Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byBeverly McCoy Modified over 9 years ago
1
Development and Implementation of STD Treatment Verification Program in San Francisco L. Fischer, C.K. Kent, J.D. Klausner
2
Acknowledgements SFDPH-STD Prevention and Control Screening and Surveillance Services Sharon Byrd, Health Worker III Yvette Castillo, Health Worker II Robert Kohn MPH, Epidemiologist Tony Tran, Health Worker II
3
Gonorrhea (GC) and Chlamydia (CT) Treatment Reporting Rationale: –Assure appropriate treatment & that treatment occurs San Francisco DPH Challenge: –Find most effective method to get treatment reports State of CA requires treatment reporting on all Confidential Morbidity Reports (CMR): –During 2001, only 1% of all providers reported treatment on CMR, 2% by fax or phone
4
Objective Develop treatment verification program Implement provider reporting utilizing existing staff Evaluate success or barriers to treatment reporting by SF providers
5
Data Reporting Sources Year 2001-2003 reported morbidity Provider Types: 40 SFDPH screening sites 15 County hospital based clinics (SFGH) 70 private and large volume providers Examined GC & CT reported treatment by provider types
6
Questions 1.How complete is provider reporting? 2.What are the provider barriers to reporting? 3.How can we increase treatment reporting with existing staff? 4.How can we help providers improve reporting?
7
Provider Needs Provider Barriers to Reporting: Survey Findings: –Importance –Lack of Staff –Disseminated providers –Lack of understanding reporting requirements
8
STD Prevention and Control Staff Needs Assessment of existing responsibilities What can be streamlined? Duties of existing 3 Health Workers (HW): –4 STD/HIV clinic counseling shifts each per week –Phone results coverage four times per week –Identifying need for field investigations –ICCR/Screening desk coverage –PEP and HIV/PCRS Case Management –Active STD Surveillance and medical records search
9
Staff Training 1.Develop computer program to identify incomplete reports needing follow up 2.Review CMR with staff 3.Develop written polices for staff follow-up including specific time frames 4.Role-Play requests to providers to build confidence in Health Workers 5.Weekly and consistent review of successes and/or barriers
10
Provider Training Letter to all Providers from STD Controller Mass Mailings of: –CA Health and Safety Code reporting requirements –CDC, LHD Treatment Guidelines –Copy of CMR One-One meetings with problem reporters
11
Treatment Reporting Results 2001 – 3% of all providers reported treatment 2002 treatment reporting: –Screening sites: 95% (3295/3462) –SFGH clinics: 25% (99/301) –Private clinics/providers:31% (460/1021) 2003 treatment reporting: –Screening sites: 97% (3553/3674) –SFGH clinics: 58% (255/437) –Private clinics/providers:67% (1009/1497)
12
Conclusions Reorganizing existing staff duties with little disruption to clinic services Commitment of time, effort and consistency for training staff and providers Adopt and maintain a Can-Do attitude with staff and providers
13
Contact Information Address: STD Prevention and Control Services 356 7 th Street San Francisco, CA 94103 Lyn.Fischer@SFDPH.org (415) 487-5518
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.