1. Aquatic Spectrometer & Turbidity Meter ECE 4007 L1Paul Johnson Daniel Lundy John Reese Asad Hashim

2. Overview  Introduction & Background  Project Description & Goals  Technical Specifications  Design Approach  Schedule  Marketing & Cost Analysis  Current Status

3. Introduction & Background  What is it? A device to detect the colour and clarity of a uniform flowing water sample  How will it work? LEDs, a diffraction grating, a photodetector array and an on-board PC  Why do we need it? Demand from Aqua-culturists and Water Regulation Authorities for a cheap and easy to use device

4. Project Description & Goals

5.  Goals A low selling price of $1499.99 A small overall product size Universal PVC connectors for easy installment Real time measurement capability Ability to autonomously calibrate An output which is easily connected to a PC PC Drivers and software capable of analyzing and recording measurements made by the device

6. Specifications: Turbidity/Photospectography Detection  4-beam continuous ratiometric measurement  50 – 1000 Nephelometric Turbidity Unit (NTU) detection  Diffraction angle detection for color recognition 1 1 2

7. Specifications: Interfacing  10Base-T Ethernet port  Opto-isolated digital I/O embedded communication  Web based remote management 3 4

8. Specifications: Physical  Flanged aluminum enclosure  ¾” Male National Pipe Tapered (NPT) connections  Acrylic sampling tube 5 6

9. Current Products  Turbidity Meters (~$800s - $1000s) Advantages  Cost Less than Spectrometers  Small and Portable Disadvantages  Cannot do color detection on samples  Usually implement detection by use of vials (not real-time analysis) http://www.globalw.com/images/products/tc 3000.jpg

10. Current Products  Mass Spectrometers (~$100,000s) Advantages  High resolution detection of a sample’s color content  Very Accurate and Stable System Disadvantages  Not a real-time analysis  Bulky and Not portable  Very High Cost http://chemistry.gsu.edu/facilities/Q-TOF.jpg

11. Current Products  Mini Spectrometers (~$2000s) Advantages  Cost Effective Solution to Mass Spectrometers  Compact Size  Can be implemented to do real- time analysis Disadvantages  Cost More than Turbidity Meters  Lacks some resolution and accuracy to mass spectrometers http://oceanoptics.com/images/Spectrometers/hr4000 _large.jpg

12. Our Product  Advantages: Real-time analysis Small and Portable Cost effective solution to color spectroscopy and turbidity measurements  Disadvantages Probable Low Resolution

13. Scheduling

14. Marketing & Cost Analysis  Currently available meters are: Expensive Unnecessarily Complicated 7

15. Marketing & Cost Analysis  Development Costs: Parts: $420 Labour: $50,000  Final Price: $1499.99 Includes parts, marketing, overhead, labour, testing and assembly  Expected Revenue: $374,998  Expected Profit: $74,741 (19.9%)

16. Current Status We are currently scavenging scanners, copiers and all manner of electronic devices for linear photo detector arrays. Source: Office Space (1999, 20 th Century Fox)

17. Questions? Source: Office Space (1999, 20 th Century Fox)