1. The measurement of Innovation An historical perspective The “Frascati Manual” and the “Oslo Manual” S&T indicators Innovation indicators Some evidence from innovation surveys Concluding remarks

2. Development of indicators

3. The linear model Research-based Sequential Tecnocratic

4. “The Chain Link Model” Chain Linked Model of Innovation Potential Markets Invention/ analytical design Detailed design & Test Re-design & Production Distribution & market Knowledge Research Kline & Rosenberg Technology platforms BUS “Communities of practice”

7. Definition of research and development (Frascati Manual) R&D is defined as creative work undertaken on a systematic basis in order to increase the stock of knowledge including knowledge of man, culture and society, and the use of this stock of knowledge to devise new applications.

9. Technological innovation (Oslo Manual) Technological innovations comprise new products and processes and significant technological changes of products, services and processes. An innovation has been implemented if it has been introduced on the market (product and service innovation) or used within a production process (process innovation).

10. Technological innovation (Oslo Manual) Innovations involve a series of scientific, technological, organisational, financial and commercial activities. The product or process should be new (or rignificantly improved) to the firm (it does not necessarily have to be new to the relevant market)

11. Science and technology indicators S&T indicators may be defined as a series of data designed to answer questions about: - the state of the science and technology enterprise, - its internal structure, - its relationships with the outside world, and - the degree S&T is meeting the goals set it, and about its evolution.

12. Science and technology indicators Statistical data are the basic elements (atoms) with which indicators (molecules) are constructed. The questions indicators have to answer concern aspects which can be tacked using quantitavive techniques.

13. Science and technology indicators R&D Patents Bibliometrics Technological balance of payments Human resources for S&T Trade in high-tech products

14. Resources: Scale vs Intensity R&D Expenditure (OECD) Sweden Finland Japan France Germany the Netherlands Denmark UK US Belgium Austria Ireland Italy Spain Portuga l Greece 0 0,005 0,01 0,015 0,02 0,025 0,03 0,035 0,04 1001000100001000001000000 Scale- Total Expenditure in R&D ($PPP; logarithmic scale) Intensity- Share of GDP spent on R&D

15. Output: publications vs expenditure

16. Scientific and technological capacities in OECD Fonte: Caracostas & Muldur (1998)

17. Main indicators from innovation surveys Number of innovating firms –by sector –by firm size Cost of innovation Percentage of sales due to new products

18. The Community Innovation Survey (CIS) The harmonised EU/OECD questionnaire General information about the firm Type of innovation (product, process) Sources of information for innovation Objectives of innovation Factors hampering innovation Cost of innovation Impact of innovation

19. Innovation in EU source: Community Innovation Survey, OCT-PT

20. The Community Innovation Survey (CIS) The harmonised EU/OECD questionnaire R&D Cooperation in innovation User sector of innovation Public policies for innovation Impact of innovation on employment, the environment, firm’s organisation

21. Innovative firms in manufacturing and services in Italy (1990-92) Institute for Studies on Scientific Research and Documentation National Research Council of Italy

22. Objectives of innovation Manufacturing in Italy1994-96 (percentage of firms for which the factor is very relevant) Institute for Studies on Scientific Research and Documentation National Research Council of Italy

23. Obstacles to innovation Manufacturing in Italy1994-96 (percentage of firms for which the factor is relevant) 42 Institute for Studies on Scientific Research and Documentation National Research Council of Italy

24. Sources of information for innovation Manufacturing in Italy1994-96 (percentage of firms for which the factor is relevant) Institute for Studies on Scientific Research and Documentation National Research Council of Italy

25. Innovating firms in manufacturing in Italy (1994-96) Institute for Studies on Scientific Research and Documentation National Research Council of Italy

26. Cost of innovation (percentage) - Italy (1990-92) Institute for Studies on Scientific Research and Documentation National Research Council of Italy

27. Service firms which have carried out innovation activities in Italy 1993-1995 (percentage) R&D Design Know-how Software Training Marketing Investment 13.8 18.5 12.7 52.2 28.9 12.2 53.8 Institute for Studies on Scientific Research and Documentation National Research Council of Italy

28. Innovation activities of service firms (percentages) R&D 13.8 Design 18.5 Know-how 12.7 Software 52.2 Training 28.9 Marketing 12.2 Investment 53.8 Total - 23.7 8.1 3.5 14.1 2.6 1.9 46.0 100.0 Firms which have carried out the activity Innovation expenditure Institute for Studies on Scientific Research and Documentation National Research Council of Italy

29. Innovation expenditure of Italian service firms Institute for Studies on Scientific Research and Documentation National Research Council of Italy

30. Innovation expenditure (percentages) R&D 23.7 Design 8.1 Know-how 3.5 Software 14.1 Training 2.6 Tooling-up, patents - Marketing 1.9 Investment 46.0 Total 100.0 35.8 7.4 - - - 8.1 1.5 47.2 100.0 Service firms (1993-95) Manufacturing firms (1990-92) Institute for Studies on Scientific Research and Documentation National Research Council of Italy

31. Lessons from the CIS survey (1994-1996) Percentage of innovating firms Germany 83 Austria 81 Ireland 79 Finland 69 Spain 53 Italy 50 Poland 34 Turkey 33 82 64 62 46 - 31 - - Manufacturing firms Service firms Institute for Studies on Scientific Research and Documentation National Research Council of Italy

32. Concluding remarks Innovation can be measured We have learnt a lot from innovation surveys and other indicators Still many challenges ahead of us

33. Lessons learned Technological innovation is quite a diffused phenomenon There are wide differences across sectors and size of firm Firms rely on a wide range of innovation sources: investment, R&D and software are the major components of firms' innovation expenditure

34. Lessons learned Major obstacles for introducing technological innovation are of an economic nature - i.e. cost and risk too high Technological information is drawn mainly from outside suppliers of equipment, materials and components as well as from in-house technical departments Internal sources of information are much more important than public research institutions

35. Some challenges Software Services Organisation Information and communication technologies Biotechnologies Employment Environmental sustainability

36. Growth of Knowledge-based industries OECD(2000) UK* Belgium Portugal** Greece* Sweden*** NL* Austria Japan Norway Canada Denmark Spain *** Denmark Mexico Italy US France Korea Germany 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 0102030405060 Share in Business Sector Value Added of Knowledge Based Industries (share year 1996 except: *1995;**1993; ***1994) Average Annual Real Value Added Growth of Knowledge Based Industries (1985-share year)

37. Incentives to BERD 1990-1998 -0.2-0.15-0.1-0.0500.050.10.150.2 Australia US Korea Denmark Switzerland France Belgium Iceland UK Canada Germany Finland Sweden Italy Norway Mexico Austria Ireland Spain Netherlands Japan Portuga l Change in the Amount of Tax Subsidies for 1 US Dollar of R&D SOURCE: OCDE (1999).

38. Some challenges Further development of theories in the knowledge-based economy Innovation surveys allow to take into account complexity Linkage with other industrial data Risk of too much information The advantage of international comparability (“Big science”)