1. 1 12-13 EOY Reading 3D NC Comparison Templates The following slides contain a combination of state-level 12-13 EOY mCLASS reports paired with blank templates that you can use to compare your school/district Reading 3D data to state outcomes. You can populate the blank templates with your own data by running your mCLASS “Comparing Populations” and “Correlation/Effectiveness” reports where applicable. For reference, please note that our data analysis indicates that NC state performance tracks relatively close to national mCLASS performance. If you have questions, please contact us at infonc@wgen.netinfonc@wgen.net

2. 2 DIBELS Next Benchmark Comparison (BOY-EOY 12-13) The above DIBELS RAS Comparing Populations report reflects outcomes for all NC K-3 students assessed with Reading 3D at all benchmarks in SY 12-13. To populate the chart in Slide #3, run this same report for your school and/or district and enter the corresponding EOY percentages.

3. 3 DIBELS Next Benchmark Comparison (EOY 12-13)* * “State” percentages reflect all NC K-3 students assessed with mCLASS:Reading 3D at EOY 12-13 Grade Percent of students in each DIBELS instructional category (End of Year 2012-13) Students at benchmark level Students below benchmark level Students well below benchmark level School/ District State School/ District State School/ District State Kindergarten 73%16%11% 1 st Grade 66%13%21% 2 nd Grade 71%13%16% 3 rd Grade 66%13%21%

4. 4 DIBELS Next Growth Comparison (BOY>EOY 12-13) The above DIBELS RAS Correlation/Effectiveness report reflects growth outcomes for all NC K-3 students assessed with Reading 3D at BOY and EOY 12-13. To populate the chart in Slides 5-7, run this same report for your school and/or district and enter the corresponding percentages.

5. 5 DIBELS Next Growth Comparison (BOY>EOY 12-13) BOY Intensive Students Percent of students in each instructional category at end of year 2012-2013 who started the year performing well below benchmark levels Grade Students at benchmark level Students below benchmark level Students well below benchmark level School/ District State School/ District State School/ District State Kindergarten 45%26%29% 1 st Grade 30%18%52% 2 nd Grade 11%20%69% 3 rd Grade 10%15%75%

6. 6 DIBELS Next Growth Comparison (BOY>EOY 12-13) BOY Strategic Students Percent of students in each instructional category at end of year 2012-2013 who started the year performing below benchmark levels Grade Students at benchmark level Students below benchmark level Students well below benchmark level School/ District State School/ District State School/ District State Kindergarten 67%22%10% 1 st Grade 58%20%22% 2 nd Grade 45%34%20% 3 rd Grade 39%33%28%

7. 7 DIBELS Next Growth Comparison (BOY>EOY 12-13) BOY Benchmark Students Percent of students in each instructional category at end of year 2012-2013 who started the year performing at benchmark levels Grade Students at benchmark level Students below benchmark level Students well below benchmark level School/ District State School/ District State School/ District State Kindergarte n 89%9%2% 1 st Grade 84%10%6% 2 nd Grade 90%6%4% 3 rd Grade 87%10%3%

8. 8 TRC Benchmark Comparison (EOY 12-13) The above TRC RAS Comparing Populations report reflects outcomes for all NC K-3 students assessed with Reading 3D at EOY 12-13. To populate the chart in Slide 9, run this same report for your school and/or district and enter the corresponding percentages.

9. 9 TRC Benchmark Comparison (EOY 12-13) Grade Percent of students in each TRC instructional category (End of Year 2012-13) Students above proficient Students proficient Students below proficient Students far below proficient School/ District State School/ District State School/ District State School/ District State Kindergarten45% 20%11%24% 1 st Grade27% 32%16%25% 2 nd Grade34% 30%9%27% 3 rd Grade41% 18%15%26%

10. 10 TRC Growth Comparison (BOY>EOY 12-13) The above TRC RAS Correlation/Effectiveness report reflects growth outcomes for all NC K-3 students assessed with Reading 3D at BOY and EOY 12-13. To populate the chart in Slides 11-13, run this same report for your school and/or district and enter the corresponding percentages.

11. 11 TRC Growth Comparison (BOY>EOY 12-13) BOY Students Far Below Proficient Percent of students in each instructional category at end of year 2012-2013 who started the year performing far below proficient Grade Students above proficient Students proficient Students below proficient Students far below proficient School/ District State School/ District State School/ District State School/ District State Kindergarten 12% 18%15%55% 1 st Grade 5% 20%19%56% 2 nd Grade 1% 12%9%78% 3 rd Grade 4% 9%17%70%

12. 12 TRC Growth Comparison (BOY>EOY 12-13) BOY Students Below Proficient Percent of students in each instructional category at end of year 2012-2013 who started the year performing below proficient Grade Students above proficient Students proficient Students below proficient Students far below proficient School/ District State School/ District State School/ District State School/ District State Kindergarten 29% 27%16%28% 1 st Grade 15% 36%23%26% 2 nd Grade 9% 35%16%40% 3 rd Grade 16% 23%25%36%

13. 13 TRC Growth Comparison (BOY>EOY 12-13); BOY Students Proficient and Above Percent of students in each instructional category at end of year 2012-2013 who started the year performing proficient and above Grade Students above proficient Students proficient Students below proficient Students far below proficient School/ District State School/ District State School/ District State School/ District State Kindergarten 64% 20%9%7% 1 st Grade 41% 36%14%10% 2 nd Grade 46% 34%8%11% 3 rd Grade 55% 21%13%11%