1. Integrated Science Initiative Washington University in St. Louis Slide 1 3 March 25, 2013

2. Integrated Science Initiative Washington University in St. Louis Slide 2 Agenda Welcome and introduction Progress update: department meetings Scenario 1 Scenario 2 Evaluation Next steps

3. Integrated Science Initiative Washington University in St. Louis Slide 3 How can we be competitive in the Sciences? Leading Together Priorities: Attract and retain outstanding faculty Attract a talented and diverse student body Advance the scholarship, research and creative potential of students and faculty Further strengthen an exceptional teaching, research and living environment Key Facilities Needs Interdisciplinary research labs Location and proximity of labs and equipment Collaboration spaces Flexible lab planning strategies Core labs, shared labs and equipment Fluid connections (vertical and horizontal) to encourage interaction

4. Integrated Science Initiative Washington University in St. Louis Slide 4 Framework Plan 1.Stabilize and expand core disciplines Biology Build capacity for long-term aspirations and renewal Address immediate needs of core disciplines, particularly in Chemistry and Physics +/- 7,300 NSF of interdisciplinary institute space in Rudolph Hall by Fall 2013 Opportunities to enhance connectivity with biology Chemistry Physics IMSE

5. Integrated Science Initiative Washington University in St. Louis Slide 5 Framework Plan 1.Stabilize and expand core disciplines 2.Identify zones of future expansion A B C E D Biology Chemistry Physics IMSE

6. Integrated Science Initiative Washington University in St. Louis Slide 6 January 31 Meeting: Initial Exploration of Near-term Sites Radiochem EH&S Millbrook Site Compton Crow Site

7. Integrated Science Initiative Washington University in St. Louis Slide 7 Department Meeting Summary Chemistry Physical chemistry has most critical needs within department Fitting out cave space in Lab Sciences addresses some immediate needs Radiochem site may not serve physical chemists due to possible vibration and EMI issues Concerns with loading dock Physics Strong interest/desire for collaborative, collegial spaces Concern about construction site next to research space – could interfere with equipment Adjustments to high-bay space suggested Concerns with loading dock

8. Integrated Science Initiative Washington University in St. Louis Slide 8 Department Meeting Outcome Both departments challenged us to return to Bryan, Jolley and Urbauer as the centralized area to cultivate interdisciplinary research expansion. BRYAN 11’-7” floor to floor JOLLEY 12’ floor to floor URBAUER 12’ floor to floor Throop Drive

9. Integrated Science Initiative Washington University in St. Louis Slide 9 Integrated Science Initiative Where to invest? When? 1. Interdisciplinary Hubs Concept Create hubs of interdisciplinary spaces adjacent to existing department locations Continues dispersed, incremental strategy but addresses immediate needs first Fewer enabling projects 2. Interdisciplinary Core Concept Build a robust interdisciplinary center between Chemistry and Physics Ideal, centralized location Requires significant initial investment in relocating existing SEAS space 1. Interdisciplinary Hubs Concept 2. Interdisciplinary Core Concept

10. Integrated Science Initiative Washington University in St. Louis Slide 10 Integrated Science Initiative Common Characteristics Address defined needs Preserves long-term development capacity Creates significant amounts of highest priority space: interdisciplinary research labs Provides multiple options for renewal and/or expansion of teaching facilities Common Unresolved Issues SEAS space utilization and needs Service access and loading – coordination with Throop Drive Utilities infrastructure and parking requirements and impacts 1. Interdisciplinary Hubs Concept 2. Interdisciplinary Core Concept

11. Integrated Science Initiative Washington University in St. Louis Slide 11 RELOCATE EH&S AND RADIOCHEMISTRY DEMOLISH PARKING GARAGE BAY (LOSS OF 60 SPACES) FIT OUT CAVE SPACE IN LAB SCIENCE FOR PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY A B Scenario 1: Interdisciplinary Hubs Concept C A RADIOCHEM PARKING BAY B CHEMISTRY C EH&S A NEW CONSTRUCTION

12. Integrated Science Initiative Washington University in St. Louis Slide 12 BUILD NEW CHEMISTRY AND INTERDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH BUILDING NEW BLDG: +75-110,000 GSF (+40,500-59,400 NSF) D Scenario 1: Interdisciplinary Hubs Concept INTERDISC NEW CONSTRUCTION

13. Integrated Science Initiative Washington University in St. Louis Slide 13 RELOCATE CHEMISTRY FROM OLDER SPACES IN McMILLEN AND LOUDERMAN E Scenario 1: Interdisciplinary Hubs Concept E CHEMISTRY NEW CONSTRUCTION

14. Integrated Science Initiative Washington University in St. Louis Slide 14 IF SITE CANNOT ACCOMMODATE PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY, BUILD NEW BIOLOGY AND CHEMISTRY BUILDING NEW BLDG: +75-110,000 GSF (+40,500-59,400 NSF) F Scenario 1: Interdisciplinary Hubs Concept - Option F BIOLOGY NEW CONSTRUCTION University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

15. Integrated Science Initiative Washington University in St. Louis Slide 15 Scenario 1: Interdisciplinary Hubs Concept – Option E BIOLOGY EMPTY AND DEMOLISH BUSCH LABS, GOLDFARB, AND LIFE SCIENCES (43,000 GSF or 17,800 NSF) E NEW CONSTRUCTION

16. Integrated Science Initiative Washington University in St. Louis Slide 16 Scenario 1: Interdisciplinary Hubs Concept – Option BUILD NEW BIOLOGY/CHEMISTRY BUILDING; MOVE PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY INTO THIS SITE NEW BLDG: +96,000GSF (+52,000NSF) F BIOLOGY F CHEMISTRY F ENGINEERING PHYSICS EARTH & PLANETARY SCI MATH BIOLOGY NEW CONSTRUCTION INTERDISCIPLINARY

17. Integrated Science Initiative Washington University in St. Louis Slide 17 BUILD ADDITION ON COMPTON AND CROW FOR PHYSICS NEW BLDG: +60,000 GSF (+32,400 NSF) E Scenario 1: Interdisciplinary Hubs Concept NEW CONSTRUCTION

18. Integrated Science Initiative Washington University in St. Louis Slide 18 FILL NEW ADDITION WITH PHYSICS RESEARCH, RENOVATE REMAINING COMPTON/CROW SPACE FOR CONTINUED PHYSICS AND MATH USE E Scenario 1: Interdisciplinary Hubs Concept E PHYSICS COMPTON/CROW E NEW CONSTRUCTION

19. Integrated Science Initiative Washington University in St. Louis Slide 19 F MATH MOVE MATH INTO CROW; RENOVATE CUPPLES I FOR SWING SPACE AND LONG-TERM REUSE BY OTHER A&S UNITS BACKFILL COMPTON WITH DEPT GROWTH AND INTERDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH F G G Scenario 1: Interdisciplinary Hubs Concept INTERDISC F A&S TBD NEW CONSTRUCTION

20. Integrated Science Initiative Washington University in St. Louis Slide 20 Scenario 1: Interdisciplinary Hubs Concept New Construction Renovation

21. Integrated Science Initiative Washington University in St. Louis Slide 21 Interdisciplinary Hubs Concept Pros First building sites require few enabling projects Critical needs addressed first Implementation of major components not dependent on each other Strengthens northern edge of campus Cons Follows pattern of incremental development Continues dispersed academic adjacencies Does not integrate directly with Engineering Unknown variables with Radiochem site (vibration, EMI) may not support physical chemistry Proximity of new construction to physics poses disruption to research Estimated Costs: Fit out cave space: $2M Relocate EH&S, Radiochem: $7.9M New Bldg on Radiochem site: $64.7M Compton/Crow Addition: $33.6M Reno Compton/Crow: $33M Total: $141.2M Busch Labs Site: $63.8M

22. Integrated Science Initiative Washington University in St. Louis Slide 22 Scenario 2: Interdisciplinary Core Concept BUILD NEW BUILDING ON PARKING LOT SITE, EAST OF BROOKINGS A A EXACT SITE TBD NEW CONSTRUCTION

23. Integrated Science Initiative Washington University in St. Louis Slide 23 Scenario 2: Interdisciplinary Core Concept RELOCATE COMPUTER SCIENCE FROM BRYAN AND JOLLEY (SEAS) RELOCATE MATH (A&S) RENOVATE CUPPLES I FOR SWING SPACE AND LONG-TERM REUSE BY OTHER A&S UNITS B COMP SCI MATHADMIN+ FOOD B NEW CONSTRUCTION

24. Integrated Science Initiative Washington University in St. Louis Slide 24 Scenario 2: Interdisciplinary Core Concept VACATE URBAUER AND DEMOLISH 64,300 GSF (38,200 NSF) C C ENGN NEW CONSTRUCTION

25. Integrated Science Initiative Washington University in St. Louis Slide 25 Scenario 2: Interdisciplinary Core Concept CONSTRUCT NEW BUILDING IN THE URBAUER SITE FOR PHYSICS AND INTERDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH NEW BLDG: +122,500 GSF (+66,150 NSF) D D NEW CONSTRUCTION

26. Integrated Science Initiative Washington University in St. Louis Slide 26 Scenario 2: Interdisciplinary Core Concept RELOCATE PHYSICS OUT OF COMPTON AND CROW TO NEW URBAUER SITE E PHYSICS E INTERDISC E NEW CONSTRUCTION

27. Integrated Science Initiative Washington University in St. Louis Slide 27 Scenario 2: Interdisciplinary Core Concept RENOVATE, BACKFILL COMPTON/CROW WITH MEMS, IMSE, OTHER USES POSSIBLE CONNECTION BETWEEN RUDOLPH AND COMPTON F MEMS F NEW CONSTRUCTION

28. Integrated Science Initiative Washington University in St. Louis Slide 28 Scenario 2: Interdisciplinary Core Concept RENOVATE BRYAN AND JOLLEY FOR CHEMISTRY RESEARCH AND FUTURE GROWTH (FORMER COMP SCI AND MEMS SPACE) G CHEMISTRY G NEW CONSTRUCTION

29. Integrated Science Initiative Washington University in St. Louis Slide 29 Scenario 2: Interdisciplinary Core Concept New Construction Renovation

30. Integrated Science Initiative Washington University in St. Louis Slide 30 Interdisciplinary Core Concept Pros Bold improvement towards integrated sciences Improved proximity between A&S departments Significant improvements to Engineering space Takes advantage of existing, high-density development areas More research space further from potential road and light rail interference Cons Does not address all of A&S needs in first step Does not improve northern edge of campus in near-term Parking costs associated with building in east precinct Estimated Costs: New Bldg (E of Brookings): $50M Reno Bryan, Jolley for Chem: $10.8M New Bldg on Urbauer Site: $64.4M Relocate Urbauer Programs: $14.2M Compton/Crow Reno: $40.5M Jolley Reno (Remainder): $16M Total: $210M (Cost allocation TBD)

31. Integrated Science Initiative Washington University in St. Louis Slide 31 Concept Comparison Pros Critical needs addressed first with few enabling projects Independent implementation timeline Strengthens northern edge of campus Cons Business as usual; A&S only Incremental approach Dispersed academic adjacencies 1. Interdisciplinary Hubs Concept2. Interdisciplinary Core Concept Pros Bold improvement towards integrated sciences (A&S, SEAS, WUMS) Significant improvements to A&S and Engineering space and utilization Addresses worst condition existing facilities Completes vision for East Precinct Cons A&S improvements contingent on enabling projects May trigger significant parking costs in east precinct Bigger and more expensive

32. Integrated Science Initiative Washington University in St. Louis Slide 32 Concept Comparison New Bldg (E of Brookings): $50M Reno Bryan, Jolley for Chem: $10.8M Relocate Urbauer Programs: $14.2M New Bldg on Urbauer Site: $64.4M Compton/Crow Reno: $40.5M Jolley Reno (Remainder): $16M Total: $210M (Cost allocation TBD) NEW: 242,500 GSF RENOVATION: 190,700 GSF DEMOLITION: 64,317 GSF Estimated Costs: Fit out cave space: $2M Relocate EH&S, Radiochem: $7.9M New Bldg on Radiochem site: $64.7M Compton/Crow Addition: $33.6M Reno Compton/Crow: $33M Total: $141.2M NEW: 175,658 RENOVATION: 122,100 GSF DEMOLITION: 14,359 GSF 1. Interdisciplinary Hubs Concept2. Interdisciplinary Core Concept

33. Integrated Science Initiative Washington University in St. Louis Slide 33 Scenario 1: Interdisciplinary Hubs Concept

34. Integrated Science Initiative Washington University in St. Louis Slide 34 Scenario 2: Interdisciplinary Core Concept

35. Integrated Science Initiative Washington University in St. Louis Slide 35 Next Steps Follow up discussions between A&S and SEAS Refine cost estimates and impacts April 5 Buildings and Grounds meeting? Prepare recommendations for the Chancellor

36. Integrated Science Initiative Washington University in St. Louis Slide 36 3 March 25, 2013

37. Integrated Science Initiative Washington University in St. Louis Slide 37 Proposed Bio/Chem - Greenhouse

38. Integrated Science Initiative Washington University in St. Louis Slide 38 Scenario 1: Interdisciplinary Hubs – Long Term

39. Integrated Science Initiative Washington University in St. Louis Slide 39 Scenario 1: Interdisciplinary Hubs – Near Term

40. Integrated Science Initiative Washington University in St. Louis Slide 40 Scenario 1: Interdisciplinary Core

41. Integrated Science Initiative Washington University in St. Louis Slide 41 Engineering Programmatic Assessment MCSS 7,000 IMSE 20,000sf Chemistry 12,000 - 50,000 Physics 8,000- 12,000

42. Integrated Science Initiative Washington University in St. Louis Slide 42 Scenario 1: Interdisciplinary Hubs Concept – Long Term BUILD NEW BIOLOGY/CHEMISTRY BUILDING. MOVE PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY INTO THIS SITE NEW BLDG: +96,000GSF (+52,000NSF) F NEW CONSTRUCTION

43. Integrated Science Initiative Washington University in St. Louis Slide 43 Concept Comparison Pros First building sites require few enabling projects Critical needs addressed first Implementation of major components not dependent on each other Strengthens northern edge of campus Cons Follows pattern of incremental development Continues dispersed academic adjacencies Does not integrate directly with Engineering Unknown variables with Radiochem site (vibration, EMI) may not support physical chemistry Proximity of new construction to physics poses disruption to research 1. Interdisciplinary Hubs2. Interdisciplinary Core Pros Bold improvement towards integrated sciences Improved proximity between A&S departments Significant improvements to Engineering space and utilization Takes advantage of existing, high-density development areas More research space further from potential road and light rail interference Cons Does not address A&S needs in first step Does not improve northern edge of campus in near-term Parking costs associated with building in east precinct

44. Integrated Science Initiative Washington University in St. Louis Slide 44 Concept Comparison New Bldg (E of Brookings): $50M Reno Bryan, Jolley for Chem: $10.8M Relocate Urbauer Programs: $14.2M New Bldg on Urbauer Site: $64.4M Compton/Crow Reno: $40.5M Jolley Reno (Remainder): $16M Total: $210M Estimated Costs for A&S: $142M Other Costs: $68M (Partial new building, renovations for Engineering) NEW: 242,500 GSF RENOVATION: 190,700 GSF DEMOLITION: 64,317 GSF Estimated Costs: Fit out cave space: $2M Relocate EH&S, Radiochem: $7.9M New Bldg on Radiochem site: $64.7M Compton/Crow Addition: $33.6M Reno Compton/Crow: $33M Total: $141.2M NEW: 175,658 RENOVATION: 122,100 GSF DEMOLITION: 14,359 GSF 1. Interdisciplinary Hubs Concept2. Interdisciplinary Core Concept

45. Integrated Science Initiative Washington University in St. Louis Slide 45 Concept Comparison Pros First building sites require few enabling projects Critical needs addressed first Implementation of major components not dependent on each other Strengthens northern edge of campus Cons Follows pattern of incremental development Continues dispersed academic adjacencies Does not integrate directly with Engineering Unknown variables with Radiochem site (vibration, EMI) may not support physical chemistry Proximity of new construction to physics poses disruption to research 1. Interdisciplinary Hubs Concept2. Interdisciplinary Core Concept Pros Bold improvement towards integrated sciences Improved proximity between A&S departments Significant improvements to Engineering space and utilization Takes advantage of existing, high-density development areas More research space further from potential road and light rail interference Cons Does not address A&S needs in first step Does not improve northern edge of campus in near-term Parking costs associated with building in east precinct

46. Integrated Science Initiative Washington University in St. Louis Slide 46 Concept Comparison Pros Critical needs addressed first with few enabling projects Independent implementation timeline Strengthens northern edge of campus Cons Business as usual; A&S only Incremental approach Dispersed academic adjacencies 1. Interdisciplinary Hubs Concept2. Interdisciplinary Core Concept Pros Bold improvement towards integrated sciences (A&S, SEAS, WUMS) Significant improvements to A&S and Engineering space and utilization Addresses worst condition existing facilities Completes vision for East Precinct Cons A&S improvements contingent on enabling projects May trigger significant parking costs in east precinct Bigger and more expensive