Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byClementine Moody Modified over 9 years ago
1
Two Recipes for Sustained Achievement Growth in Saint Paul Nancy Stachel and Michelle Odeen Como Park Elementary Audrey Bridgeford, Sheila Kluxdal and Nancy Mambi Sheridan Elementary Tom Watkins Research, Evaluation and Assessment Department
2
Intended Outcomes 4 An overview of the formative assessment systems in Como Park and Sheridan 4 Examples of how these systems inform instruction 4 Examples of how SPPS calculates achievement growth on the SAT10 4 How each school uses district and state summative data for continuous improvement
3
80%29%37%16%Caucasian 8%28%24%34% African American 5%12% 9%Latino 5%29%27%39%Asian American 2% American Indian 14%17%12%17% Special Education 6%34%28%41%ELL 28%66%63%84% Free/Reduced Lunch 842,91542,372304483 Total Enrollment State Saint Paul Sheridan Como Park Demographic Comparisons – October 1, 2003
5
Como Park Elementary School Data Summary Reading Math
7
Sheridan Elementary School Data Summary Reading Math
8
Como Park Elementary Nancy Stachel, Principal Michelle Odeen, Technology Coordinator
9
3 Critical Questions (DuFour) 4 What is it that we expect students to learn? 4 How will we know when they have learned it? 4 How will we respond when they don’t learn?
10
Teachers’ mindset … what must we address What does “data” mean? Accountability vs. Reflection Reflection is “the use of data for improvement.” Conzemius and O’Neill Shame and blame vs. Inquiry
11
Teachers’ mindset continued … Usable data vs. just collecting data Standardized assessments – examine trends Use to address curricular or program concerns Important to guide the process – identify expected outcomes for evaluating standardized assessment data Data to inform daily instruction Needs to be varied, fluid – designed to address the topic being evaluated Data can be used to identify what isn’t working, but also to see what is working
12
Teachers’ mindset continued … Data is an objective 3 rd person Moving from “Collaboration” to Professional Learning Communities Professional Learning Communities require teachers to work together to develop their skills – this includes the ability to critique as well as praise
13
The real voyage in discovery consists not in seeking new landscapes, but in having new eyes. Marcel Proust
14
Frequent Assessment Focus 4 Curriculum Based Measures –Fluency/1-minute reading-every 2 weeks –MAZE/cloze activity- Fall, Winter, Spring 4 Prevention Testing-Fall, Winter, Spring 4 STAR Assessments-Fall, Winter, Spring –Early Literacy-as requested by teacher 4 Accelerated Reader & Math-ongoing
15
Initial Assessments 4 Provide baseline data 4 At-risk students are identified 4 Academic goals are set & plans for instruction developed
16
Instructional Plan Implemented 4 Intense small group instruction 4 Individual re-teaching 4 Student training on procedures and data evaluation 4 Subsequent assessments given
17
Is the student making adequate progress? NoYes Continue current plan until goal is reachedMove on to other problem skillsProvide challenge Why not? No accountability-student/parent/teacherCurriculum orinstructional methodsStudent not engagedAttendance INTERVENE
18
Formal & Informal Use of Data 4 Creates cumulative data for student record 4 Informs instruction for individual, small group, & large group 4 Teachers have a better sense of students’ academic strengths & needs
19
Supporting a Data Driven System 4 Staff development –Administering & scoring assessments –Interpreting data –Using data to inform instruction –Using technology to organize & present data 4 Technology 4 Time –Discuss data with colleagues –Review the value of assessments
20
Sheridan Elementary Audrey Bridgeford, Principal Nancy Mambi, Librarian Sheila Kluxdal, 5 th Grade Teacher
22
Assessment Instruction Curriculum
23
Assessment Synergy To inform: Public Accountability Students Teachers Families Program Planning Leaders Achievement Standards Assessment Literate Teachers Enabling Classroom Targets Periodic Standardized Testing Ongoing Classroom Assessment
24
School Data Summative Assessment Data Formative Data by Grade Level/Content Area Formative Data by Classroom Usually given at the end of the year Periodic Assessment to show progress throughout the year Frequent Assessment to show progress of each student Data Assessment
25
School data Community Perception Data Assessment Data Program Effectiveness Data Student Information Data
27
Crucial Distinction Assessment of Learning: How much have students learned as of a particular point of time? Assessment for Learning: How can we use assessment to help students learn more?
34
…and that’s the end of our tale. Sheridan Elementary http://sheridan.spps.org
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.