1. Open Access to Scholarly Communications Open Access Scholarly Communication Workshop Vilnius, Lithuania February 2005

2. Overview of presentation  Introduction to Open Access  Open Access Journals  Institutional Repositories  Support of Open Access

3. Definition of open access In using the term 'open access‘, we mean the free availability of peer-reviewed literature on the public internet, permitting any user to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles.

4. Driving force behind open access – Dissatisfaction at all levels  Authors: their work is not seen by all their peers – do not receive the recognition they desire  Readers: cannot view all research literature they need – less effective  Libraries: cannot satisfy information needs of their users

5. Background of the BOAI December 2001, Budapest: Meeting of leaders exploring alternative publishing models. Concluded that “open access” was the goal and agreed on two main strategies for achieving it: 1. open access journals 2.institutional repositories

6. Open access journals A journal which is freely available online worldwide and does not rely upon the traditional subscription based business model to generate revenue.

7. Open access journals Open access journals employ a combination of new business models, among them: Article processing fee Institutional membership Hybrid model Advertising Sponsorship

8. Business guides for open access journals  Guide to Business Planning for Converting a Subscription-based Journal to Open Access  Guide to Business Planning for Launching a New Open Access Journal  Model Business Plan: A Supplemental Guide for Open Access Journal Developers & Publishers

9. Publishers convert to open access  Oxford University Press Journal of Nucleic Acids, Journal of Botany  National Academy of Sciences Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences  Springer – “Open Choice”* model

10. New open access journals  BMC: over 130 titles covering all areas of biology and medicine  PLoS: $9 million grant to launch new journals: PLoS Biology, PLoS Medicine PLoS Computational Biology, PLoS Genetics, and PLoS Pathogens

11. Directory of Open Access Journals

12. Myth: ‘Open Access encourages low quality’ “If you are receiving potential payment for every article submitted there is an inherent conflict of interest that could threaten the quality of the peer review system” Oral evidence to UK S&T Inquiry, March 1st 2004, Crispin Davis (CEO, Reed Elsevier)

13. Myth: ‘Open Access encourages low quality’ Journals are made by their reputation – if they get a reputation of accepting low-quality papers then authors will not submit their papers and the journal will not survive. Evidence from ISI is that open access journals do not have lower impact factors than subscription journals, e.g., New Journal of Physics, 3 rd highest IF of all IOP Journals Arthritis Research & Therapy, IF of 5.03 Breast Cancer Research, IF of 2.93, placing it on even footing with its direct competitor, Breast Cancer Research & Treatment, which was established more than 20 years ago. Critical Care, IF of 1.91 (6 th of 16 titles in Critical Care Medicine).

14. Institutional repositories Publicly accessible repository (archive) where all the work published by researchers/authors affiliated with the university/academy can be posted online. Contributes to the status of the institution by displaying the intellectual output of the institution.

15. Institutional repositories All work is deposited in the repository by using interoperable software, which allows the works in the repositories to be searched and harvested. Such software is called Open Archives Initiative (OAI) compliant. Examples of OAI compliant software are DSpace, E-Prints, CDSware, and i-Tor.

16. Institutional repository software

17. Institutional repositories: Copyright policy

18. Institutional repositories Directory of Open Access Repositories – Lund & SHERPA

19. The Power of Open Access – Institutional Repositories  For 72% of papers published in the Astrophysical Journal free versions of the paper are available in repositories (mainly through ArXiv)  These 72% of papers are, on average, cited twice as often as the remaining 28% that do not have free versions available in repositories.

20. Economic Research Access to Science: Exploring New Markets for Digital Journals Professors Mark McCabe & Christopher Snyder Recent article in Nature: “The best business model for scholarly journals: an economist's perspective” http://www.nature.com/nature/focus/accessde bate/28.html

21. Support of Open Access  BOAI, February 2002  Bethesda Statement, April 2003  Berlin Declaration, October 2003 & May 2004  Wellcome Trust, October 2003  UK Parliamentary Inquiry, 2004  U.S. Appropriations Committee, 2004

22. Support of Open Access Howard Hughes Medical Institute: Bethesda statement Funders of biomedical research encourage/support their faculty/grant recipients to publish in open access journals Agree to pay article processing fee

23. Support of Open Access Wellcome Trust (UK) October 2003 Announcement: encourages and supports the formation of open access journals and repositories; funds the article processing fee for Trust researchers.

24. Support of Open Access Max Planck Society: Berlin Declaration on Open Access to Knowledge in the Sciences and Humanities, 22 October 2003, Berlin; 12-13 May 2004, CERN; February 28-March 1, Southampton; October 5-7 2005, Golm (developing country focus) Encourages and supports researchers and grant recipients to publish in open access. Advocates for research published through open access to be recognized in promotion and tenure evaluation.

25. Support of Open Access UK Parliamentary Inquiry: Science and Technology Committee, 2004 Current model of scientific publishing is unsatisfactory – 82 recommendations all UK higher education institutions establish institutional repositories create a fund to help authors pay the article processing fees charged by open-access journals UK Government Response

26. Support of Open Access U.S. Appropriations Committee, 2004 Proposal to mandate all research funded by National Institute of Health be made available through PubMed Central (OA) 6 months after publication in peer-reviewed journal. February 2005 NIH policy announced which “asks” researchers to deposit articles in PMC within 12 months of publication.

27. Open Access: Appealing to major stakeholders  Authors – as it gives wider dissemination and impact of their work  Readers – as it gives them access to all primary literature  Libraries – as it allows them to meet the information needs of their users  Funders of research – increased return on their investment in research  Institutions – as it increases their presence and prestige  Small and society publishers – as it gives them a survival strategy

28. Additional Information

29. Additional information  Budapest Open Access Initiative: http://www.soros.org/openaccess/http://www.soros.org/openaccess/  Directory of Open Access Journals: http://www.doaj.org/http://www.doaj.org/  SPARC: http://www.arl.org/sparchttp://www.arl.org/sparc  Public Library of Science: http://www.publiclibraryofscience.orghttp://www.publiclibraryofscience.org  BioMed Central: http://www.biomedcentral.comhttp://www.biomedcentral.com  Bioline International: http://www.bioline.org.br/http://www.bioline.org.br/  Open Archives Initiative: http://www.openarchives.org/http://www.openarchives.org/  SciX Project: http://www.scix.net/http://www.scix.net/  Project Romeo: http://www.sherpa.ac.uk/romeo.php/http://www.sherpa.ac.uk/romeo.php/  Max Planck Society: http://www.zim.mpg.de/openaccess- berlin/news0321.pdfhttp://www.zim.mpg.de/openaccess- berlin/news0321.pdf  Wellcome Trust: http://www.wellcome.ac.uk/en/1/awtvispolpub.htmlhttp://www.wellcome.ac.uk/en/1/awtvispolpub.html  UK Parliamentary Inquiry Report: http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200304/cmselect/cmsct ech/399/39902.htm http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200304/cmselect/cmsct ech/399/39902.htm

30. Thank you. Melissa Hagemann Program Manager Open Access Program OSI/eIFL.net mhagemann@sorosny.org