1. March 29, 2011 sustainable energy policy1 Nuclear Power Reconsidered

2.  Wikipedia on Fukushima accidentsFukushima accidents  Several plants had core meltdowns; destroyed  Radiation releases effected local food supply; 1/10 Chernobyl  No immediate deaths due to radiation exposure; 6 workers exceeded lifetime limits  Estimate: 100-1000 future excess deaths March 24, 2011sustainable energy policy

3.  Every energy technology carries a cost; so does the absence of energy technologies. Atomic energy has just been subjected to one of the harshest of possible tests, and the impact on people and the planet has been small. The crisis at Fukushima has converted me to the cause of nuclear power. readread  Japan's horror reveals thinnest of the margin on which modernity lives... We can try to deal with this in two ways. One is to attempt to widen it with more technology…The other possibility is to try to build down a little: to focus on resilience, on safety. And to do that – here's the controversial part – instead of focusing on growth.readread March 24, 2011sustainable energy policy George Monbiot Bill McKibben

4. March 29, 2011 sustainable energy policy4 Agenda Nuclear power: resource characteristics Political psychology of risk analysis Governance Policy – BC Policy – AB Conclusion

5. March 24, 2011 sustainable energy policy5 Reactor Design - LWR Uses “light water” – regular water Nuclear fuel needs to be enriched –Natural uranium only contains 0.7% fissionable U 235 –Up to 3-5% (90% for bomb)

6. March 24, 2011 sustainable energy policy6 Reactor Design - CANDU CANada Deuterium Uranium Does not need enriched uranium But needs “heavy water” - water which contains a higher proportion than normal of the isotope deuterium of hydrogen Lower meltdown risk because loss of water shuts down reaction

7. March 24, 2011 sustainable energy policy7 Nuclear Power Worldwide 17% of world’s electricity generation Country with most capacity installed: US Country most dependent: France (~80%)

8. March 29, 2011 sustainable energy policy8 Resource Characteristics (1) abundance – relatively high energy density – extremely high –One uranium pellet, which weighs about 20 grams, can provide energy equal to: 400 kilograms of coal 270 litres of oil or 300 cubic metres of natural gas (Candu site) cost per unit energy – high reliability – moderately high

9. Asustainable energy policy Wiki

10. March 29, 2011 sustainable energy policy10 Environmental Impacts “nuclear power has zero emissions of carbon dioxide, sulpher dioxide, and nitrous oxides” Duane Bratt (2005), p. 110 “nuclear power has the smallest “footprint” in terms of the amount of energy generated per hectacre of land.” (Alberta Expert Panel Review)

11. March 29, 2011 sustainable energy policy11 Environmental Impacts Lower GHG impacts “The fallacy of zero emissions” Need to consider entire fuel cycle –uranium mining and milling –uranium refining –conversion and fuel fabrication –waste fuel management

12. March 29, 2011 sustainable energy policy12 Comparative CO2 emissions Oxford Research Group, Secure Energy, http://www.oxfordresearchgroup.org.uk/publications/briefing_papers/pdf/secureenergy.pdf

13. March 29, 2011 sustainable energy policy13 Risk - Safety low probability of potentially catastrophic event meltdown –failure of cooling system –runaway chain reaction –significant release of radiation

14. March 29, 2011 sustainable energy policy14 Risk – Nuclear Proliferation nuclear weapons require highly enriched uranium or plutonium technology used to enrich uranium for commercial nuclear power can also be used for weapons “dirty bombs”

15. March 29, 2011 sustainable energy policy15 Risk – Nuclear Waste high vs low level high level “unsolved” in any jurisdiction long half-lives require containment for 10,000s years deep burial technologically and economically feasible sites approved in Finland; operation a long way off material stored at existing facilities indefinitely

16. March 29, 2011sustainable energy policy

17. March 29, 2011 sustainable energy policy17 Agenda Nuclear power: resource characteristics Political psychology of risk analysis Governance Policy – BC Policy – AB Conclusion

18. Political psychology of risk analysis Risk: probability times consequence Most analysts believe nuclear power risks are low Psychologists note how people focus more on catastrophic or unfamiliar consequences Special political constraint to nuclear power March 29, 2011 sustainable energy policy18

19. March 29, 2011 sustainable energy policy19 Nuclear Image: From Panacea to Nightmare Highly contested image Pre-1970’s: promising high technology, “too cheap to meter” 1970’s – one of major issues of environmental (anti-nuclear) - Came to symbolize –Danger –Environmental destruction –Centralization Aggravated by Three Mile Island (1979) and Chernobyl (1986)

20. March 29, 2011sustainable energy policy

21. March 29, 2011 sustainable energy policy21 Is Reframing Possible? Can it be successfully reframed in the wake of climate change Canadian Nuclear Association:Canadian Nuclear Association –Clean –Reliable –Affordable

22. March 29, 2011sustainable energy policy

23.  Loan guarantees ($8 billion)  New enthusiasm for small modular reactors small modular reactors  LWR technology  As small as 40-150 MW  Plug and play: Made in factories and transported (reducing construction costs) March 29, 2011sustainable energy policy

24. March 29, 2011 sustainable energy policy24 Agenda Nuclear power: resource characteristics Political psychology of risk analysis Governance Policy – BC Policy – AB

25. March 24, 2011 sustainable energy policy25 Governance: Single Most Important Actor in Nuclear Industry?

26. March 24, 2011 sustainable energy policy26 Governance: Single Most Important Actor in Nuclear Industry?

27. March 29, 2011 sustainable energy policy27 Governance – Institutions federal jurisdiction paramount due to safety and security issues Also international jurisdiction under IAEAIAEA provincial approval will still be required

28. March 29, 2011 sustainable energy policy28 Governance – Actors Federal Government  Atomic Energy Canada Ltd (AECL) – a crown corporation that makes and sells the CANDU reactorAECL  2009 – Harper government announced plans to privatize commercial reactor divisionannounced  2011 – CANDU Energy Inc sold to SNC-Lavalin–SNC-Lavalin  The Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission (CNSC)CNSC  independent quasi-judicial agency  reports to Parliament through the Minister of Natural Resources  regulates the use of nuclear energy and materials to protect health, safety, security and the environment

29. March 29, 2011 sustainable energy policy29 Governance – Actors Industry Canadian Nuclear Association Bruce Power –private nuclear power generating company –20% of Ontario’s electricity –Bruce Power Alberta – new entity 36% owned by CamecoCameco

30. March 29, 2011 sustainable energy policy30 Governance – Actors Environmental Groups Pembina Greenpeace

31. March 29, 2011 sustainable energy policy31 Current Policy: Federal Policy Nuclear Safety Control Act governs approval processprocess site application triggers need for EA CNSC is lead no specific policy to promote nuclear power

32. March 29, 2011 sustainable energy policy32 Agenda Nuclear power: resource characteristics Political psychology of risk analysis Governance Policy – BC Policy – AB

33. Current Policy - BC Formally opposed to nuclear power –2002, 2007 Energy Plans reaffirm commitments –Closest nuclear site is the Columbia Generating Station near Richland, Washington (1.1 GW) (Energy Information Administration)Columbia Generating Station –New google earth featureearth March 29, 2011 sustainable energy policy33

34. Current policy - Alberta Current Alberta generating capacity (12 GW – 2007) –60% coal –30% natural gas –10% hydro power demand projected to increase 75% by 2024 compared to 2007 capacityprojected GHG concerns have provoked interest Bruce Power Alberta proposed to build 4 reactors in Peace Region Prompted government to establish expert panel (April 08) March 29, 2011 sustainable energy policy34

35. Expert Panel Expert Panel Conclusions February 2009 Report largely positive Economically, $370 million in economic activity annually per reactor Environmentally, a plant releases no carbon dioxide footprint on the landscape similar to hydro & wind Waste disposal methods compared to CCS Safety -3rd and 4th generation reactors offer improved safety procedures All plants are subject to IAEA scrutiny. Socially; “It is the panel's view that there are no separate social issues which fall within provincial jurisdiction that are uniquely associated with nuclear power generation...”. The GoA would meet many of the same challenges in nuclear plant construction that they do in large oil & gas developments.

36.  No special treatment: “The Government of Alberta has decided to maintain its existing policy where power generation options are proposed by the private sector in the province, and any nuclear power proposal would be considered on a case-by-case basis”decided March 29, 2011sustainable energy policy

37. March 29, 2011 sustainable energy policy37 Bruce Power Proposal http://www.brucepower.com/pagecontentAB.aspx?navuid=9090 2-4 reactors for 4000 MW –Not directly tied to oil sands $10 billion Neutral on reactor choice at present Current site located 30 Km north of Peace River

38. March 29, 2011 sustainable energy policy38 Bruce Power Proposal Application for site license filed March 2008 Triggers an EA under Canadian Environmental Assessment Act Proposal dropped in December 2011dropped

39. March 29, 2011 sustainable energy policy39 Conclusion Renaissance due to lower GHG emissions Cost a serious issue Comes with different risk profile Serious risk perception issues Probable significant contribution to Alberta power supply

40.  Nuclear power is expensive, and poses significant environmental risks and the risk of catastrophic events including nuclear weapons proliferation. However, given the immense challenge of reducing greenhouse gases, it is … A. Unacceptable B. Acceptable only if we can solve the problem of waste storage C. Worth serious consideration D. Acceptable as a transitional source or energy E. A necessary risk March 29, 2011sustainable energy policy