1. Group 02 – Ethics Presentation Anthony Shillingburg Olumuyiwa Oyeleye Kyle Whetzel Scott Hamrick

2.  Antenna Engineering (AE) designed and manufactured a tower for television antenna.  Riggers, Inc. (RI) was contracted for raising and assembling the tower.  RI approved plans submitted by AE.  RI couldn’t raise final section of antenna due to obstruction from microwave baskets.  AE refused RI permission to remove baskets.  RI made amendments, which AE refused to review or comment on in order to not have any liability.

3.  The bolt manufacturer sold bolts that did not meet the specifications as advertised.  RI approved the amended plan without proper testing.  AE refused to comment on the amended plan.

4.  Bolt manufacturer sued – settled out of court  Seven (7) riggers lost their lives due to this incident

5.  AE could have informed RI of previous companies having to remove the microwave baskets and that this would be absolutely not allowed.  AE could have urged RI to consult a third-party engineering firm.  AE could have looked at the original design with RI to ensure nothing was missed.  AE could have accepted liability and looked at the proposed amendments.  AE could have looked at the amended plans.

6.  RI could delay the job until deemed safe.  RI could have tested the bolts before use.  Bolt manufacturer could have not sold weak materials.  Had the bolt material been as strong as RI has requested, the weight of the antenna would still have been too great for the bolts to handle.  Stress in bolts was 7 times what the riggers though it would be

7.  Video security over a network.  Physical hazard to consumer

8.  Network security.  Sensors on robot to prevent collisions.  Option to see when login was made and from what IP address  Option to force shut down robot