1. Traditional Grammar Vs Linguistics
Prepared by : Zainab Hmito
Fatima Akouaou

2. The differences: The characteristics: Introduction Conclusion
Traditional grammar
Linguistics
The differences:
Schools of linguistics
The characteristics:
Weaknesses
Strengths
Conclusion

3. Introduction

4. Traditional grammar
The approach to language which was developed through:
Greeks
Roman
Arabo-Islamic scholarship
The Middle Ages
the Renaissance…

5. Linguistics:
The scientific study of language. According to Fatima Sadiqi and Moha Ennaji (1999):
“linguistics has two major goals :
1)-bringing our unconscious knowledge of language to the level of consciousness by familiarizing us with this linguistic knowledge.
2)-studying how the different units of language are combined and how they operate in the human brain.”

6. Components of linguistics:
It can be subdivided into five major components :
Phonetics: The study of the characteristics of speech sounds.
Phonology: The study of speech sounds of a language and the way they are combined to form words.
Morphology: The study of the structure ,forms and classes of words .
Syntax: The study of sentence structure.
Semantics:

7. Schools of linguistics
The structuralist school
Ferdinand de Saussure, Leonard Bloomfield.
language is a structure that can be studied independently from other aspects of human behavior.
The functionalist school
M.A.K Halliday,John Searl
Both structure and function must be taken into account to understand the nature of language.
The mentalist school
Noam Chomsky
“Primarily ,I am intrigued by the possibility of learning something
From the study of language ,that will bring to light inherent
properties of the human mind”.
Noam Chomsky.

8. Differences

9. Differences Between Traditional Grammar and Linguistics
T.G study language in relation to other disciplines.
study is not an
autonomous subject.
T.G explains how features of
language are related to the
human beings.
Linguistics study language as a complex and organized system of communication.
Language study is an autonomous subject.
Linguistics explains how features of language are related to each other.

10. Traditional grammar linguistics
T.G pays more attention to the written form of the
language
T.G is prescriptive.
T.G is interested more in syntax.
Linguistics puts emphasis on the spoken medium.
Linguistics is descriptive.
Linguistics has a brooder scope for research.

11. TRADITIONAL GRAMMAR LINGUISTICS
T.G puts emphasis on grammar than on any other aspect of the language.
T.G deals with language mostly from the diachronic point of view.
No notational conventions were used.
Linguistics analyses all the aspects of language.
Linguistics assumes that synchronic study has a priority over diachronic study.
Specific notational conventions used to refer to the data of language .

12. Characteristics

13. Strengths & Weaknesses

14. Strengths: Traditional grammar
Distinctions:
It distinguishes rational, emotional, and conventional types of discourse in theory, if not in grammatical practice.
Through It, ordinary students and scholars have mastered many languages successfully for centuries.

15. Strengths: Traditional grammar
It is well understood, and applied by most of those who teach it and have studied it.

16. Strengths: Linguistics
Empirical:
A study that examines speech and writing forms through a justifiable operation.
Objectivity:
All the languages are equal.
Universality:
All the languages share aspects beside their uniqueness.

17. Weaknesses: Traditional grammar
Inconsistency :
Its rules are based frequently on illogical ground.
Exclusion :
It excludes usages which are not applicable to it rules by referring to it as : “ungrammatical”, “exceptions”, “idioms”,…
Subjectivity :
Some languages are more sophisticated and cultured than other.

18. Weaknesses: Linguistics
It has produced no complete grammars comparing to the exhaustive treatments by the traditional methods. Concentrating on critical studies of how grammars should be written.
Only description of language was the concern of linguistics, however, this situation has changed in recent years.

19. Conclusion

20. References:
Newmeyer, FJ. (ed.) (1988) Linguistics: The Cambridge Survey. Cambridge: C.U.P.
Robins, R.H.(1967). A short History of Linguistics. London: Longmans.
Fatima Sadiqi, Moha Ennaji.(1999).Introduction To Modern Linguistics. Afrique-Orient.

21. Thank you!!