Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byPhilomena Carter Modified over 9 years ago
1
___________________________________________________________
2
Systematic Assessment of Spectrum Policy and Mobile Market Structure Özkan Demirbilek Supervisor : Prof. Heikki Hämmäinen MSc. in Communications Ecosystem Comnet Research Team – Instructor : Arturo Basaure Master’s Thesis Presentation June 13, 2013
3
Agenda o Background o Research Goals o Methods o Studied Mobile Markets o Market Analysis o Spectrum Policy o Market Structure o Results and discussion o Conclusions and Recommendation for Future Work 3
4
Background Open Industry Decentralized Spectrum Licensing Policy 1.Number of licenses for mobile services (<3) 2.Level of liberalization of usage rights 3.Service/ Technology neutrality Industry Structure Policy 1.Switching Costs 2.NO/SO separation 3.MNP and SIM-locking 4.Roaming and interworking between systems 5.Unbundling of services Source: Basaure et al. (2012)
5
Research Goals o Development of quantitative metrics to phase diagram for mobile telecom regulations o Applying the metrics to multiple mobile markets 5
6
o Literature review o Theoretical frameworks o Data collection on mobile markets o Data sources Regulator, mobile operator and consultancy company websites o Combination of theoretical frameworks with state-of-art mobile market situation 6 Methods
7
Studied Mobile Markets
8
o Spectrum-HHI o Market-based approaches are the most common o Finland, only market with symmetrical spectrum distribution o Japan, China only beauty contests o Australia, USA, India regional licenses 8 Spectrum Policy Analysis (1)
9
Spectrum Policy Analysis (2) 9 Reselling RightsNot AvailablePartly AvailableAvailable Mobile MarketsChile, Turkey, India, Japan, China FinlandSweden, UK, USA, Australia, New Zealand o Reselling Rights o Auctions Effective spectrum allocation o Sustaining the efficiency over time? o Regulator intervention or re-assigning of spectrum by market forces? o Technology Neutrality / Harmonization o What is the driver? Let the market decide or coordinate the market? Technology FrameworkHarmonizationNeutrality (regulator), Harmonization (market) Neutrality Mobile Markets Finland, Turkey, China*Chile, New Zealand, Australia, Sweden, UK USA, India, Japan
10
Spectrum Policy Analysis (3) 10 o Market-HHI o China; incumbent 66% market share o India very fragmented 13+ MNO o Sweden, UK, US, India > 3 MNO o Chile, just accepted two more MNO Mobile MarketsMarket HHI China4952 New Zealand3883 Turkey3839 Japan3653 Chile3608 Australia3514 Finland3346 Sweden2951 United Kingdom2610 United States2540 India1360
11
Market Structure Analysis (1) Existence of multinational MNO YesNo Mobile MarketsUK, US, Turkey, New Zealand, Australia, Finland, Sweden, India, Chile China, Japan 11 o Multinational MNOs o Foreign direct investment (FDI) o Managerial expertise and breaking protectionism o Macro-economic environment should be suitable for entry PESTEL o Investment o Persistent level of investment based on o Technological innovation, spectrum fees and market development o Prices o One of the marketing mix element o Different pricing schemes available: flat, block, unit based
12
Market Structure Analysis (2) 12 Mobile Markets Investments/ Subscriptions (€) Japan96 Australia57 Chile49.8 United States48.4 New Zealand35.08 Sweden26.13 UK23.9 Finland23.8 China20.2 Turkey15.9 India10.1 Mobile MarketsMobile Tariffs Japan0,81 Australia0,64 New Zealand0,55 Turkey0,40 United Kingdom0,31 Chile0,29 United States0,25 China0,15 Sweden0,08 Finland0,07 India0,06
13
Market Structure Analysis (3) 13 o ARPU o Tracking revenue growth o Market development in India rural areas Mobile Markets Monthly ARPU ($) Japan84 Australia48 United States47 Finland32 New Zealand21 Sweden18 United Kingdom17 Chile16,36 Turkey11 China9.82 India1.6 Mobile marketsPrepaid Ratio (%) Finland13 Chile71 Sweden31 Turkey63 United Kingdom50 China87 India95 New Zealand66 Australia38,3 United States25 Japan2,0 o Switching costs o Prepaid ratio o Mobile Number Portability o Except China, available in the rest
14
Market Structure Analysis (4) 14 o Churn rate o Closely linked to switching cost o Fluctates based on dynamics o India the highest, Japan the least o Network Operator / Service Operator Separation o Increased market competition o Hit and escape Countries Monthly churn rate (%) Finland1.20 Chile1.50 Sweden1.10 Turkey3.38 United Kingdom2.9 China3.5 India6 New Zealand0.83 Australia1.8 United States1.10 Japan0.62 NO / SO separationYesNo Mobile marketsFinland, Sweden, United Kingdom, New Zealand, Australia Chile, Turkey, China, India, United States, Japan
15
Results (1) 15 o Spectrum policy explaining factor o Spectrum-HHI o Spectrum holdings in different bands possess differences o Reselling rights o Secondary trading markets not roll-out yet o Technology neutrality /harmonization o determines service offerings, influences market shares o Spectrum has clear effect on competitiveness (Lungborg) Market shares o The spectrum policy explaining factor is market-HHI
16
Results (2) 16
17
Results (3) 17 o Market structure explaining factor o Prepaid subscriptions lower switching costs, high churn rate
18
Results (4) I 18 o ARPU correlates with investment per subscriber
19
Results (5) 19 o Market Structure explaining factor o Industry unbundling framework improve ( price/quality ) ratio o Vertically disintegrated competition in retail reduction in prices o Vertically integrated High level of investment o Prices Present situation in the industry o Investments Future direction of the industry Prices and Investments per Subscriber is the explaining factor
20
Results (6) 20 Spectrum policy Market Structure
21
Conclusions and Recommendation for Future 21 o Explaining factors: o Spectrum policy market-HHI o Market structure Prices and Investments per Subscribers o Highlights from the markets o The most open and decentralized market is India o The most closed industry is Japan o European markets are more open than American market o Recommendation for future research o Enhancing the database o Developing the theoretical framework
22
Thank you ! 22 Questions?
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.