality assurance and cost-containment mechanisms assume that there is "accuracy in numbers." why should we assume that the physician offering the second opinion knows the correct answer? what does a consensus of a group whose perceptions might vary from 0% to 100% even mean? eddy, et al., jama, 1990 76
77
physicians are in the impossible position of not knowing the outcomes of different actions, but having to act anyway eddy, et al., jama, 1990 77
78
while there are ineffective and unnecessary practices, the real questions pertain to which treatments work best and whether the costs and risks of more risky and expensive practices are matched by proportionate benefits eddy, et al., jama, 1990 78
79
don’t just smile and nod… …hear what your “doc” is telling you 79 *a khosla ventures investment Gamgee
80
get the answers to questions… …you never knew to ask 80 *a khosla ventures investment Ayasdi
81
get second opinions… …from everyone 81 *a khosla ventures investment CrowdMed
82
track your life… …all from your wrist 82 *a khosla ventures investment Jawbone
83
track your life… …with a fashion statement 83 *a khosla ventures investment Misfit
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.