Download presentation
Published byMaximillian Simpson Modified over 9 years ago
1
COSC 3100 Fundamentals of Analysis of Algorithm Efficiency
Instructor: Tanvir
2
Outline (Ch 2) Input size, Orders of growth,
Worst-case, Best-case, Average-case (Sec 2.1) Asymptotic notations and Basic efficiency classes (Sec 2.2) Analysis of Nonrecursive Algorithms (Sec 2.3) Analysis of Recursive Algoithms (Sec 2.4) Example: Computing n-th Fibonacci Number (Sec 2.5) Empirical Analysis, Algorithm Visualization (Sec 2.6, 2.7)
3
Analysis of Algoithms An investigation of an algorithm’s efficiency with respect to two resources: Running time (time efficiency or time complexity) Memory space (space efficiency or space complexity)
4
Analysis Framework Measuring an input’s size Measuring Running Time
Orders of Growth (of algorithm’s efficiency function) Worst-case, Best-case, and Average-case efficiency
5
Measuring Input Size Efficiency is defined as a function of input size
Input size depends on the problem Example 1: what is the input size for sorting n numbers? Example 2: what is the input size for evaluating 𝑝 𝑥 = 𝑎 𝑛 𝑥 𝑛 + 𝑎 𝑛−1 𝑥 𝑛−1 +⋯ + 𝑎 1 𝑥+ 𝑎 0 Example 3: what is the input size for multiplying two n×n matrices?
6
Units of measuring running time
Measure running time in milliseconds, seconds, etc. Depends on which computer Count the number of times each operation is executed Difficult and unnecessary Count the number of times an algorithm’s “basic operation” is executed
7
Measure running time in terms of # of basic operations
Basic operation: the operation that contributes the most to the total running time of an algorithm Usually the most time consuming operation in the algorithm’s innermost loop
8
Input size and basic operation examples
Problem Measure of input size Basic operation Search for a key in a list of n items # of items in the list Key comparison Add two n×n matrices Dimensions of the matrices, n Addition Polynomial evaluation Order of the polynomial Multiplication
9
Theoretical Analysis of Time Efficiency
Count the number of times the algorithm’s basic operation is executed on inputs of size n: C(n) T(n) ≈ cop × C(n) Input size Ignore cop, Focus on orders of growth # of times basic op. is executed Running time Execution time for basic operation If C(n) = 𝟏 𝟐 𝒏 𝒏−𝟏 , how much longer it runs if the input size is doubled?
10
Orders of Growth Why do we care about the order of growth of an algorithm’s efficiency function, i.e., the total number of basic operations? Euclid’s Consecutive Integer Checking gcd(60, 24) 3 13 gcd(31415, 14142) 10 14142 gcd( , ) 97 > 1020 How fast efficiency function grows as n gets larger and larger…
11
Orders of Growth (contd.)
lgn n×lgn n2 n3 2n n! 10 3.3 3.3×10 102 103 3.6×106 6.6 6.6×102 104 106 1.3×1030 9.3×10157 10×103 109 13 13×104 108 1012 105 17 17×105 1010 1015 20 20×106 1018
12
Orders of Growth (contd.)
Plots of growth… Consider only the leading term Ignore the constant coefficients
13
Worst, Best, Average Cases
Efficiency depends on input size n For some algorithms, efficiency depends on the type of input Example: Sequential Search Given a list of n elements and a search key k, find if k is in the list Scan list, compare elements with k until either found a match (success), or list is exhausted (failure)
14
Sequential Search Algorithm
ALGORITHM SequentialSearch(A[0..n-1], k) //Input: A[0..n-1] and k //Output: Index of first match or -1 if no match is //found i <- 0 while i < n and A[i] ≠ k do i <- i+1 if i < n return i //A[i] = k else return -1
15
Different cases Worst case efficiency Best case efficiency
Efficiency (# of times the basic op. will be executed) for the worst case input of size n Runs longest among all possible inputs of size n Best case efficiency Runs fastest among all possible inputs of size n Average case efficiency Efficiency for a typical/random input of size n NOT the average of worst and best cases How do we find average case efficiency?
16
Average Case of Sequential Search
Two assumptions: Probability of successful search is p (0 ≤ p ≤ 1) Search key can be at any index with equal probability (uniform distribution) Cavg(n) = Expected # of comparisons = Expected # of comparisons for success + Expected # of comparisons if k is not in the list
17
Summary of Analysis Framework
Time and space efficiencies are functions of input size Time efficiency is # of times basic operation is executed Space efficiency is # of extra memory units consumed Efficiencies of some algorithms depend on type of input: requiring worst, best, average case analysis Focus is on order of growth of running time (or extra memory units) as input size goes to infinity
18
Asymptotic Growth Rate
3 notations used to compare orders of growth of an algorithm’s basic operation count O(g(n)): Set of functions that grow no faster than g(n) Ω(g(n)): Set of functions that grow at least as fast as g(n) Θ(g(n)): Set of functions that grow at the same rate as g(n)
19
O(big oh)-Notation c × g(n) t(n) Doesn’t matter n n0 t(n) є O(g(n))
20
t(n) ≤ c × g(n) for all n ≥ n0
O-Notation (contd.) Definition: A function t(n) is said to be in O(g(n)), denoted t(n) є O(g(n)), if t(n) is bounded above by some positive constant multiple of g(n) for sufficiently large n. If we can find +ve constants c and n0 such that: t(n) ≤ c × g(n) for all n ≥ n0
21
O-Notation (contd.) Is 100n+5 є O(n2) ?
Is 2n+1 є O(2n) ? Is 22n є O(2n) ? Is 1 2 n(n-1) є O(n2) ?
22
Ω(big omega)-Notation
t(n) c × g(n) Doesn’t matter n n0 t(n) є Ω(g(n))
23
t(n) ≥ c × g(n) for all n ≥ n0
Ω-Notation (contd.) Definition: A function t(n) is said to be in Ω(g(n)) denoted t(n) є Ω(g(n)), if t(n) is bounded below by some positive constant multiple of g(n) for all sufficiently large n. If we can find +ve constants c and n0 such that t(n) ≥ c × g(n) for all n ≥ n0
24
Ω-Notation (contd.) Is n3 є Ω(n2) ? Is 100n+5 є Ω(n2) ?
Is 1 2 n(n-1) є Ω(n2) ?
25
Θ(big theta)-Notation
c1 × g(n) t(n) c2 × g(n) Doesn’t matter n n0 t(n) є Θ(g(n))
26
c2×g(n) ≤ t(n) ≤ c1×g(n) for all n ≥ n0
Θ-Notation (contd.) Definition: A function t(n) is said to be in Θ(g(n)) denoted t(n) є Θ(g(n)), if t(n) is bounded both above and below by some positive constant multiples of g(n) for all sufficiently large n. If we can find +ve constants c1, c2, and n0 such that c2×g(n) ≤ t(n) ≤ c1×g(n) for all n ≥ n0
27
Θ-Notation (contd.) Is 1 2 n(n-1) є Θ(n2) ? Is n2+sin(n) є Θ(n2) ?
Is an2+bn+c є Θ(n2) for a > 0? Is (n+a)b Θ(nb) for b > 0 ?
28
O, Θ, and Ω (≥) Ω(g(n)): functions that (=) Θ(g(n)): functions that
grow at least as fast as g(n) (=) Θ(g(n)): functions that grow at the same rate as g(n) g(n) (≤) O(g(n)): functions that grow no faster that g(n)
29
t1(n) + t2(n) є O(max{g1(n),g2(n)})
Theorem If t1(n) є O(g1(n)) and t2(n) є O(g2(n)), then t1(n) + t2(n) є O(max{g1(n),g2(n)}) Analogous assertions are true for Ω and Θ notations. Implication: if sorting makes no more than n2 comparisons and then binary search makes no more than log2n comparisons, then efficiency is O(max{n2, log2n}) = O(n2)
30
t1(n) + t2(n) є O(max{g1(n),g2(n)})
Theorem (contd.) If t1(n) є O(g1(n)) and t2(n) є O(g2(n)), then t1(n) + t2(n) є O(max{g1(n),g2(n)}) t1(n) ≤ c1g1(n) for n ≥ n01 and t2(n) ≤ c2g2(n) for n ≥ n02 t1(n) + t2(n) ≤ c1g1(n) + c2g2(n) for n ≥ max { n01, n02 } t1(n) + t2(n) ≤ max{c1, c2} g1(n) + max{c1, c2} g2(n) for n ≥ max { n01, n02 } t1(n) + t2(n) ≤ 2max{c1, c2} max{g1(n), g2(n) }, for n ≥ max{n01, n02} c n0
31
Using Limits for Comparing Orders of Growth
0 implies that t(n) grows slower than g(n) c implies that t(n) grows at the same order as g(n) ∞ implies that t(n) grows faster than g(n) 1. First two cases (0 and c) means t(n) є O(g(n)) 2. Last two cases (c and ∞) means t(n) є Ω(g(n)) 3. The second case (c) means t(n) є Θ(g(n))
32
Taking Limits L’Hôpital’s rule: if limits of both t(n) and g(n) are ∞ as n goes to ∞, lim 𝑛→∞ 𝑡(𝑛) 𝑔(𝑛) = lim 𝑛→∞ 𝑡′(𝑛) 𝑔′(𝑛) = lim 𝑛→∞ 𝑑𝑡(𝑛) 𝑑𝑛 𝑑𝑔(𝑛) 𝑑𝑛 Stirling’s formula: For large n, we have n! ≈ 2𝜋𝑛 𝑛 𝑒 𝑛
33
Stirling’s Formula n! = n (n-1) (n-2) … 1 ln(n!) = 𝑘=1 𝑛 ln(𝑘)
Trapezoidal rule: 1 𝑛 ln 𝑥 𝑑𝑥 ≈ ln ln …+ ln 𝑛− ln(𝑛) 1 𝑛 ln 𝑥 𝑑𝑥 ≈ ln ln …+ ln 𝑛− ln(𝑛) Add 1 2 ln(𝑛) to both sides, 𝑛𝑙𝑛 𝑛 −𝑛 ln(𝑛) ≈ 𝑘=1 𝑛 ln(𝑘) Exponentiate both sides, n! ≈ C nne-nn1/ = C 𝒏 𝒏 𝒆 𝒏 … 1 2 3 4 n
34
Taking Limits (contd.) Compare orders of growth of 22n and 3n
Compare orders of growth of lgn and 𝒏 Compare orders of growth of n! and 2n
35
Summary of How to Establish Order of Growth of Basic Operation Count
Method 1: Using Limits Method 2: Using Theorem Method 3: Using definitions of O-, Ω-, and Θ-notations.
36
Basic Efficiency Classes
Name Comments 1 constant May be in best cases lgn logarithmic Halving problem size at each iteration n linear Scan a list of size n n×lgn linearithmic Divide and conquer algorithms, e.g., mergesort n2 quadratic Two embedded loops, e.g., selection sort n3 cubic Three embedded loops, e.g., matrix multiplication 2n exponential All subsets of n-elements set n! factorial All permutations of an n-elements set
37
Important Summation Formulas
𝑖=𝑙 𝑢 1 =𝑢−𝑙+1 𝑖=1 𝑛 𝑖 = 𝑛(𝑛+1) 2 ≈ 𝑛 2 𝑖=1 𝑛 𝑖 2 = 𝑛(𝑛+1)(2𝑛+1) 6 ≈ 𝑛 3 𝑖=0 𝑛 𝑎 𝑖 = 𝑎 𝑛+1 −1 𝑎−1 (𝑎≠1) 𝑖=1 𝑛 𝑖 𝑎 𝑖 =𝑎 𝑑 𝑑𝑎 𝑎 𝑛+1 −1 𝑎−1 𝒊=𝒍 𝒖 𝒄 𝒂 𝒊 =𝒄 𝒊=𝒍 𝒖 𝒂 𝒊 𝒊=𝒍 𝒖 𝒂 𝒊 ± 𝒃 𝒊 = 𝒊=𝒍 𝒖 𝒂 𝒊 ± 𝒊=𝒍 𝒖 𝒃 𝒊
38
Analysis of Nonrecursive Algorithms
ALGORITHM MaxElement(A[0..n-1]) //Determines largest element maxval <- A[0] for i <- 1 to n-1 do if A[i] > maxval maxval <- A[i] return maxval Input size: n Basic operation: > or <- C(n) = 𝒊=𝟏 𝒏−𝟏 𝟏 =𝒏−𝟏−𝟏+𝟏 =𝒏−𝟏 є Θ(n)
39
General Plan for Analysis of Nonrecursive algorithms
Decide on a parameter indicating an input’s size Identify the basic operation Does C(n) depends only on n or does it also depend on type of input? Set up sum expressing the # of times basic operation is executed. Find closed form for the sum or at least establish its order of growth
40
Analysis of Nonrecursive (contd.)
ALGORITHM UniqueElements(A[0..n-1]) //Determines whether all elements are //distinct for i <- 0 to n-2 do for j <- i+1 to n-1 do if A[i] = A[j] return false return true Input size: n Basic operation: A[i] = A[j] Does C(n) depend on type of input?
41
UniqueElements (contd.)
for i <- 0 to n-2 do for j <- i+1 to n-1 do if A[i] = A[j] return false return true Cworst(n) = 𝑖=0 𝑛−2 𝑗=𝑖+1 𝑛−1 1 = 𝑛−1 𝑛 2 ≈ 1 2 𝑛 2 ∈Θ 𝑛 2 Why Cworst(n) ∈𝜣 𝒏 𝟐 is better than saying Cworst(n) ∈𝑶 𝒏 𝟐 ?
42
Analysis of Nonrecursive (contd.)
ALGORITHM MatrixMultiplication(A[0..n-1, 0..n-1], B[0..n-1, 0..n-1]) //Output: C = AB for i <- 0 to n-1 do for j <- 0 to n-1 do C[i, j] = 0.0 for k <- 0 to n-1 do C[i, j] = C[i, j] + A[i, k]×B[k, j] return C T(n) ≈ cmM(n)+caA(n) = cmn3+can3 = (cm+ca)n3 Input size: n Basic operation: × M(n) = 𝒊=𝟎 𝒏−𝟏 𝒋=𝟎 𝒏−𝟏 𝒌=𝟎 𝒏−𝟏 𝟏
43
Analysis of Nonrecursive (contd.)
ALGORITHM Binary(n) // Output: # of digits in binary // representation of n count <- 1 while n > 1 do count <- count+1 n <- 𝑛 2 return count Input size: n Basic operation: C(n) = ? Each iteration halves n Let m be such that 2m ≤ n < 2m+1 Take lg: m ≤ lg(n) < m+1, so m = 𝐥𝐠(𝒏) and m+1 = 𝐥𝐠(𝒏) +1 є Θ(lg(n))
44
Analysis of Nonrecursive (contd.)
ALGORITHM Mystery(n) S <- 0 for i <- 1 to n do S <- S + i×i return S What does this algorithm compute? What is the basic operation? How many times is the basic operation executed? What’s its efficiency class? Can you improve it further, or Can you prove that no improvement is possible?
45
Analysis of Nonrecursive (contd.)
ALGORITHM Secret(A[0..n-1]) r <- A[0] s <- A[0] for i <- 1 to n-1 do if A[i] < r r <- A[i] if A[i] > s s <- A[i] return s-r What does this algorithm compute? What is the basic operation? How many times is the basic operation executed? What’s its efficiency class? Can you improve it further, Or Could you prove that no improvement is possible?
46
Analysis of Recursive Algorithms
ALGORITHM F(n) // Output: n! if n = 0 return 1 else return n×F(n-1) Input size: n Basic operation: × M(n) = M(n-1) + 1 for n > 0 to compute F(n-1) to multiply n and F(n-1)
47
Analysis of Recursive (contd.)
M(n) = M(n-1) + 1 M(0) = 0 M(n) = M(n-1) + 1 = M(n-2) = … … = M(n-n) … = 0 + n = n We could compute it nonrecursively, saves function call overhead Recurrence relation By Backward substitution n 1’s
48
General Plan for Recursive
Decide on input size parameter Identify the basic operation Does C(n) depends also on input type? Set up a recurrence relation Solve the recurrence or, at least establish the order of growth of its solution
49
Analysis of Recursive (contd.): Tower of Hanoi
50
Tower of Hanoi (contd.) M(n-1) M(n) = M(n-1) + 1 + M(n-1) M(1) = 1
51
Tower of Hanoi (contd.) ALGORITHM ToH(n, s, m, d) if n = 1 print “move from s to d” else ToH(n-1, s, d, m) ToH(n-1, m, s, d) M(1) = 1 M(n-1) M(1) M(n-1)
52
Tower of Hanoi (contd.) M(n) = 2M(n-1) + 1 for n > 1 M(1) = 1
M(n) = 2M(n-1) + 1 [Backward substitution…] = 2[ 2M(n-2)+1] + 1 = 22M(n-2)+2+1 = 22[2M(n-3)+1]+2+1 = 23M(n-3) … … … = 2n-1M(n-(n-1))+2n-2+2n-3+…… = 2n-1+ 2n-2+2n-3+…… = 𝑖=0 𝑛−1 2 𝑖 = 2n-1 M(n) є Θ(2n) Be careful! Recursive algorithm may look simple But might easily be exponential in complexity.
53
Tower of Hanoi (contd.) Recursion tree (# of function calls)
… 2 1 C(n) = 𝒍=𝟎 𝒏−𝟏 𝟐 𝒍 = 2n-1
54
Analysis of Recursive (contd.)
ALGORITHM BinRec(n) //Output: # of binary digits in n’s //binary representation if n = 1 return 1 else return BinRec( 𝑛 2 )+1 Input size: n = 2k Basic operation: + A(n) = A(2k) = A(2k-1) + 1 = [A(2k-2) + 1] + 1 = … = A(2k-k)+k = A(1) + k = k = lg(n) A(n) є Θ(lg(n))
55
Analysis of Recursive (contd.)
Maximum how many slices of pizza can a person obtain by making n straight cuts with a pizza knife? L1 = 2 L2 = 4 L0 = 1 difference 1 2 3 L3 = 7 1, 2, 4, 7, … Ln = Ln-1 + n for n > 0 L0 = 1 Bonus problem in HW2
56
EXAMPLE: nth Fibonacci Number
0, 1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21, 34, … F(n) = F(n-1) + F(n-2) for n > 1 F(0) = 0, F(1) = 1 Let’s try backward substitution… F(n) = F(n-2)+F(n-3)+F(n-3)+F(n-4) = F(n-2)+2F(n-3)+F(n-4) = F(n-3)+3F(n-4)+3F(n-5)+F(n-6) …
57
nth Fibonacci (contd.) ax(n)+bx(n-1)+cx(n-2) = 0 Homogeneous linear second-order recurrence with constant coefficients Guess: x(n) = rn arn+brn-1+crn-2 = 0 ar2+br+c = 0 THEOREM: If r1, r2 are two real distinct roots of characteristic equation then x(n) = αr1n+βr2n where α, β are arbitrary constants Characteristic equation
58
nth Fibonacci (contd.) F(n)-F(n-1)-F(n-2) = 0 r2-r-1 = 0 => r1,2 = 1± 1−4 −1 2 = 1± 5 2 F(n) = α 𝑛 +β 1− 5 2 𝑛 F(0) = α β 1− = 0 => α+β=0 F(1) = α β 1− = 1 F(n) = 𝑛 − 1 5 1− 5 2 𝑛 = 1 5 𝜑 𝑛 − 𝜑 𝑛 where 𝜑= ≈ and 𝜑 = - 1 𝜑
59
nth Fibonacci (contd.) F(n) = 𝜑 𝑛 − 𝜑 𝑛 where 𝜑 ≈ and 𝜑 ≈ F(n) є Θ(φn) ALGORITHM F(n) if n ≤ 1 return n else return F(n-1)+F(n-2) A(n) = A(n-1)+A(n-2)+1 A(0) = 0, A(1) = 0 [A(n)+1] –[A(n-1)+1]-[A(n-2)+1]=0 Let B(n) = A(n)+1 B(n) –B(n-1)-B(n-2)=0 B(0)=1, B(1)=1 Notice, B(n) = F(n+1) A(n) = B(n)-1=F(n+1)-1 = 𝜑 𝑛+1 − 𝜑 𝑛+1 -1 A(n) є Θ(φn) Basic op: +
60
nth Fibonacci (contd.) F(5) F(4) F(3) F(2) F(1) F(0)
Only n-1 additions, Θ(n)! ALGORITHM Fib(n) F[0] <- 0 F[1] <- 1 for i <- 2 to n do F[i] <- F[i-1]+F[i-2] return F[n] ALGORITHM Fib(n) f <- 0 fnext <- 1 for i <- 2 to n do tmp <- fnext fnext <- fnext+f f <- tmp return fnext
61
Empirical Analysis Mathematical Analysis Empirical Analysis Advantages
Machine and input independence Disadvantages Average case analysis is hard Empirical Analysis Applicable to any algorithm Machine and input dependency
62
Empirical Analysis (contd.)
General Plan Understand Experiment’s purpose: What is the efficiency class? Compare two algorithms for same problem Efficiency metric: Operation count vs. time unit Characteristic of input sample (range, size, etc.) Write a program Generate sample inputs Run on sample inputs and record data Analyze data
63
Empirical Analysis (contd.)
Insert counters into the program to count C(n) Or, time the program, (tfinish-tstart), in Java System.currentTimeMillis() Typically not very accurate, may vary Remedy: make several measurements and take mean or median May give 0 time, remedy: run in a loop and take mean
64
Empirical Analysis (contd.)
Increase sample size systematically, like 1000, 2000, 3000, …, 10000 Impact is easier to analyze Better is to generate random sizes within desired range Because, odd sizes may affect Pseudorandom number generators In Java Math.random() gives uniform random number in [0, 1) If you need number in [min, max]: min + (int)( Math.random() * ( (max-min) + 1 ) )
65
Empirical Analysis (contd.)
Pseudorandom in [min, max] Math.random() * (max-min) gives [0, max-min) min + Math.random() * (max-min) gives [min, max) (int)[Math.random() * (max-min+1)] gives [0, max-min] min+ (int)[Math.random() * (max-min+1)] gives [min, max] To get [5, 10] (int)Math.random()*(10-5+1) gives [0, 10-5] or [0, 5] 5+ (int)Math.random()*(10-5+1) gives [5, 10]
66
Empirical Analysis (contd.)
Profiling: find out most time-consuming portion, Eclipse and Netbeans have it Tabulate data If M(n)/g(n) converges to a +ve constant, we know M(n) є Θ(g(n)) Or look at M(2n)/M(n); e.g., if M(n) є Θ(lgn) then M(2n)/M(n) will be low n M(n) g(n) M(n)/g(n)
67
Empirical Analysis (contd.)
Scatterplot M(n) ≈ can lgM(n) ≈ nlga + lgc count/time count/time n n n lgn count/time nlgn or n2 n
68
Algorithm Visualization (contd.)
Sequence of still pictures or animation Sorting Out Sorting on YouTube Nice animation of 9 sorting algorithms
69
Summary Time and Space Efficiency
C(n): Count of # of times the basic operation is executed for input of size n C(n) may depend on type of input and then we need worst, average, and best case analysis Usually order of growth (O, Ω, Θ) is all that matters: logarithmic, linear, linearithmic, quadratic, cubic, and exponential Input size, basic op., worst case?, sum or recurrence, solve it… We run on computers for empirical analysis
70
Homework 2 DUE ON FEBRUARY 07 (TUESDAY) IN CLASS
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.