Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Cultivating the next generation of Plant Biologists: opportunities and challenges Muriel Poston, Ph.D. Dean of Faculty and Professor, Environmental Analysis.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Cultivating the next generation of Plant Biologists: opportunities and challenges Muriel Poston, Ph.D. Dean of Faculty and Professor, Environmental Analysis."— Presentation transcript:

1 Cultivating the next generation of Plant Biologists: opportunities and challenges Muriel Poston, Ph.D. Dean of Faculty and Professor, Environmental Analysis Pitzer College

2 Recent STEM Reports: U. S. Scientific Workforce  Rising Above the Gathering Storm: Energizing and employing America for a brighter economic future, (2007) National Academies Press  Preparing the Next Generation of STEM Innovators: Identifying and Developing our Nation’s Human Capital (2010) National Science Board  Expanding underrepresented minority preparation: America’s science and technology talent at the crossroads, (2011) National Academies Press  The Federal Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) education portfolio: A report from the federal inventory STEM education, (2011) National Science and Technology Council  STEM, (2011) Georgetown University Center on Education and the Workforce

3 Recruiting the Next Generation of Plant Biologist: changing populations  Demographics of student populations are changing Increasing Female student populations Increasing Students of Color  What are the implications for academic practice in the discipline?

4 SOURCE: Women, Minorities and Persons With Disabilities in Science and Engineering-2004 Women, Minorities, and Persons with Disabilities in Science and Engineering: 2013 www.nsf.gov/statistics/wmpd/ Resident population of the United States, by sex and race/ethnicity: 2010

5 SOURCE: Women, Minorities and Persons With Disabilities in Science and Engineering-2004 U.S. population 18–24 years old, by race/ethnicity: July 1990–99 and projections to 2050

6 Freshman Intention to major in STEM and Biology/Ag STEM Bio/Ag Whites37% 10.8% Asian/P.I.49% 18.3% Blacks36.5% 10.9% Hispanics40% 11.7% Am.In./A.N.27.6% 8.9% Source: NSF/NCSES, Women, Minorities, and Persons with Disabilities in S&E (2013)

7 STEM Degrees for Underrepresented Groups  The number of S&E bachelor’s degrees for all racial/ethnic groups except whites have been stable or increased since 2001 2001 2010  Asians/Pacific Islander: 9.5% 9.9%  Blacks 8.7% 8.6%  Hispanics 7.4% 9.1%  Amer. Indians/Alaska Nat. 0.7% 0.7%  White 69.6% 64.4%  STEM Bachelor degrees are 31.5% of all BA degrees Source: NSF/NCSES, Women, Minorities, and Persons with Disabilities in S&E (2013)

8 Blacks, Hispanics, and American Indians/Alaska Natives are underrepresented in STEM disciplines URM women are a smaller percentage of STEM graduates than Whites or Asians and less likely to be employed in STEM fields Asian and White women earn a higher percentage of degrees in STEM than URM women, BUT at a lower percentage than Asian or White men STEM Degrees for Underrepresented Groups

9 Women, Minorities, and Persons with Disabilities in Science and Engineering: 2013 www.nsf.gov/statistics/wmpd/ Science and engineering bachelor’s degrees earned by underrepresented minorities, by field: 1991–2010

10 BA degrees in Biological Sciences 20012010  % of all science 18.2%19.9%  Female 59.7%59%  White 68% 62%(57.6% female)  Asian/PI 12.4%16.5%(58.1% female)  Black 7.7%7.4%(70% female)  Hispanic 7.5%8.2%(61.1% female)  AmIn/NA 0.7%0.6%(58.7% female) Source: NSF/NCSES, Women, Minorities, and Persons with Disabilities in S&E (2013)

11 Women, Minorities, and Persons with Disabilities in Science and Engineering: 2013 www.nsf.gov/statistics/wmpd/ Science and engineering bachelor's degrees earned by underrepresented minority women, by field: 1991–2010

12 Minority Serving Institutions: Opportunities for cultivation Hispanic Serving Institutions (HSI)  25% FT Latino undergraduate enrollment  356 HSI (represent 11% of all IHE)  54% Latinos enrolled in HSIs Historically Black Colleges/Universities  Federally designated  105 HBCUs (18 are 1890 land grant univ.) Predominantly Black Institutions  40% FT Black undergraduate enrollment  <35 institutions (primarily two-year colleges) Tribal Colleges  Federally designated  <30 institutions (primarily two-year institutions

13 STEM Degrees for Underrepresented Groups  Within each racial/ethnic group, the top baccalaureate granting schools for men and women are mostly the same schools For Hispanic men and women, the top degree granting schools are largely in Puerto Rico, California, Texas, and Florida—states with large populations of Hispanics For Black men and women, the top degree granting schools are HBCUs and PBIs For American Indians/Alaska natives, the top degree granting schools are largely in Oklahoma, Arizona and other states with large American Indian/Alaska Native population. One is a tribal college

14 STEM Degrees for Underrepresented Groups  Women are over 60% of all students enrolled in higher education  Since 2002 women have earned 58% of all bachelor degrees  In STEM disciplines women have earned the higher proportion of bachelor degrees in: Psychology: 77% Social Sciences: 54% Biological Sciences: 60% Chemistry: 50% Agriculture: 50%

15 Women, Minorities, and Persons with Disabilities in Science and Engineering: 2013 www.nsf.gov/statistics/wmpd/ Medium participation fields for women: Biosciences and social sciences, 1991–2010

16 Strategies for enhancing undergraduate URG in STEM  Factors that influence selection and persistence in STEM majors by URG: Precollege programs that connect students to campuses Prior academic preparation Emphasis on undergraduate education and student engagement Emphasis on academic advising/support Campus/classroom climate impact on student engagement Adequate financial aid Institutional commitment Cole and Espinoza (2009), J. of Women and Minorities in S&E, 15:263-277

17 Strategies in STEM Education for Underrepresented Groups  Characteristics of successful programs that increase recruitment and retention: Curriculum reflects real world problems Academic support and social integration  Peer2Peer; study groups; social activities Mentoring Perceived respect of instructors Summer programs: motivation and access Research experiences: engagement Professional development opportunities

18 President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology Report: Engage to Excel (2011)  Close the gap in mathematics preparation for entering undergraduates  Emphasize discovery based research courses in the undergraduate science curriculum  Diversify pathways to science careers in order to broaden participation of all students in STEM fields

19 Scientists and engineers working in science and engineering occupations: 2010

20  In the 21 st century women have a higher participation rate in higher education than men  Women doctoral degree recipients in non- S&E fields have exceed men over the last two decades  Women doctoral degree recipients in S&E fields have continued to increase over the same period but have yet to reach parity with men STEM Degrees for Underrepresented Groups

21 Doctorate Recipients from U.S. Universities 2011; www.nsf.gov/statistics/sed/ Doctorates awarded in science and engineering fields of study: 1991–2011

22 Doctorate Recipients from U.S. Universities 2011; www.nsf.gov/statistics/sed/ Doctorates awarded to minority U.S. citizens and permanent residents, by race/ethnicity and field of study: 2011

23 Ph.D. degrees all fields  1980-812010-11 White: 90.9%70.7% Black: 4.2% 9.2% Hispanic: 2.1% 6.1% Asian/PI: 2.4% 12.4% AmIn/NA: 0.3% 0.6%  Doctoral Degrees in Biological Sciences Female:  28% 52.6% Source: U.S. Department of Education, Digest of Educational Statistics (2012)

24 NSF: Survey of Earned Doctorates

25

26

27

28 Number of Ph.D. degrees in Biological Sciences 20012010  Total:  35795447  White:  26893759  Asian:  399650  Black:  101206  Hispanic:  155326  AmIn/NA  1421 Source: NSF/NCSES, Women, Minorities, and Persons with Disabilities in S&E (2013)

29 Women, Minorities, and Persons with Disabilities in Science and Engineering: 2013 www.nsf.gov/statistics/wmpd/ Science and engineering degrees earned by underrepresented minorities: 1991–2010

30 Women, Minorities, and Persons with Disabilities in Science and Engineering: 2013 www.nsf.gov/statistics/wmpd/ Science and engineering degrees earned by underrepresented minority women: 1991–2010

31 STEM Faculty from Underrepresented Groups  Concurrent with the changes in doctoral degree recipients have been changes in faculty composition  Increasing number of female faculty  Differential representation in institutional types by gender

32 AAUP: Trends in Faculty Status, 1975-2011 (all institutions, national totals) 1975 1995 20032011 FT T/TT : 45.1% 34.8% 26.0% 24.0% Contingent*: 54.9% 65.6% 74.0%75.9% *(FT NTT, PT, Grad) Total Instructional staff: 783,370 1,147,615 1,591,644 1,846,895 Source: US Department of Education, NCES, Digest of Educational Statistics (2012), Compiled by AAUP Research Office, Washington, DC; John W. Curtis, Director Of Research (7/13)

33 Proportion of FT Faculty at all Degree granting institutions  Gender: 56.1% men 43.9% women  Race/ethnicity: White: 74% Black: 5.5% Am. Indian: 0.5% Hispanic: 4.1% Asian/P.I: 8.8% NR alien: 4.2% Source: U.S. Department of Education, NCES, Digest of Educational Statistics (2012); compiled by John Curtis, Director of Research, AAUP, 7/2013)

34 Proportion of FT Faculty by Institutional Type  Doctoral:MenWomen FT T/TT:53.3%20.6% FT NTT:10.9%13.2% Total (203,048)  Masters: FT T/TT43.5%33.4% NTT 9.7%13.4% Total (118,542)  Baccalaureate: FT/TT42.5%33.1% NTT11.6%12.7% Total (52,789) Source: AAUP Faculty Compensation Survey (1060 institutions, 2012-13); John W. Curtis, Director of Research (7/2013)

35 Women and underrepresented minorities as a percentage of full-time, full professors with science and engineering doctorates: 1979–2008 Women, Minorities, and Persons with Disabilities in Science and Engineering: 2011 www.nsf.gov/statistics/wmpd/

36 Cultivating the next generation of faculty in Biological Sciences  Factors that influence career choice Values influence  Academic Freedom  Impact on community/issues relevant to individual Structural Realities  Training environment  Job market  Faculty work  Grant funding opportunities Gibbs, K. and K. Griffin, (2013), Ph.D. Career Choice, submitted CBE Life Science

37 STEM Faculty from Underrepresented Groups  URG Faculty composition has impact on URG student participation and success in STEM Campus/classroom climate Role Model Mentoring Price, J. (2010) Economics of Education Review 29:901-10

38 STEM Faculty from Underrepresented Groups  Structural Barriers that affect faculty at all institutions including MSIs Mentoring/Role Models Balancing Faculty Roles:  Teaching, Research, Service Institutional Infrastructure Work/Family

39 Thank you! Questions? Contact: muriel_poston@pitzer.edu

40 NSF: Survey of Earned Doctorates


Download ppt "Cultivating the next generation of Plant Biologists: opportunities and challenges Muriel Poston, Ph.D. Dean of Faculty and Professor, Environmental Analysis."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google