1. Implementation of an Agricultural Air Quality Program Tulare Ag Expo February 11, 2004 David L. Crow Executive Director/Air Pollution Control Officer San Joaquin Valley APCD www.valleyair.org

2. Background Long-standing permit exemption for Agricultural Sources under the State law Federal law requires permits for major agricultural sources (Title I and Title V) Federal sanctions (entire state) set for November 2003 unless ag exemption removed SB 700 (Florez) -- Signed into Law in 9/2003

3. SB 700 Summary Removes permit exemption for Agricultural sources (major and minor sources) Requires Particulate Matter (PM) controls (including PM precursors) Additional pollution controls and permits for Confined Animal Facilities (CAFs) Offers off-ramps from pollution control and permitting Treat agricultural facilities similar to other air pollution sources

4. SB 700 Control Requirements BACM and BARCT for sources where technology is transferable Controls for tilling, discing, cultivation, and raising of animals Controls for fugitive emissions Include measures for PM precursors Enforceable rules and regulations

5. Minimum Permitting Requirements Major agricultural sources will be subject to Title V and NSR requirements District MUST require permits for agricultural sources with emissions at or above ½ the major source thresholds unless certain findings are made at a public hearing District CANNOT require permits for sources with emissions below ½ major source thresholds unless certain findings are made at a public hearing

6. District may exempt a source if: Replace I.C. engines with electrical or State/EPA certified, and Mitigate emissions from all ag activities, and Mitigate emissions from all ag equipment May serve as an incentive that could lead to air quality benefit Permitting Offramp

7. More Requirements for CAFs 7/1/05 - CARB to define “Large” CAFs 7/1/06 – District to adopt permitting and mitigation rules for “Large CAFs” Degree of control = BARCT Regulations must be submitted to EPA for inclusion in the SIP

8. More Requirements for CAFs (cont.) 1/1/07 - “CAF permit” applications due from “large” CAFs District issue permits within 6 months (30-day public notice) Sources to implement mitigation within 1 year NOT a substitute for other permitting requirements

9. Permitting Timeline Ag. exemption goes away 1/1/2004 Existing sources: –Local permit applications due by 7/1/04 –Title V permit applications due 1/1/05 –Grandfathered (no BACT/ERCs) –BARCT/BACM later New sources (e.g., new dairies): –Effective 1/1/04 must obtain construction permits subject to BACT,ERCs, and public review

10. BACT Process Find the most effective control that is: –Technologically feasible –Cost effective/Achieved in practice Work with industry groups, individual dairies, equipment vendors Public workshops Evolve with time and science

11. Areas of Possible Dairy Controls and/or Practices Milking Center Cow Housing/Feeding Manure Storage Piles Land Application of Waste Material Lagoons

12. Number of affected sources Total number of facilities in the Valley: –Farms (~28,000) –CAFs (~5,500) Facilities subject to BARCT/BACM: –Farms (~8,000) –CAFs (~1,100) Facilities subject to permits –Farms (~4,000) –CAFs (~350) –Fewer sources may be affected after closer examination

13. Rule 4550 Conservation Management Plans Conservation Management Plans for Ag Sources Implement Controls for On-field Activities Similar to Permitting – but it’s Not Permitting Sources Select from Control Options

14. CMP Program Concept Mandatory participation for farm sites 100 contiguous acres and larger Select 1 measure from each of 5 categories –Land preparation/cultural activities –Harvest –Unpaved roads –Unpaved parking and staging areas –Other – wind erosion prevention, waste burning Relatively simple plans submitted to NRCS/RCD for review and to District for approval

15. CMP Program Practices proposed by growers to be provided in a handbook Growers can propose new measures for Ag Tech Committee review & District approval New and improved CMPs as technology develops over time Best Available Control Measures (BACM) Help achieve annual 5% reduction in PM emissions

16. Practices that reduce or eliminate the need to disturb the soil or manure Practices that protect the soil from wind erosion Equipment modifications to physically produce less PM10 Applying water or dust suppressants to reduce emissions entrained by moving vehicles and equipment Reducing speed or access on unpaved roads and parking areas Alternative practices to waste burning CMP Examples

17. CMP Timeline Rule development now underway Final workshops in March 2004 Rule adoption May 2004 Outreach/education ongoing CMP Program implementation begins July 2004 CMP Plans due no later than December 31, 2004 Fees to cover plan program costs with 50% discount for NRCS verification

18. Ag Research Priorities Dairy and other CAFO VOC emission factors – eventually need process based factors CAFO ammonia and PM10 emission factors On field management practice PM10 emission differentials Equipment modifications to reduce PM10 emissions

19. Ag Program Implementation Extensive outreach – Coordination with Industry Groups Small Business Assistance User-friendly application forms Web-based tools/aides Development of good science and staff expertise Coordination/Utilization with other agencies (e.g., NRCS, County agencies) Support legislation aiding effective implementation (e.g., Eliminate utility stand-by charges) Statewide coordination

20. Some Important Dates 1/1/2004 – SB700 Effective, No Ag Exemption, Title I & V 1/15/2004 – Governing Board Approves Staffing 5/20/2004 – District CMP Rule to Governing Board 7/1/2004 – District Permit Applications Due 1/1/2005 – Title V Application Deadline 1/1/2005 – CMP Applications Due 7/1/2005 – BARCT Rule for Ag IC Engines Due 7/1/2006 – District to Adopt Large CAF Permit Rule 1/1/2007 – Title V Permits Issued

21. Other Recent Air Legislation SB704 Biomass Funding- passed SB705 SJV Ag Burn Prohibition - passed -Phases out ag burning between 2005 and 2010 -District required to identify feasible alternatives to burning -Exceptions for diseased crops

22. SB704 - Agricultural Biomass to Energy Program Enacted September 22, 2003 Uses $6 million from Revenue Trust Fund $10/ton incentive for qualified agricultural biomass Paid to biomass facilities meeting certain criteria CEC will manage funds CEC holding hearing to adopt program guidelines February 18, 2004 All funds to be expended by June 30, 2004

23. SB 705 Changes to State Law Added Sections 41855.5 and 41855.6 to the California Health & Safety Code Prohibits the issuance of an agricultural burn permit within the San Joaquin Valley Air Basin for certain agricultural wastes, commencing on specified dates for each crop type Prohibition does not apply to prescribed burning or hazard reduction burning conducted in the foothills and mountain areas of the District

24. June 1, 2005 – Phase Out Field Crops: Alfalfa, asparagus, barley stubble, beans, corn, cotton, flower straw, hay, oat stubble, pea vines, peanuts, rice stubble, safflower, wheat stubble, and any other field crop Prunings: Apples, apricots, avocados, bush berries, cherries, Christmas trees, citrus, dates, eucalyptus, figs, kiwis, nectarines, nursery prunings, olives, peaches, persimmons, pistachios, plums, pluots, pomegranates, prunes, quince, rose prunings, trees and branches associated with pasture or corral maintenance, and any non-surface harvested prunings Weed Abatement: Berms, grass, fence rows, pasture, ponding or levee banks

25. June 1, 2007 – Phase out Orchard Removals: Orchard removal matter, stumps, and untreated wooden stakes

26. June 1, 2010 – Phase Out Other Materials: Brooder paper, deceased goats, and diseased beehives Surface Harvested Prunings: Almond, walnuts, pecans, grapevines, and vineyard removal materials Vineyard Materials: Grape canes and raisin trays

27. Amendments to Rule 4103 (Ag Burning) By June 1, 2005, the District shall develop and adopt rules: Establishing the best management practices for certain weeds and maintenance, as defined, and Regulate the burning of diseased crops

28. Smoke Management March 2001 - Title 17 California Code of Regulations Districts given a mandate to develop better tools to manage smoke Agricultural burning and Prescribed burning

29. Acreage Allocation District determines atmospheric holding capacity in local geographic areas Local meteorological data Local air quality data Local nuisance potential

30. How Will It Work? Permitting process remains the same – same cost Daily allocation for each geographic area will be established by District No more burn or no burn days Farmers call to request a burn -Accepted -Reduced acreage -Allocation full

31. Waiting List Priority over new requests You will receive an automated message the afternoon before you can burn Choose to burn next day or delay up to 5 times Call back to confirm that you will burn

32. Ways to request a burn Talk to an operator in person Use an automated phone system Use the Internet