1. 1 Wendy Olsen and two teams at the University of Manchester April 2014 www.ccsr.ac.uk www.socialsciences.manchester.ac.uk/essted Enriching Social Science with Quantitative and Survey Data

2. Overview  1. INTRODUCTION  2. SCAFFOLDING vs BRIDGE BUILDING: Methods of scaffolding in general  3. Using ‘embedded quantitative methods’ in sociology  4. EXAMPLES from Sociology

3. Abstract: To meet the need for more use of social data in Sociology and Politics classrooms, we encourage a pedagogy that uses active learning and the building of bridges among a variety of relevant skills. This talk provides a review of what we know so far from our curriculum initiative in this area. Firstly we review the term ‘scaffolding’ which refers to helping students upward in their learning curve (Anghileri, 2006). To uphold scaffolding we need numerous explicit 'learning outcomes' and we need to enable students to practice both orally and in writing. Secondly we argue that bridge-building is also needed - i.e. to embed quantitative data in classrooms ideally combining the theory-critique and analysis skills of a social-science degree with the empirical skills associated with using data. Thirdly we conclude by giving examples of sociology class exercises that have worked well in our project. These relate to the sociology of family life and to attitudes about sexuality. Overall the students' active learning was prompted by the exciting use of spreadsheets and graphs, the introduction of classroom exercises and even 'flipped' classrooms or lectorials, and staff working in teams with diverse specialist knowledge. Wendy Olsen 2014

4. 1. Introduction to ESSTED  PIPS Component: Patterns in Politics & Society Working on Expanding the Enrichment of Social Science Classrooms with Quantitative Data & Quantitative Methods A Researcher Development Initiative of ESRC  CURRICULUM INNOVATION COMPONENT: Ten course units Embedding and enrichment, not substitution Teamwork 4

5. People  Wendy Olsen (Principal Investigator / senior lecturer)  Mark Brown (Principal Investigator / senior teaching fellow)  Jacqui Carter MIMAS and ESDS  Jo Wathan UK Data Service and Census  Jen Buckley (Cathie Marsh Centre for Census & Survey Research)  Tarani Chandola, Kingsley Purdam, Brian Heaphy, Andrew Russell 5

6. Twelve Course Units 6 NEW COURSES/METHODS Figuring out Society: Data and the News (Ian Plewis and Tarani Chandola) The Survey Method in Social Research (Mark Brown) Engaging Social Research (BA in Social Sciences) PARTNER COURSES: EMBEDDING QUANTS MODULES SOCY10471 Sociology of Personal Life ( Sue Heath ) Year 2 teaching on sexualities Paul Simpson, year 3 Brian Heaphy SOCY20241 Sociology of Spiritual Life (Tej Purewal) SOCY30461 Power and Protest ( Gemma Edwards ) SOCY20962 Racism & Ethnicity in the UK (James Rhodes) POLI20801 The Politics of Policy Making (Francesca Gains) (POLI10200) Introduction to Comparative Politics (Nick Turnbull)

7. 2. Scaffolding and procepts  Methods of scaffolding in using ‘embedded quantitative methods’ in sociology/politics.  Scaffolding means building up knowledge through practice in using the words and practices of building blocks. 7

8. Briefing Paper Number 1  See our web site by searching for ESSTED It holds briefing paper 1 on scaffolding, briefing paper 2 on data for dissertations, and video hotlinks. 8

9. Scaffolding depends on procepts idea.  A procept is a process+concept combination, which, with practice, can be used in a habitually rapid way. Thus how the person uses the process+concept changes over time –  … they get faster. Teach them to use procepts, ie simple building-blocks of knowledge.  …they get better at doing it. 9

10. Examples of procepts Applying a theory to a vignette. Questioning the underlying units that are assumed in a theory – the marriage, the couple, the person… Interpreting a table in terms of %s Considering an association between X and Y Recognising that a Concept may be an ‘X’ (e.g. ‘violent behaviour toward wife’) or a Y (e.g. ‘divorce Yes/No’). 10

11. 3. Meaning of Embedding vs Enriching the Curriculum 11 Embedding means putting the quantitative data and methods into the substantive Year 1-2-3 course units, such as Ethnicity, Family Life, Sexualities, Sociology of Religion etc. This builds on scaffolding ideas. We n eed to have an open ming. Enriching means having more social science content in the so- called “Quantitative Methods” course units. These should cover “Research Methods” generally. They should use more than ‘beans’, ‘white/black’ crude examples.

12. Methods of Embedding/Using 12 Building bridges between methods EXAMPLES: Use cluster analysis from an advanced journal article, and link that back to the IDEAL TYPE idea in Weber and to TYPOLOGY in the case-study methods. Use regression in Year 2/3 reading lists, again citing the Peer Reviewed Journal Articles – be very selective. Help students to grasp these articles, suggesting pages which they should print and take notes on. Students practice, practice......tacit learning Make sure the curriculum has a range of skills— graphs, tables, %’s, regression, correlation generalisation, inference, abduction from mixed data

13. 4. Glimpses of Examples Excel is a means to provide information to students in Year 1. Simplify the evidence! Use a 5-pg or 1-page handout of tables. 13 satisfaction with life overall * Lives alone or not Crosstabulation Lives alone or not others in hhdlives aloneTotal satisfaction with life overall missingCount 695223918 % within Lives alone or not 2.00%3.70%2.30% completely dissatisfied Count 714243957 % within Lives alone or not 2.10%4.00%2.40% mostly dissatisfied Count 13222951617 % within Lives alone or not 3.90%4.90%4.00% somewhat dissatisfied Count 22524872739 % within Lives alone or not 6.60%8.10%6.80% neither satisfied or dissatisfied Count 31366013737 % within Lives alone or not 9.20%10.00%9.30% somewhat satisfied Count 584510036848 % within Lives alone or not 17.20%16.60%17.10% mostly satisfied Count 15323228717610 % within Lives alone or not 45.10%37.90%44.00% completely satisfied Count 46738895562 % within Lives alone or not 13.80%14.70%13.90% TotalCount 33960602839988 % within Lives alone or not 100.00% Coverage: United Kingdom. Weighted as a nationally representative sample. Source: Understanding Society data, 2010. For more information, see Persistent Identifier: http://dx.doi.org/10.5255/UKDA-SN-6614-3 or URL http://www.esds.ac.uk/findingData/snDescription. asp?sn=6614 The citation for these data is: University of Essex. Institute for Social and Economic Research and National Centre for Social Research, Understanding Society: Wave 1, 2009- 2010, Data Archive [distributor], February 2012. SN: 6614, http://dx.doi.org/10.5255/UKDA-SN- 6614-3 Too messy! Needs collapsing and simplifying! Excellent Labelling (URL! Dates! Data source! Data from Understanding Society on Solo Living and Life Satisfaction 2010

14. Critical Reader of Data  Student Moves Upward on the Scaffolding Toward the Top Critical Reader of Data Maker of Tables, Graphs User of Microdata 14

15. Critical Reader of Data  Student Moves Around on Scaffolding Critical Reader of Data Maker of Tables, Graphs User of Microdata Rethinks, questions the usual interpretation 15

16. Our Online Materials Show QM in This Context 16 www.socialsciences.manchester.ac.uk/essted

17. Youtube and Vimeo Carry Our Videos – hot links via Google 17

18. Upcoming Workshops 18 Career Development Through Curriculum Leadership (2014/5) More workshops in 2014, 2015

19. Conclusions Thank you for listening 19