Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Modeling Type Ia Supernovae from ignition, to explosion, to emission

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Modeling Type Ia Supernovae from ignition, to explosion, to emission"— Presentation transcript:

1 Modeling Type Ia Supernovae from ignition, to explosion, to emission
Daniel Kasen UC Santa Cruz

2 Supernova Discovery History Asiago Catalog (all supernova types)

3 Supernova Discovery Future Rough predictions and promises…
Supernova Factory Lick observatory SN search CfA SN group Carnegie SN project ESSENCE Supernova Legacy Survey Can we use Type Ia SNe as reliable standard candles at the few % level? Systematic error, not statistical error, is the issue (e.g., luminosity evolution) PanStarrs Dark Energy Survey JDEM Large Synoptic Survey Telescope (LSST)

4 SN Ia Progenitors Accreting white dwarf near the Chandrasekhar limit
Issues with the single degenerate scenario Where is the hydrogen? How do you make them in old (~10 Gyr) systems? What about observed “Super-Chandra” events? Could double white dwarf systems be the answer? Accretion rate: 10-7 Msun / year

5 Fe 56Ni Si/S/Ca C/O C/O boom

6 Type Ia Supernova Light Curves powered by the beta decay: 56Ni 56Co 56Fe

7 Type Ia Width-Luminosity Relation brighter supernovae have broader light curves

8 Type Ia Supernova Spectrum
20 days after explosion

9 Toy Type Ia Supernova Models
Fe 56Ni Si/S/Ca C/O Toy Type Ia Supernova Models w/ Stan Woosley Sergei Blinikov Elena Sorokina Spherical Chandrasekhar mass models with varied composition Parameters MFe MNi MSi “mixing” MFe + MNi + MSi + Mco = MCH

10 3-dimensional Time-Dependent Monte Carlo Radiative Transfer
SEDONA Code Expanding atmosphere Realistic opacities Three-dimensional Time-dependent Multi-wavelength Includes spectropolarization Treats radioactive decay and gamma-ray transfer Iterative solution for thermal equilibrium Non-LTE capability Kasen et al 2006 ApJ

11 EJECTA MODEL

12 Broadband Synthetic Light Curves Model Compared to observations of SN 2001el
Parameters MFe = 0.1 Msun MNi = 0.6 Msun MSi = 0.4 Msun Kasen, ApJ 2006 Kasen (2006) ApJ

13 Time Evolution of Spectrum Recession of photosphere reveals deeper layers
Day 15 after explosion Day 35 after explosion C/O Si/S/Ca Model SN1994D 56Ni Fe

14 Spectroscopic Time Series
Optical Spectroscopic Time Series Day 1 to Day 100

15 Width-Luminosity Relationship Kasen and Woosley, ApJ, 2007

16 Supernova Ejecta Opacity blending of millions of line transitions
FeII bound-bound FeIII bound-bound

17 Infrared Secondary Maximum marks the transition from FeIII to FeII
I-Band Kasen (2006) ApJ All iron is FeII T ~ 7000 K FeIII starts becoming FeII

18 Infrared Secondary Maximum brighter supernovae have later secondary maxima
I-Band Kasen (2006) ApJ Vary 56Ni mass from Msun Kasen (2007)

19 Origin of the Width-Luminosity Relation dimmer SN are cooler, and recombine to FeII faster
B-band I-band

20 Model Width-Luminosity Relation Woosley, Kasen, Blinnikov, Sorokina, ApJ (2007)
SN 99by B-band SN 91T

21 Presupernova Evolution Type Ia supernova modeling challenge
(~ years) accreting, convective white dwarf Type Ia supernova modeling challenge ignition Explosion (~1-100 secs) turbulent nuclear combustion / hydrodynamics free expansion Light Curves / Spectra (~1-100 days) radioactive decay / radiative transfer Observations

22 White Dwarf Convection and Ignition Kuhlen, Woosley, and Glaitzmeier (2006)

23 White Dwarf Convection (No rotation) 3-D calculation, Ma and Woosley

24 White Dwarf Convection (With Rotation) 3-D calculation, Ma and Woosley

25 3D Deflagration Model Subsonic turbulent combustion
t = 1.5 sec t = 1.0 sec t = 0.0 sec t = 0.5 sec Roepke et al. (2005)

26 2D Deflagration Model Roepke, Kasen, Woosley MNi = 0.2 Msun
EK = 0.3 x 1051 ergs

27 Gamezo et al. Deflagration To Detonation Khokhlov (1991) Hoeflich (1994) Gamezo et al (2005) But how to detonate?

28 2D Delayed Detonation The stronger the deflagration phase
Roepke, Kasen, Woosley The stronger the deflagration phase  the more pre-expansion  the lower the densities at detonation  the less 56Ni produced MNi = 0.5 Msun EK = 1.2 x 1051 ergs

29 Off-Center Ignition University of Chicago FLASH Center

30 Hillebrandt, Sim, Roepke 2007
Off-center Detonation Roepke, Kasen, Woosley An alternative to super-chandra SNe? Howell et al, 2006 Hillebrandt, Sim, Roepke 2007 MNi = 1.0 Msun EK = 1.3 x 1051 ergs

31 Spectrum of Off-center Detonation expansion velocities depend on orientation
I-Band Kasen (2006) ApJ

32 Spectroscopic Homogeneity and Diversity monitoring silicon expansion velocities
from Leonard et al, ApJ 2006

33 Asymmetry and Polarization Observed SNeIa are polarized at ~0
Asymmetry and Polarization Observed SNeIa are polarized at ~0.4 % level

34 Asymmetry and Polarization Model polarization spectrum at maximum light as seen from different viewing angles

35 The Theoretical Understanding of Type Ia Supernovae
Pressing Questions What are the progenitors? How and where does ignition happen? How might the deflagration transition into a detonation? How do the light curves depend upon the progenitor and its environment?


Download ppt "Modeling Type Ia Supernovae from ignition, to explosion, to emission"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google