Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

BRAIN GAIN vs. BRAIN DRAIN: A CASE STUDY OF PAKISTAN Safwan A. Khan, Vaqar Ahmed.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "BRAIN GAIN vs. BRAIN DRAIN: A CASE STUDY OF PAKISTAN Safwan A. Khan, Vaqar Ahmed."— Presentation transcript:

1 BRAIN GAIN vs. BRAIN DRAIN: A CASE STUDY OF PAKISTAN Safwan A. Khan, Vaqar Ahmed

2 Migration and Development: Emerging Debates Balanced growth theory (Haas, 2012) ▫Migration  development of human capital ▫Reverse transfers of money, knowledge, best practices, technology etc. Asymmetric development theory (Haas, 2012) ▫Migration  underdevelopment of the sending country ▫Brain drain Migration and development: no relationship (Skeldon, 2012)

3 The Case of Pakistan Average growth in annual emigration flows (1970-2011): 7%

4 Research Approach Data ▫Pakistan Economic Survey ▫World Development Indicators ▫Bureau of Emigration & Overseas Employment Theory triangulation ▫As on previous slide Methodological ▫Qualitative methods (Key informant interviews) ▫Quantitative methods (Time-series analysis)

5 Migration Patterns in Pakistan GDP growth and emigration (% change)

6 Pakistan: Consumption, savings, and remittance flows

7 Top emigrant destinations

8 Migration by labor type

9 Migration by province

10 The number of overseas Pakistanis (2010) Source: Bureau of Emigration and Overseas Employment (2010)

11 Time-series Analysis 3 SLS estimation (Foldvari et. al, 2012) Variables used ▫GDP per capita (lny) ▫Physical capital stock (lk) ▫Annual emigration numbers (ltm) ▫Literacy rate (lr) Period covered ▫1972-2011

12 Model specification lny t = β 10 + β 11 lnk t + β 12 tm t + β 13 lr t + u 1,t lnk t = β 20 + β 21 lny t + β 22 tm t + β 23 lr t + u 2,t tm t = β 30 + β 31 lny t + β 32 lnk t + β 33 lr t + u 3,t lr t = β 40 + β 41 lny t + β 42 lnk t + β 43 tm t + u 4,t

13 Regression Results Effect on GDP per capita

14 Effect on capital stock Effect on migration numbers

15 Effect on literacy rate

16 Migration & Development: Cross- cutting Themes Overseas exposure and training: qualified diasporas Japan: Knowledge and technology transfers due to increased migration Globalized citizenry Lack of economic opportunities  migration away from the country Pakistani exports 20% higher owing to Pak diasporas

17 1970s and 1980s: Loss in production quality as qualified personnel moved abroad

18 The case of illegal migrants: over 33 million in EU Bilateral readmission policies being undertaken by EU to address illegal migration The EU model of increased labor mobility and increased economic activity Two-way migration for reverse transfers and development Malaysia: improved markets  lower migration Labor Mobility and Development

19 Cluster phenomenon: concentration in sectors of comparative advantages rather than subsidies Exchange programs can be more beneficial for brain gain EU reintegration support fund: to facilitate migrant settlement in home country; run by NGOs instead of the GoP

20 Remittances & Development Higher remittances  inflationary pressures  poverty Remittance flows only second to export earnings Remittance spending  consumption goods and investment goods Use of remittance flows: financing of CAD  less available for expenditure on social services

21 Positive effect of remittances (Ahmed et al., 2010) ▫GDP growth ▫Household expenditure ▫Real investment ▫Poverty ▫Income inequality But need to be aware of ‘Dutch Disease’

22 Conflict & Migration Push and pull effects of migration Karachi: conflict  push migration  flight of capital FATA: conflict  pull migration  source of livelihoods

23 Case Studies on Returning Migrants Faculty at various public and private educational institutions Shifa International Omar Saif (SMSall) Centaurus Rozee.pk

24 Future Outlook 2014 withdrawal of US troops from Afghanistan  influx of Afghan migrants Push migration likely over the next 5 years  flight of talent Competitive markets  opportunities for commercial investments by diasporas ▫China ▫India

25 Policy Implications Skills training for manpower export  high end skills Too narrow a focus on remittances alone  engaging Diaspora in knowledge, ideas and technology transfer Easier transition for returning migrants  conducive business environment Diasporas  opportunities for export markets Competitive markets where Diaspora can enter into Joint Ventures: ASEAN economies, China, India

26 Thank you safwan@sdpi.org, vaqar@sdpi.org


Download ppt "BRAIN GAIN vs. BRAIN DRAIN: A CASE STUDY OF PAKISTAN Safwan A. Khan, Vaqar Ahmed."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google